erwin Evolve Overview
What is erwin Evolve?
erwin is used by more than 50,000 professionals in 60+ countries to get big results from their enterprise data initiatives. erwin is the #1 choice in virtually every industry, from government and healthcare to retail and finance.
erwin Modeling provides a collaborative environment to manage enterprise data through an intuitive, graphical interface. With a centralized view of key data definitions, you can leverage information as a strategic asset and more efficiently manage your data resources to save time and money.
erwin Evolve is also known as erwin EA, erwin Business Process, erwin Enterprise Architecture.
erwin Evolve Buyer's Guide
Download the erwin Evolve Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: June 2021
erwin Evolve Customers
AT&T, Bank of America, Chevron, Duke University, ESPN, Fidelity, GE, JP Morgan Chase, KPMG, McGraw Hill, NASA, Pfizer, Royal Bank of Scotland, Teradata, Union Pacific, Vodafone, Wells Fargo.
erwin Evolve Video
What users are saying about erwin Evolve pricing:
- "I estimate that we pay between $40,000 and $50,000 a year for the solution, not including the upfront costs to buy things the first time."
- "The cost is something like $15,000, per license. But I haven't looked at those numbers in three years. It was over $100,000 to initially set everything up and get it all configured."
- "Yearly, our cost is €100,000."
- "On a yearly basis, our licensing costs are 50,000 euro. There are no additional costs because we are on a SaaS model."
- "The licensing enables you to differentiate between people who edit the content and the people who consume it. We are able to keep the licensing costs down by keeping the "contributor" licenses to a minimum, and we then just roll out the content in a read-only version for the rest of our users."
- Highest Rating
- Lowest Rating
- Review Length
Showingreviews based on the current filters.
Director IT Architecture at QAD
Real UserTop 20
Jun 19, 2020
Enables us to present data and objects visually, in diagrams, and to make them available via the web
What is our primary use case?We use EA Agile for enterprise architecture, which means that we want to catalog and keep track of all of the architectural pieces of our enterprise, including processes, applications, servers, and locations. We catalog 24 primitive/primary objects with the tool. The purpose is to provide the employees with a website, a navigable information source, of anything that makes up the enterprise. They can look up all of the servers in here. They can look up the applications, processes, security elements, and so forth. It's publishing information and sharing all the details — the architectural… more »
Pros and Cons
- "One of the most valuable features is the website that sits on top of the database. There's a database of objects and how they are related, and you can make views and diagrams and visual elements out of that information on the website. The website is the part that is called Evolve and we use the Evolve Designer and publish the website out to our employees. They can click around and navigate and search, etc."
- "What they need to do is to consolidate more of their products. For example, I was just looking and I couldn't figure out what erwin DT is. It's on the website but it would help if they could put information together and make it more clear as to what products they have and how they work with other things."
What other advice do I have?Start small. Start with the projects that you can get value out of it. Don't try to boil the ocean or to map the whole world. Say to yourself, "I'm creating a map," like Google does while they're driving around in their street-view cars. Figure out what your initial goal is and use the tool to gain that goal. If you have success there, go on to another one. It's an approach you could apply almost anywhere. The biggest thing I've learned from using the solution is that it's really hard to document the data usage of your company. That's one area that we're pretty weak in. At least in our…
Sr. Enterprise Architect at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Feb 5, 2020
We can model and diagram-out system interfaces as a geographically distributed team, but integration with other solutions is not easy
What is our primary use case?We do a lot of system interface analysis. We have about 40 systems that we rolled up and manage at the CIO level, in the office where I work. We do system analysis: system coordination, systems that are being retired, systems that are merging together, systems that are consuming other capabilities resulting in an older system being shut down. We organize, manage, and administer the funding that flows to those 40 different systems. We use the tool to model and analyze the decisions we make about those 40 systems. Those kinds of decisions are helped with the analysis we do and the modeling that… more »
Pros and Cons
- "I can send images in the PDF form, along with the relationships and the associations that are a very important part of what we do. It can show what is affected and what is impacted by a certain change in one area of the system architecture or enterprise architecture. I can very quickly draw those issues and topics to the fore."
- "The solution's integration capabilities with other tools in our system has not been all that well done. We have people who use ARIS, who use System Architect and, of course, Visio. erwin has very limited ways to import and export from those kinds of tools. It's not a very easy thing to do."
What other advice do I have?Start with the basics and get a fundamental understanding of how the suite is configured. There is a modeling suite, an object analysis suite — the object window — and the analytical tools. I love the web deployment, the Evolve capability. That is really nicely done. The ability to collaborate across geographically distributed installations seems to be working well for us. I wish it had more API-type interface exchanges with other tools that made it much easier to transfer things to and from something like System Architect, and not to have to go through a lot of man-hours to recreate what we…
Learn what your peers think about erwin Evolve. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2021.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Senior Business Process Management Architect at a pharma/biotech company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Jul 2, 2020
Helped us to define the configuration of our SAP software
What is our primary use case?We are using it for our enterprise architecture reference, describing everything with it. We are describing our business process and we are trying to describe our data catalog. We are describing our complete applications assets, and we are interfacing to the CMDB of our providers. We are also managing some roadmaps for main transformation programs. We have also linked it to our documentation repository, so we have a description of our data documents.
Pros and Cons
- "The feature that stands out for me is the ease of configuring objects and the screens to show them. It's really easy to add a new type of object in this reference. Creating a new type of object, using it, and evolving it a little bit in terms of what we can document about it are the main features that made us decide to use this provider."
