Elastic Security Reviews

It is for our own infrastructure. We are trying to do ELK Stack for everything. We are trying to build our own monitoring solution. For now, we are using it as an alerting solution, and SIEM is going to be our destination.

Its flexibility is most valuable. We can have a number of scenarios, and we can get logs from anything. If we know how to use Logstash, we can tweak it in many ways. This makes the logging search on Elastic very easy.

With Kibana, we can make very beautiful dashboards the way we wanted. It makes sense for the business.

We are paying dearly for the guy who is working on the ELK Stack. That knowledge is quite rare and hard to come by. For difficulty and availability of resources, I would rate it a five out of 10.

We don't have any scalability problems as of now. We have less than 2,000 devices.

We have a contractor who is trying to develop and deploy the ELK Stack for us. He has requested a couple of servers, and we have given those to him. He asked for more RAM and storage for the service, and he will take time developing the custom Logstash scripts that we have asked for.

I find it better than Splunk in terms of cost-effectiveness. For cost-effectiveness, I would rate it a nine out of 10.

It is complex, but you just need to have patience and personnel to develop it. Unless you explore a technology, you won't know what are the pros and cons. I have not seen any cons as of now, but it has miles to go in terms of being equal to Splunk. It is a community-driven technology. So, it will get there.

I would rate this solution a seven out of 10.

The product is for use cases involving observability, visualization, dashboards, analytics, and security.

There is a constant evolution in the product. I think that the solution has a strong roadmap in place. I believe that the tool is going to be a leader in a lot of spaces, considering that it is evolving at a fast rate.

From an improvement perspective, the product should be easier to use for those who don't know query language and have experience with only some basic products in the market.

I have been using Elastic Security for more than three years. My company has a partnership with Elastic Security. My company operates as the solution's reseller, and we also manage the tool's implementation.

It is an extremely stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

It is an extremely scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

Whether the product suits small, medium, or enterprise-sized businesses is something that would depend on how you quantify your risks. Elastic Security is an ideal solution for anybody and everybody because it offers a free version of the solution. Small or medium businesses can use the free version of the tool. The solution has very comprehensive capabilities in the free version itself. Enterprises, large corporations, and government organizations can use the tool's paid version because it supports a lot of features from an analytical perspective. The free version doesn't have many analytical features in it. People who want to have a cybersecurity solution in their environment, which may not be specifically Elastic Security, should know the roadmap and the vision, along with a plan on what they want and how they want to go about with the product they want in their company to see where they want to end up in their cybersecurity journey. Your investments will make a lot of sense if you have a clear vision in mind.

Elastic Security is not an ideal product if you are trying to do something very simple or basic with some check mark activities or an audit to show someone that there is some technology used in the company.

I haven't had any single customer of my company telling me that the support of the product is not good. I believe that the product offers great support. I rate the technical support a nine out of ten.

Positive

I have experience with Elastic Security, Rapid7, and IBM.

I rate the initial setup phase a six or seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

The product's initial setup phase is neither easy nor difficult. It is easy to manage the setup phase if you know how to do it correctly. Complexity comes along as a part of the tool, especially if it is powerful and has a lot of capabilities. If it is very easy to manage the setup phase of a tool, then it is bound to have some limitations.

The solution is deployed on the cloud, on-premises model, or a hybrid cloud.

It can take a few days to get the product up and running. The time required to deploy the tool depends on the use cases of the user.

The product offers an amazing pricing structure. Price-wise, the product is very competitive.

The product has made amazing developments and has gone miles ahead in a short span of time when it comes to its enhanced threat detection and threat response capabilities.

The product has helped manage endpoint security since it serves as a single tool that provides all the functionalities together. After you deploy Elastic Security, you can do everything with it, and there is no need to buy separate products or licenses. Through the setup of Elastic ELK Stack, you can get all the functionalities like SIEM, SOC, threat detection, endpoint detection, user behavior analytics, data analytics, data lake analytics, virtualization, dashboarding, cross-referencing, and threat response.

