DX Spectrum Previous Solutions
DC
reviewer1897431
Senior Network Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
We previously used HP OpenView, but DX Spectrum is more comprehensive.
View full review »CL
Calvin Lane
InfoVista Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
I did use a performance and fault management tool, but that is a really old solution. It was a tool built by a consulting company called INS, going back to the early 2000s possibly.
Another tool I used was something called Infovista, which is a suite of tools, so it has more than just fault management. It was primarily for performance management.
View full review »UW
Uwe Wächter
Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
We had NetView from IBM. We switched over to DX Spectrum because we were just flooded with events, and we had no idea about the root cause of the event. We tested the other solutions at this time, like HPO View, but they never gave us the view that we have in Spectrum now in terms of pinpointing where the problem is.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
AppNeta by Broadcom vs. DX Spectrum
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about AppNeta by Broadcom vs. DX Spectrum and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
NR
Nuno
Solution Architect at Infosys
We did not previously use a different solution, but I have done many migrations from other vendors. At the moment, the only thing which doesn't make CA Spectrum a market leader is its price.
View full review »HR
Haytham Rahmy
CSI manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
I was a vendor for CA before they were acquired by Broadcom.
View full review »We were using SolarWinds previously and it just did not offer a lot of the features that CA Spectrum does. CA worked really hard to create a strategic partnership with us which is very important. Being a large company, we have a wide range of products that we use from various different vendors and we need that support. We chose CA over IBM, and also SolarWinds. So again, the scalability of the product, the ease of implementation, and the account team was way easier to work with than any of the other vendors.
View full review »SW
Stuart Weenig
Senior NMS Architect at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We did not have a previous solution. I came onto the scene to help clean up and modernize a lot of our operations. This was one of the things we looked at.
As one of my operation managers put it, we were driving down the road at 80 miles an hour with the windscreen painted black. Sometimes, we would roll down the windows and stick our head out the window, but we recognized it as a big gap. It was something that we needed: good fault monitoring.
View full review »ZH
ZuherHaija
Director at Starways
I have used OpenText before DX Spectrum.
View full review »RK
itarchit489981
IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
We used several solutions prior to this one. The reason we switched is that the combination was causing a problem and we needed to standardize.
View full review »RK
itarchit489981
IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
We have extensive knowledge when it comes to using Spectrum. Some teams around me are using Zabbix.
View full review »We were using CA Performance Center, and CA Spectrum is a logical extension of CA Performance Center. Between our management and CA themselves putting on the full-court press for sales, we decided to go that route.
View full review »I've never had to switch from another product to CA Spectrum. Most places I have worked either already had Spectrum or I've recommended it/implemented it as a new tool.
View full review »This organization previously used the IBM Tivoli product.
View full review »Our company merged with another company, and since the merger, our company has outsourced all our LAN and WAN management. All our network tools have been at our vendors and we have had no access to them. Pre-merger, the second company did everything internally and used Spectrum as their network management platform. Now, with the integration of both networks, network management is coming in-house.
I recently attended a conference primarily to take a look at the CA Spectrum product and its capabilities regarding what advantages it's going to have when they bring in it.
View full review »We didn't have any other solution before. We were using some supplemental products. We knew we were missing that managers tool. As we looked at other products, we decided to make sure we had the funding for this one.
We chose this product because of its scalability and also we had confidence in CA, which we didn't have in any of the other vendors.
The most important criteria when selecting a vendor were scalability, stability and support.
View full review »We previously used lots of tools, such as PRTG, IBM Tivoli, and SLMO. CA spectrum helped our organization automate fault management across multi-vendor and multi-technology infrastructure. Spectrum integration with service desk helped us reduce manual effort.
View full review »We have used no other solution prior to this one. We've been using the same thing for a long time.
View full review »LG
Luis Miguel Goez Mora
Big Data Architect en Seguros SURA at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We did not previously use a different solution.
View full review »FB
Fritz Buetikofer
Senior IT Manager at a university with 5,001-10,000 employees
I did not previously use a different solution. At the time (fall 1990), there were only very few products available, where just two or three of them had a graphical visualization.
View full review »I am not sure how they knew they needed to invest in a new solution, but when I got in, Spectrum was on the rise of being implemented. Before this, we had NetCool.
When I select a vendor, first, I look at the product; how viable it is. Second, I look at the support that I'm going to get from the vendor. Those are the two major things that I look for.
