We don't have any issues with CloudGuard's performance or scalability. 

As it's available as SaaS and subscription offering it can be scalable deepening upon the number of workloads for which support is required.

Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is scalable.

We have not yet tested the solution at that scale. It is just a starting point. We may add more applications and more load to it. We will have to see how scalable the solution is.

So far, so good. We have plans to increase its usage, but it depends on the collaboration with multiple groups.

We have been using it with a small group in our organization. We want to make sure that this group benefits from it, and then we can use that use case and expand that use case throughout the organization. Currently, it is being used for a small group, and there is an ongoing effort to make it more visible.

Check Point CloudGuard is scalable.

CloudGuard is scalable. I don't need to worry about it.

The tool presents very good and functional scalability. To this day, we have not presented any problems.

Scalability, particularly in workload protection, is an area that needs improvement. It is challenging to roll out workload protection to different teams, and there is room for enhancement in this aspect.

It is scalable. You can do it, but you need to redo the setup for each and every additional account and visibility. It is scalable. It is just not quickly scalable.

It scaled up for us for hundreds of accounts.

The solution is scalable.

It's a highly scalable solution and integration with the public cloud is very good. The way you can centralize the dashboard of entire cloud infra is a very impressive.

Scalability is not an issue. There are a number of workload licenses that need to be procured, then it is straightforward.

There are between eight to 10 security admins and auditors who have access to Dome9.

Our complete cloud workload is managed through Dome9.

I am impressed by its reliable performance, and I recommend it to other business enterprises.

Scalability really isn't an issue with everything in the cloud. That's the essence of a cloud product: the scalability you get compared to on-prem.

I give the scalability a nine out of ten.

Dome9 is very good in terms of scalability.

CloudGuard Posture Management is scalable, as it is a SaaS product.

My impression was that the scalability was very good. It is a super scalable product.

It has great scalability. It's very fast and precise.

The tool has excellent scalability.

CloudGuard's scalability is decent. They're switching to a new onboarding methodology that I'm not in love with, but I think we'll find a way to make it work and continue to scale. It has been good.

I am happy with scaling since there is comprehensive security compliance in the organization.

CloudGuard is a SaaS solution, so it scales with your cloud. When you get hundreds of firewalls, perhaps 200 or 300 of one, then the complexity becomes the same in CloudGuard as the thing that you want to solve in the cloud, so I don't think that they can extend to that.

I have a deployment that is European-wide, multi-cloud, with approximately 480 virtual machines. There were a lot of other components as well, so it was a really huge use case.

In terms of cloud solutions, the scalability was a fairly simple and entirely software-driven approach.

It scales well.

In terms of increasing usage, it all depends on the size of the company. If we grow, the number of the users will grow as well.

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is scalable. My company has more than 1000 users. 

The solution works well for us, both on-premises and on the cloud. 

Providing security for a multi-cloud networking system has been awesome.

The entire deployment process took place smoothly, and we were impressed by the vendor team.

It provides good scalability.

The solution is scalable. However, the issue is when you buy the license, you buy the quantity of data to do the intelligence, not to keep the data stored on the cloud. We pay to correlate one terabyte of information for only one month.

I am impressed by the performance.

The scalability has been smart, and I am really impressed.

It scales well. The only thing to watch out for is the licensing. We just ran into that. Dome9 will take how much you have from a cloud deployment standpoint, and you need to be appropriately licensed for it. You can't have too many cloud assets or you will exceed your license, then it stops reviewing the data that was added later.

Everyone who uses Dome9 is security at the moment. We are probably going to change that, as we are probably going to expand it in the future. We will have a lot of developers in there pretty soon.

The solution offers excellent performance.

The solution is incredibly scalable and managed by Check Point Infinity Portal infrastructure.

This product offers excellent availability; its scaling is managed by the manufacturer.

The solution is able to handle a large number of vulnerabilities, so it seems to be able to scale well.

It is very scalable since we only need to buy licenses for more protective items. However, the overall license is very protective.

Dome9 integrates security best practices and compliance regulations into the CI/CD, across cloud providers. We are also currently integrating our ancillary environment on the domain. At the moment, we have more than 500 servers and domes protected by Dome9. Therefore, it's a tool that can accomplish security for almost all call environments.

Dome9 is used by the technical team. It is utilized in production and nonproduction. It is also integrated with Azure along with Office 365.

Dome9 has 100 percent adoption rate, as all our environment will be integrated with it. 

There are two types of users:

• My team who implements the domain.
• The infrastructure team who looks at the report. There are three guys on the infrastructure team.

The solution is scalable. We have it run on about 30 projects without any issues.

Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is scalable. We haven't run into any scale issues and we have scaled significantly over the last six years.

We plan on expanding it into some of the newer capabilities that Check Point is coming out with.

I would rate the scalability of the solution as a ten out of ten.

In terms of scalability, CloudGuard requires a little bit of work. Sometimes it does take longer for the checks to come through, but it depends on how busy you are in the cloud. 

We have yet to encounter any issues with scalability.

The tool always performs very well. All the upgrades happen automatically. We haven't had a problem with it.

We haven't attempted to scale the product because there are no additional plug-ins or add-ons.

The scalability is good.

I didn’t encounter any scalability challenges. According to the vendor, we are far from the limit that has been tested by the vendor so far.

Never a problem.

When it comes to scaling up, it's very easy to just add licenses. But to prior implementing this solution, you need to have a good accounting of all your assets to onboard on this platform. CloudGuard is good for bigger, more complex cloud infrastructures. But if you have only one cloud infrastructure, I don't think you will see much advantage over other cloud posture management. That's why this is useful mainly for bigger enterprises with multiple cloud instances and different cloud environment providers. 

Dome9 is very scalable, although as it scales it can become quite costly. As such, for some of our customers, scaling is not possible because it is cost-prohibitive.

The scalability of Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is good.

The solution is scalable.

I have no concerns with the scalability of this solution.