Elastic Security's most beneficial for security needs steps from the tool's openness. The tool is a highly customizable product, allowing you to play with it as much as you want.

Speaking about real-time data analytics features in Elastic Security improve security posture, the real-time is not real-time natively. You need real-time streaming capabilities, for which you need something like Apache Kafka to stream data. The analytical power of Elastic Security is extremely high. If you can get me data in real-time, I can analyze data in real time with Elastic Security.

The product has introduced generative AI in the tool.

The product has covered all technological advancements a person can think of, and it also has a lot of roadmap for the future development of the solution. The tool is strong and capable.

Elastic Security offers one of the highest integration capabilities I have seen in any kit in the market. The tool offers a lot of out-of-the-box connectors and a lot of certification from a lot of providers across different areas. From a workflow perspective, if you are a customer using a proprietary tool with proprietary mechanisms to manage how work is done, then the integration offered by Elastic Security wouldn't be great. If you have an enterprise-grade product involving firewall solutions, SOC tools, endpoint tools, privilege access management solutions, or any other cybersecurity tools, Elastic Security's integration capabilities would work and help manage your workflows seamlessly.

One of my company's customers told me that the incident response time after the implementation of the product was reduced by half within the first few weeks of the rolling out of the solution in the company.

The product is very user-friendly since it offers generative AI in the dashboard. If you don't know how to do something on the dashboard, you can ask a question, and the solution will guide you. From a user perspective, I would say that the person using the product should be knowledgeable and should know what he wants. The product is not for someone who is a novice. The cybersecurity analyst working on the tool should have a fair understanding of what he wants to achieve with the product. It is okay if a cybersecurity analyst does not know how to write a query in the tool since the product offers help through generative AI. You can ask generative AI how to write a query, and it helps you. Elastic Security can be a bit difficult to use if a person only has experience in SMBs with tools like Zoho. The product can also be difficult for those who have never dealt with query language. It would be easy to move to Elastic Security for those who use Splunk, IBM QRadar, or other enterprise-grade tools.

I rate the overall tool a ten out of ten.

We are using the solution for log management. We use it for monitoring and observing. 

Its search engine is great, and it is really quick. In the beginning, we wanted to search through terabytes of log data, and after that, we decided to search using the solution.

The initial setup is very easy.

It can scale well. 

It's very stable and reliable. 

We use it as an open-source product and do not have to pay for licensing. 

There is a lot of good documentation online if you need to troubleshoot. Everything is clear and easy to follow. 

The solution wasn't designed for monitoring at first. It was for search and stack logs and for working with solutions like Kibana. Therefore, they are a bit weak when compared to traditional monitoring tools. 

They should work to improve their integration and graphical interfaces. Their visuals and graphs need to be better. They need better charts. These already exist in Kibana and should be in this solution as well. 

I've been using the solution for two years. 

The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze. it is reliable, and the performance is good. It'd rate the general stability ten out of ten. 

We can easily scale up, according to our needs. It's easy to expand. 

I'd rate the overall ability to scale up eight out of ten. 

They do not have technical support. They have community support and documentation to help with troubleshooting. We've been happy with the amount of detail we can find online if we need assistance. 

I have not used any other products that are the same. I only use Micro Focus Ops Bridge and SiteScope, which are traditional monitoring tools, so I can't categorize them. They are slow yet they can handle big networks. 

The solution is straightforward to set up. They have documentation on their site that shows how to do everything step by step. Everything is very clear and easy to understand. I'd rate the overall ease of implementation nine out of ten. 

The deployment is fast and only takes hours, not days. 

One person helped me deploy the solution. However, we did not need outside assistance. We did it ourselves. 

The solution is open-source and, therefore, free to use. 

I'm a partner. 

I'd advise others to take advantage of the documentation of the solution in order to get the most out of the product.

In general, I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. 

