I don't know the initial proposed amount, but the procurement team looked at the market and compared Prisma and CloudGuard, then settled on one solution.

Cost is based on number or Workload in case of Prisma & Dome9 

For Aquasec it's based on a number of application workloads

For Conformity it's based on the number of accounts 

The setup cost is really low compared to the license cost. However, it's a good investment if you want to secure the cloud ecosystem.

The price is on the higher end.

The pricing is extremely competitive.

It is difficult to contextualize the pricing because we are used to Indian pricing and licensing. In India, there is very little interaction with North America and the private sector regarding pricing.

The licensing part still needs some work. The issue that I have is that we do not use all the services in the cloud, but sometimes, CloudGuard identifies them as an asset. 

We have the enterprise-level license and we renew it annually because it is worth the cost.

The pricing of CloudGuard increases annually, and we don't see the value because we don't use all the features. We're primarily using CSPM and maybe Workload Protection. We did the Kubernetes part and used Network Explorer as a one-off. We only used Network Explorer for diagnostics. 

We use the Intelligence module for CSPM but don't analyze network traffic with CloudGuard. It's an expensive subscription, so we don't use the intelligence part.

Whenever an investment is made in a security tool, it is high due to many factors. that said, investing in security will provide economic returns in the short or long term since it will greatly lighten workloads and provide security.

I find CloudGuard CNAPP's pricing and licensing to be flexible, allowing us to explore new features without hard limits. Currently, we operate under an enterprise agreement with the flexibility to utilize the tools we need effectively.

Its price is very fair.

Licensing and costs are straightforward, as they have a baseline of 100 workloads within one license and no additional charges.

Also, it does not have any impact on cloud billing because the data is shared using API calls, which is well within the limit of free API calls.

The complete solution should be provided in a single license including storage, as Check Point charges extra for logic.

We thoroughly examined the software and market offerings and found that CloudGuard solutions are reliable and dependable for their good work and globally accepted happy feedback by partners and users.

The setup cost is low and the implementation process is quite smooth.

Pricing is low in comparison to various competitors in the market.

Licensing and renewal of the agreement are effortless.

The setup cost is very affordable and very easy. Integration with the public cloud is very easy. The licensing calculation is also very good and no manual effort is required.

The licensing and costs are straightforward, as they have a baseline of 100 workloads (number of instances) within one license with no additional nor hidden charges. If you want to have 200 workloads under Dome9, then you need to take out two licenses for that. Also, it does not have any impact on cloud billing, as data is shared using the API call. This is well within the limit of free API calls provided by the cloud provider.

This platform offers modern security for threats that will arise in any organization.

The license fee is high.

Check Point always manages good prices and costs in the tools they sell.

The installation of the product is very reliable, and fast, and it is a very competitive cost in the market.

The cost is a bit high, however, the investment is worth it.

CloudGuard is fairly priced.

The setup cost is good, and the pricing depends on the size of the company.

In the beginning, the price of CloudGuard was cheap, whereas now it is not.

I haven't gotten the latest pricing, but my advice is that you need to balance it out with your cloud business cases. It all depends on how many machines, servers, and the size of the cloud that you have. It's probably not useful if you have only a few machines and some network security groups to manage them. In this case, it's not something that you need.

CSPM is an invaluable resource for any organization that makes use of cloud computing. It can assist organizations in improving their cloud security posture, reducing the risk of cyberattacks, and adhering to industry norms and regulations.

The tool's pricing is moderate. Its licensing costs are yearly. 

The setup cost is high.

The setup cost is high, however, the pricing terms vary based on the size of an organization.

If I compare the price of CloudGuard, Palo Alto is more expensive and others are less expensive. CloudGuard CNAPP is in the middle.

The pricing is moderate. It's not too expensive or overly cheap. It is comparable to other solutions. 

The setup cost and licensing terms are always good.

It's very important to have a reliable and good partner. The proactivity helps us to see the existing needs and check with Check Point what characteristics are required.

It is always important to have access to a partner to help you with costs, and requirements and to help you choose the best option within Check Point.

The cost and setup are relatively good for most enterprises.

The pricing is tremendous and super cheap. It is shockingly cheap for what you get out of it. I am happy with that. I hope that doesn't get reported back and they increase the prices. I love the pricing and the licensing makes sense. It is just assets: The more stuff that you have, the more you pay.

It is essential to validate the costs and have a good representative for Check Point that can provide security in the tools. They need to be able to understand your needs as clients.

Prepare to pay, since the tool is expensive. However, I recommend talking to a Check Point partner so that they can provide you with everything related to the tool along with costs.

The best option is to have a partner who helps them with support in addition to helping with cost issues since pricing is not public.

The recommendation is always to have a provider or a partner that can generate and answer all questions about the solutions and provide costs and analysis to see if the solutions are what the company needs.

I'm glad I don't have to pay the licensing fee. Everything in this field is very expensive. I don't have a say in the matter.

Right now, we have licenses on 500 machines, and they are not cheap.

I suggest that you pay attention to the product pricing because while there are no tricks, and the licensing model is transparent, the final numbers may surprise you.

Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is expensive.

The license for CloudGuard Posture Management is about $80 a year, and it's based on your cloud footprint, not the number of users. So you could have a million users, and it doesn't matter. 

They support either annual licensing or hourly. At the time of our last negotiation, it was either one or the other, you could not mix or match. I would have liked to mix/match. 

The solution’s pricing is a little bit high. I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten on a scale of one to ten, where one is the lowest price, and ten is the highest price.

The price of this solution should be reduced so that it is more affordable to scale - specifically for features like Intelligence Pro.

The solution offers an excellent price, benefit, and installation relationship. Thus far, Check Point has offered us this very successful relationship.

Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.

From a pricing perspective, they are pretty expensive. You can find better offerings on the market.

The licensing costs for this solution are on a yearly basis.

We have a subscription that is paid annually. The cost is reasonable. 

In order to obtain better pricing, I would advise taking into account the existing number of devices and add a forecast of the number of devices to be added in the coming year or two. The company has multiple modules that you purchase independently or in groups, depending on your needs.

The licensing model is based on the size of your cloud infrastructure. So to estimate what you will pay, you need to count each and every asset. And when I say assets, that means every application, database, server, or virtual network on your cloud infrastructure. 

I'd like to see more flexibility in their licensing model. It's based on assets, but we all know that assets keep on growing. I would recommend a flexible, upgradeable license, so when you add assets, they can easily bill you or upgrade you.

It is a very straightforward licensing model that is based on the number of assets you are discovering and managing with the solution.

Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is always known as a good solution but an expensive one. When you're using Cisco, Check Point, or Palo Alto, you know that you will pay more, but you know that it will work.

It is a standard licensing fee, with no additional costs.