We have Prisma Cloud, which is not fully implemented, so we need to use Check Point simultaneously. Prisma Cloud excels in terms of UA, visibility, and user-level policies and management. CloudGuard is more cost-efficient but not as user-friendly as Palo Alto. At the same time, having the GSL Builder makes it more efficient to make CNAPP rules without much background knowledge.

We used a Cloud-native solution to identify security issues but it did not provide any detailed visibility. Also, multiple console access where required in order to identify and security flaw.

No, we have not used any solution before.

We have not used any other solution. We have been a Check Point customer for a long time. When it started to come out, we started to take it on.

We are still using a variety of firewall solutions, including Juniper and Cisco, throughout our organization. As a government organization, we are required to purchase the cheapest option available. Therefore, we must utilize the solution that is the most affordable in each case.

We have been using CloudGuard from day one. It used to be known by another name. We have been using it before the name change. We are long-time customers.

Previously, there was no tool in the company's infrastructure. We needed the solution when we moved to the cloud and decided to improve security.

I have not used a posture management solution before.

Initially, we were using tools provided by the service provider. These included Scout Suite, AWS Config, AWS Trusted Advisor, and Amazon GuardDuty. These are monitoring tools, and we used similar tools for Azure as well. We needed to go through different consoles to identify any incident, which was not convenient.

We used Palo Alto's Prisma Cloud. We switched because it did not have the feature sets we were looking for. The price was not very flexible, and we did not get the type of support we needed. It was not like the support that we get from Check Point as our partner.

We were using a third-party solution earlier, which was quite localized and was having limited utility in terms of system security. We switched to Check Point due to peer feedback and advice, as my peers were extremely happy after trial use and pushed us to try the solution due to its numerous utilities, which are customizable. It is quite affordable in comparison to its other competitors in the market.

Earlier, we tested other tools as well, however, the features which were available via Check Point are very good and the future roadmap is also very good in regards to cloud security.

Initially, we were using tools provided by the service provider, such as, ScoutSuite, AWS Config Rules, AWS Trusted Advisor, or Amazon GuardDuty for monitoring, and similar tools for Azure as well. Then, we needed to go through a different console to identify any incidents.

Initially, we used submit a report, but there was no remediation nor information provided how to remediate workload issues. In our current scenarios, we are able to get the complete visibility. The complete visibility of the solution has been a key to the increase in our productivity.

The other security products that I have worked with had responded poorly which is why we moved to Check Point.

We did not use a different solution before.

We did not use another solution prior to Dome9.

Before implementing Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management, we relied on the native CSPM of AWS Config.

For beginners in the field, AWS might be a good starting point due to its simplicity. However, for more experienced users who require more advanced features, CloudGuard offers a more mature and comprehensive solution.

Check Point was always our first option as many security teams are from Check Point.

No other solution has been implemented.

Currently, we only had other Check Point tools.

I've used Palo Alto Prisma Cloud, but I've also used Palo Alto's Cloud Security Posture Management tooling. I prefer Check Point, which is why we have it.

I still have both solutions, but I use Palo Alto for something else. I use Twistlock, a Prisma Cloud module, for runtime protection of containerized workloads. I also use Dome9 for CSPM. I did not like using Prisma Cloud for CSPM because I did not care for the rule language or configuration. 

Also, I feel like Check Point, and Dome9 listen to their users. If I'm dying for a new feature to improve the solution, they would hear me out and consider it. I guarantee you that Palo Alto doesn't care.

I have not yet switched to another software.

We did not previously use a different solution.

Initially, we used another solution but that was not for firewall security. Rather, it was for compliance.

We adopted our cloud journey last year, and while developing the cloud, we took all security precautions. CSPM was a priority solution, and we have apt.

We did not have a previous solution.

We've used the solution for ten years. I'm not sure what we used before. 

I have no experience from similar solution in my career experience.

I have not used a similar cloud networking security platform before.

I have not used a similar solution.

Previously we used only Microsoft with Defender for Cloud. However, we wanted to have our security centralized. Check Point through the infinity portal achieves that feature.

We used Azure Defender for the cloud. It is good, however, I liked more the form and the trust of Check Point.

This is the most effective platform I have worked with.

Before Dome9, we just used native.

What we were doing natively wasn't sufficient. Once we saw what we were capable of doing with Dome9, that showed us all the stuff that we weren't doing with the native stuff that we could and should have been doing. Because it was so buried in there, we didn't know about it or how to do it. So, Dome9 helped us learn from a native tool perspective that there are other things that you can be doing with those tools that may not be that apparent.

We have not found a more centralized, powerful, or complete solution than Check Point Cloud Guard Posture Management, neither before nor now.

This tool and Spectral are some of the best tools we've tried. Using both is excellent.

We had never used or known a tool like Check Point CloudGuard.

A centralized tool with the potential of Check Point CloudGuard Workload Protection is not found in other manufacturers. We have not had such a solid and secure solution.

For solutions as complete as this multi-cloud, we had not been able to test.

We did not use another solution prior to this one.

The solution helps save our security team time. Before we had Dome9, our security team had to go through each problem and check it. Nowadays, we just need to analyze one report and use one tool. We don't have to go through all the accounts with all their data. Dome9 is saving them approximately 10 hours a week.

We implemented Dome9 as soon as we started having some production services on our current environment and started our cloud journey three years ago. 

No, we are unfamiliar with the other solutions of the same kind.

We opted for CloudGuard CNAPP over other solutions mostly due to its flexibility.

We really liked this other solution offered by a smaller company, and then a larger company bought it. I forgot the company's name, but the roadmap just went to pieces when it was bought out. All the tech people left the company then the chief technical officer resigned. It was terrible.

This was the first time we used any CSPM solution.

If we were using a similar but not as extensive solution. We were using Darktrace.

We are currently running Palo Alto Prisma and evaluating it together with Dome9.

We had been using iptables on Linux servers but it was missing centralized management. Also, configuring firewall security rules was quite a nightmare, especially testing.

We have assessed several, and Dome9 is the only one that we have used continuously, and it has begun to replace other solutions as Dome9 rolls out new features.

We did not use another solution prior to this one.