We use it as a SIEM for monitoring a client's environment.

One of the most valuable features of this solution is that it is more flexible than AlienVault. 

It is difficult to anticipate and understand the space utilization, so more clarity there would be great.

My company has been using this solution for two years.

It is a very stable solution.

The solution is very scalable.

The technical support is adequate.

Neutral

We currently use AlienVault for some clients and Elastic Security for others. We chose Elastic Security because we felt it was the most flexible, cost-effective solution to provide the results needed.

In certain respects, the setup of this solution is more straightforward than other solutions, but in other respects, it's more complex because it needs more fine-tuning than Splunk or AlienVault.

We implemented through an in-house team and it took about two months.

The licensing cost depends on the size of the environment it's monitoring. Everything is based on volume, as with all SIEMs. When compared to other products, the price is average or on the low side.

We evaluated several options, including Monster SIEM, Splunk, and Wazuh.

There's a lot of fine-tuning involved with this solution. When you go to a diner, and the menu has everything on it, and you can't figure out which part to look at first, it's a double-edged sword. You can do everything with this solution, which means you have to figure out which part of "everything" makes sense for your company to do.

I would rate this solution as an eight out of ten. It's a good value for money and a  reliable solution, but it's heavily reliant on appropriate configuration.

I worked for a telco client for the security model of Elastic, but my role was unit manager. I don't have a lot of technical expertise, but I decided on the solution for a client, and I was responsible for the delivery.

I worked with the security of the mobile app. I see all the logs in Elastic for SIEM. I monitored the logging and some logs from the machine for a UNIX system with some use cases like the machine's file system.

This solution is deployed on-premise.

We provide this solution to our customers, which are telcos, in the finance industry, and in retail.

I think that it's a good solution for a SIEM.

Elastic doesn't have the features like other competitors in SIEM. For example, Dynatrace as a solution for SIEM has features that Elastic actually don't have.

With Elastic, you have to build the use cases for the specific requirement. Other products have a simple integration and more use cases to integrate out-of-the-box solutions for SIEM. That's the improvement I would like to see.

The product is stable.

Other products like Splunk are better than Elastic for a SIEM because there are some use cases already available for a client. Elastic doesn't have this, so the user must build the SIEM solution. I think that Elastic has to increase the features for the SIEM.

It's not very complicated to install Elastic, but I didn't deploy it.

I would rate this solution 7 out of 10.

It's a good solution and I would recommend it, but there are other products that have more features that Elastic doesn't have.

Overall, the solution is good.

The machine learning aspect of the solution has been great.

The deployment is not that complicated.

ELK is open-source, and it will give you the framework you need to build everything from scratch.

The SIEM modules in Logstash, need more improvement. In the future, the modules could be more advanced as right now there are only very basic modules.

We are facing an issue with the engineers. In the region, there are not many available. Only a few people might be available in our particular region, which is a problem. 

There isn't really a very good user experience. You need a lot of training. There is an interface with limited options. You need to work with the coding and you need to work with the scripts. It's not simple. If you want to configure something, for example, you need to be a proper programmer.

It would ideal if they had a dashboard. Right now, the only way to see what you need to see is to go through all of the logs. 

I've used the solution for one and a half years.

The stability of the solution is good. However, it depends on the configurations. If the solution is configured properly from the beginning, it will be stable. However, if the solution is not configured from beginning properly, it will not be. This is due to the fact that ELK Elasticsearch gives you the framework only, and the customizations depend on the guys who will be coming to configure everything for the company.

The scalability is good, however, there is a certain level of skill that is needed. Due to the lack of trained engineers in the area, this could be a challenge.

We've reached out to technical support in the past. We found that sometimes communication with them was difficult as there was a lack of understanding. This means that it takes a longer time to reach a resolution. However, in the end, when we have had issues, we were able to resolve them, even if it was a bit delayed. 