View full review »I don't believe they were using anything prior to this. I think it was on an "on-call, this-is-down" basis.
View full review »We previously used lots of tools, such as PRTG and IBM Tivoli. CA Spectrum helped our organization automate fault management across multi-vendor and multi-technology infrastructure. Spectrum integration with service desk helped us reduce manual effort.
View full review »This was before my time at the company.
View full review »Many enterprises have something called "tool sprawl." Over time you invest in tools and all of a sudden you step back and realize there is some overlap in the tool set that you have. You have tool X and tool Y and they each do some different things but then they do some of the same things as well. You realize you have some overlap.
We had a maintenance contract come to term. We paused and listed all of our tools and listed their functionality and made a matrix, then added to that what we wanted to look for in the future. Then we stepped back and we evaluated different vendors, and CA was one of those vendors. We looked at their offerings and from that process we decided to go with a CA suite of infrastructure management tools.
View full review »DM
Marais David
Network Manager at SMA
We are moving from CA Spectrum because it is not a solution for us. We are moving to an open-source solution that is less expensive.
View full review »A couple other solutions. It cancelled some of those out.
We switched because it was a bigger thing. We swapped so we could have support for just one monolithic thing, as opposed to a lot of little things.
It just had more support, we could call somebody. It was very complex business software. We probably still don't use 40% of the solution at this point.
View full review »DZ
Daniel Alejandro Zuleta Zahr
Developer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
It was the first solution that we used when I started working. Right now, we are trying Naemon (Nagios). Here is my comparison:
Raw monitoring:
Naemon has a lot more flexibility, i.e., you can script and monitor anything with it, giving you more options than CA Spectrum.
Performance:
CA Spectrum is a lot better. The way they have for consulting SNMP in bulk is great, thus reducing the load a lot. It has around four times more performance with CA Spectrum.
Administration:
CA Spectrum offers you templates, Discovery tools, menus, etc.
In Nagios, we had to develop our own administration tools in order to discover and maintain over 10K devices. This needs a high understanding of the solution.
Business logics:
Here, it is a big win for CA Spectrum. With the events, you can make any of them interact with each other, even with different devices. I can’t think of any business logic that I wouldn’t be able to implement. (I am not saying it is easy, but with a lot of thinking, most of them could be done).
In Nagios, each service runs as an individual check.
View full review »When I started, we were already using the solution and, as far as I know, it has been with us for 5-10 years. We've used it for quite some time.
When looking for a vendor, the application is most important. That's what stays with you the longest period of time. Again, you may not have to call support and you may not have to deal with sales very often, but the application is the one thing that you're constantly involved with.
View full review »I previously used Nagios and Zabbix, but CA Spectrum is more efficient.
View full review »I’ve worked with free tools such as Zabbix / Nagios. Right now, we only work with CA products and, as I’ve written, Spectrum is the way to go when you need networking monitoring.
View full review »CA NSM, Solarwind
View full review »Before choosing Spectrum, we used an open-source solution called Nagios. We also used a monitoring tool from BMC called PEM, Patrol Enterprise Management. In 2009, our bank decided to implement the complete suite of tools for IT management and delivery from CA. It's a strategic decision that we took six or seven years ago and we're happy with the switch.
View full review »I am not aware of any previous solutions.
View full review »JE
Joao Evangelista
Presales Consultant at a tech consulting company with 501-1,000 employees
We previously used a different solution, and we switched mainly because the company needed scalability.
We were using Zabbix, a similar product, at the time, and we had a custom poller written in C and six servers to make it run. However, to get it past 12k elements (the break point for this solution), we would have to redo the entire file system using GFS from Red Hat to allow simultaneous write for a shared storage area. So, when we presented the project, the company realized it was time to invest in an enterprise solution. CA Spectrum was the winner after a series of tests and PoC process with the suppliers.
To install CA Spectrum and discover the network, it required half a day, back in 2008. Some of the competitors couldn’t complete the PoC after one week.
And CA Spectrum offered also a variety of OOTB features such as an easy certification process, VLAN discovery and other stuff.
It was the first ever solution I tried and it worked so I never had a chance to work on other solutions. This applications works best on medium to large-sized organizations.
View full review »There were three companies we looked at. Spectrum was chosen for its flexibility, for its ability to manage all device types, and ease of growth for our environment. Nothing scales like Spectrum.
