We look for second-tier options if the customer is really stretched for budget. It is a suboptimal arrangement. We often encourage customers to stretch their budgets and choose Documentum as a long-term investment. The tool provides value for money.

We evaluated Nuxeo. We worked with both Nuxeo and OpenText simultaneously

We evaluate other options as our regular business plan. We do not always assume we are upgrading what we have. As a business process, we always look at what we have versus what is available in the market. The main differences between Documentum and others are the compatibility with other systems and tailored solutions for our industry. Sometimes, it is language compatibility and things of that nature for actual human language, not computer language.

Before choosing OpenText Documentum, we evaluated SharePoint and Box. We chose OpenText Documentum because it had the most features and was the most user-friendly for the security we needed.

SharePoint, IBM, Oracle.

I was not involved in product evaluation. The organization evaluated FileNet as one option, but I can't say much about it.

I would advise others that the best solution for enterprise content management is either Documentum or Microsoft SharePoint.