I've also worked with LogRhythm and there is no comparison. LogRhythm is the best solution for me. The use cases are better and are readily available. In contrast, with ELK, we need to deploy a lot of things. We need to program people and we need skills and training. We need a lot of things. Even the LogRhythm training is easier than ELK. With ELK, you need to build the customization, rules, everything, from scratch. WithLogRhythm, you just have to enable features.

If a company wants some more specific detailed use cases, then ELK would be better than LogRhythm, however, for a generic use case, LogRhythm is better.

The initial setup is pretty simple and straightforward. It's not overly complex. 

That said, it does require trained specialists, and there just aren't that many in our area. 

Overall, I would rate the setup process at a two out of five. 

The configuration must be done correctly, and that depends on who is configuring it. If the person configuring it, for example, only has an administrator background, he will configure the administrator stuff. If he has a security background, he will configure for security.

We are a partner. 

I'd advise others considering the solution that ELK is a good solution, however, it requires skills and capability. You need to be properly trained with it to get the most out of it. 

I would rate the solution at a five out of ten.

Our primary use case of this solution is for application performance monitoring. We are customers of ELK.

This solution enables us to monitor application performance from Elasticsearch and we can predict some behaviors for applications using ELK. This product is distributed and scalable which is good for us.

The troubleshooting or diagnostic tool can be improved to provide a better understanding of internal behavior and how data is stored. It would also be helpful if they were to release the next version as a plugin or an extension, or as a JAR file, for the latest features. When releasing a new version they currently provide a new stack which means everything needs to be removed before the new version is installed. 

I've been using this solution for five years. 

The solution is generally stable, although with each new upgrade there is an adjustment period. They upgrade versions very regularly and it's hard to keep up. By the time my environment is stable with the previous versions, they are already bringing out a new version. 

Scalability is very good with this product. 

I'm not satisfied with technical support because whenever you raise a case, it goes to some random support person who asks questions about the architecture. It's a waste of time. I'm a platinum customer so each time I raise a request, it should go to a dedicated customer support representative who knows my case. It's very difficult when you work in a highly secure environment to get all the logs and send the logs to them each time. 

The initial setup is easy, but as you begin using the more advanced features like security and authentication with an AM and LM, then it becomes a bit tricky.

Licensing costs are high, they charge based on the nodes and the RAM. If I purchase a license for a 64GB RAM node and then want to have 128GB RAM, I can't because it's not in the contract so I have to pay on top of that. They removed a feature that allows me to provide multiple disks for one node so if I now want to add an extra disk to the volume, I have to buy a license for one extra node. It's very unfair. 

I would recommend this solution for an organization that doesn't require a highly secured environment, because they'll have to deal with the issues of VM upgrades and installations. If it's a highly secured environment like a bank, then I suggest ELK cloud instead of on-prem.

I rate this solution a seven out of 10. 

My use case for the product revolved around conducting demonstrations and testing. It also helped me with tracing ransomware and managing threat scenarios.

The integration with Siemens Endpoint Security in Elastic Security has been beneficial for security. The provided rules are good, making it easy to create and understand rules. Patterns and detections are made through index patterns, requiring some follow-up steps.

In real-time, the impact of Elastic Security on ransomware is significant. For known and repeated ransomware, it can detect and prevent effectively using established signatures and behavioral patterns. However, for new types of ransomware with less complex behaviors or those that modify files minimally, conventional detection methods may struggle. Elastic Security proves to be effective even in challenging cases.

On the cloud, it allows testing of SaaS-based applications, performance evaluations using CDMs and APIs, incident detection within company network infrastructures, and comprehensive management of security services.

Improvements in Elastic Security could include refining and normalizing queries to make them more user-friendly, enhancing the user experience with better documentation, and addressing any latency issues.

I have utilized Elastic Security for approximately three to four months.

I rate the product’s stability an eight out of ten.

Scaling Elastic Security is relatively easy, with a rating of seven out of ten.

The tool's deployment is straightforward. 

I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.