View full review »We were using another CA product. We had to integrate that system with other systems, but it lacked the API. We decided to upgrade to APM for that reason.
View full review »We've been using Spectrum as long as I've been with the company.
View full review »The previous product did not scale and it was very basic. If you need enterprise network and server monitoring & alerting there are very few options out there.
View full review »We used to have Nagios, OpenNMS, etc. but they are not very efficient monitoring tools when compared with Spectrum and eHealth.
View full review »We weren't using anything before Spectrum. We needed a product to monitor our network equipment for these type of things.
Recently, I opted for an open-source tool, due to the budget constraints of the place where I currently work.
View full review »We did not use a previous solution.
View full review »I have used and implemented the old product, CA Infrastructure Management, which included Spectrum, but also I am implementing CA UIM.
View full review »FS
Fabio Andre M. Sant' Anna
Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
We tested other tools to see how well they met our needs; however, we did not see satisfactory results, and they had the same functionalities as what we already used.
View full review »For many years, we used Navios to monitoring our infrastructure. Then, when we started to work with Spectrum, we had some cultural difficulties trying to get used to a new tool and getting the technical people to use it. For a while, we were running Spectrum and Navios at the same time. Today, we only use Spectrum with the ATMs and self-service terminals. There is also a cultural transformation in relation to the digital transformation, so we are working on moving to UIM.
View full review »I did not previously use a different solution.
View full review »EP
Edgar Parra
Senior Technical Consultant at The Instillery
I tested different products before Spectrum. Tivoli was one of them, but it was too complicated and troublesome to configure and maintain. I didn’t like the interface of BMC Patrol as it wasn’t very intuitive, and HP OpenView was the same with a very unappealing GUI, and the algorithms used to keep track of changes in the network and root cause analysis very basic. I didn’t switch, it was only that I worked with these tools before working with Spectrum.
View full review »Yes, we used TNG, which was impossible to manage.
View full review »KN
reviewer1395900
Techincal Support at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
One of our customers was using SolarWinds, but have since switched to DX Spectrum because they were issues with it. Once they implemented DX Spectrum, they were able to determine the root cause of their problem and solve it.
View full review »I used another solution in another company, but in my current organization, the solution was already installed.
The great aspect about the CA Spectrum tool is not what it does, but the integration that it provides with the other CA monitoring tools, such as CA APM.
View full review »No, I have been using CA products for almost 4 years now.
View full review »I have been working on Spectrum from day one but I have experience with other similar products. I found Spectrum as being a complete network management solution with a great user friendly GUI.
DR
reviewer1470438
Network Operations & Delivery Head for TSB Bank at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
We are also using Microsoft Network Node Manager.
The main difference is the availability to do the health-check on not only the devices but also some application services. These are in addition to the infrastructure, and with Network Node Manager, it's more based on infrastructure.
Also, the Drill down feature that DX Spectrum provides is something the Network Node Manager typically cannot do, as well as to drill down on a specific case or on a specific device.
That's also a really good feature of DX Spectrum.
View full review »No, I didn't use a different solution. I just have some skills with other umbrella tools, where I was able to see a behaviour and processes which are needed for operation.
View full review »Before we were using the HP solution, but then CA bought them. We like this vendor becuase of the strong network management system. So, what’s important to me is particularly the product more than the vendor. Vendors that integrate would be a nice plus. That’s the main reason we initially actually stayed with CA because the products can talk to each other, which has a good flow.
View full review »Using the tool comes as part of my job because my company uses CA Spectrum for their infrastructure monitoring. Previously, I have used Tivoli Console.
View full review »We didn't use a previous solution.
View full review »I work as a System Integrator and we sell all known NFMs. Spectrum is the best.
View full review »I didn't use a previous solution.
View full review »Yes and I switched to this product as its visualization is better.
View full review »We used many, including HPOW, NetView, and Nagios.
View full review »Previously, we were using open-source solutions.
View full review »No previous solution used.
View full review »No I haven't.
View full review »I didn't use a previous solution. I've always worked with CA Spectrum.
View full review »The client had always used CA Spectrum from its inception.
View full review »We have not used other tools. This solution gives more stability, capacity, quantity and quality, in regards to the monitoring configurations. Besides that, it is an excellent event manager.
View full review »Yes, we used Nagios, and SCOM. It not my decision to switch and I don't know why.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
DX Performance Management vs. DX Spectrum
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about DX Performance Management vs. DX Spectrum and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.