- "They have improved the search engine a little bit but it can always be improved more. The more data you put inside it, the more you want to use it."
What other advice do I have?Start small. Even if you are thinking big, start small. Use the first object and, after that, make it evolve. The biggest lesson I have learned from using this product is that because the product is really easy to configure and it's easy to create new things with it, sometimes you are expecting more from your contributors than they can do. The tool allows you to publish what you have. It's cool for that. We are using it to document what we are transforming. We have decided to document our process applications and interfaces, which is a longer project. We are documenting the project as nodes or…
Independent Consultant at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
The tool was difficult to use, but I liked that it mapped out processes
What is our primary use case?We were trying to evaluate and compare it with other architecture tools. One of my colleagues, a servicing data architect, was trying to create a use case for one of his more recent projects, where he services an auto loan. I was trying to create a process around when some of the dealers sell an automobile, procure an automobile, and finance the automobile, then sell the automobile and get their money.
Pros and Cons
- "I really liked that it mapped out processes and was able to attach the data model to the appropriate process. You could map out the process, then when you got down to a specific couple of data elements, you could attach the table in the database that supported that process. You could connect it with erwin Data Modeler for that."
- "It could have had a more streamlined navigation. It seemed that when you went to the explorer panel, there were just so many different ways of doing the work that I could not remember, "How did I do this? How did I get to that point in that model to get back to it?" If I wanted to build a new one, where do I start? It just seemed like there was such a smorgasbord of ways of doing it that it was just overwhelming."
What other advice do I have?For what it says it can do, it does a good job, but using it is too difficult. When the young lady demonstrated it, we thought, "Oh, this is great." Then, when we went to go use it, and thought, "Oh, my God, it was just too difficult." Biggest lesson learnt: The ability to really do a function framework and integrate the data associated with the function. I would rate it as a four out of 10. If you're going to break it out by its functionality, I would give it a seven or eight, but then I would put the ease of use very low. We didn't move forward with it. We couldn't demonstrate it to our…
Enterprise Architect at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees
Mar 18, 2020
Automatic diagramming saves hours of work, automatically generating diagrams based on updated data
What is our primary use case?I mostly use it for enterprise architectural work, doing business process modeling and high-level strategic modeling with its capabilities. Others in our company are using it for IT infrastructure, such as aligning requirements to system solutions; that kind of architectural work. We don't use it much for the data architecture capability it has. That's actually where Erwin started, it's their strength. They're one of the premier companies in that space. I'm not a database architect, but I'm aware that it's a great product in that space. We just haven't used it much for that. We just upgraded… more »
Pros and Cons
- "I have not seen capabilities for web-sharing and interaction with the architecture from any other supplier. It's a great capability..."
- "By placing the data and the metadata into a model, which is what the tool does, you gain the abilities for linkages between different objects in the model, linkages that you cannot get on paper or with Visio or PowerPoint. That is a huge discriminator."
- "With the Excel importing, the "up to date" part is the challenge. If we had a real-time integration, we could keep things up to date for whatever kinds of change points we had. With Excel, it is more that you have to export from one system then import it to another, so it's better for data that doesn't change that often."
What other advice do I have?Erwin EA Agile is very easy to use. It has great web-sharing of architecture to many different stakeholders, so that you can socialize your architecture. One of the things I was most interested in, in the 2018 version we just deployed, is the pan and zoom capability. I haven't tried it yet because we just got it running yesterday. We have not used a lot of the solution's integration capabilities with other tools in our system, yet. What we have done is a lot of Excel import and export, and that works fantastically. I've done some experimentation with the Visio import and export, and that is…
Global Enterprise Architect and Catalogue of Business Solutions Manager at a recruiting/HR firm with 10,001+ employees
Jan 28, 2020
Enables people, not in the same location, to access IP data in a simple way using the web interface
What is our primary use case?We use it for the registration of any IT solution. This solution is now linked to our CMDB (our technical asset management database). We also use it for its business capabilities support, e.g., business subjects or business data used by each application to understand what we are doing with solutions and trying to rationalize it as much as possible for our entire worldwide team. erwin is for all users and the chief distributor of the web interface. From the admin side, we are using the back-end of erwin to try and do data modeling. People use this solution for many IT functions. It can be an IT… more »
Pros and Cons
- "We use erwin Evolve to publish to the website. This allows us to enable publishing our website using parameterisation features. In a very fast, quick way, we can publish a table or chart onto a website."
- "The way that we are using it for application management, we have several KPIs. We want to follow and monitor them regarding a number of solutions. We cannot calculate this today. We would like real-time calculations along with the KPIs in order to improve the user experience. We would like the tool to be able to display this, not only as signals, but as charts."
What other advice do I have?We didn't have the perfect design on the paper before starting to implement it. We just started to implement it, then tried to use it. It is better to try and hope than wait and miss out. Adoption is not connected to any tool with enterprise architecture. The capacity of people to feel the benefit of enterprise activities will be from going through education and a commitment on behalf of key people. I see a willingness in the company to add new features. Though, I don't feel they are pushing the solution hard enough. I would rate the solution as an eight (out of 10).
IT Director at a construction company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Apr 13, 2020
Helped us come to a standardization of our processes and procedures across multiple divisions
What is our primary use case?We have grown through acquisition so we have a number of different divisions throughout our company. There was an initiative to develop standard operating procedures to be used across all the divisions. We needed a way to be able to present the information to our employees in an easy to consume manner. We use Casewise to be able to capture that information and store it and we use Evolve to be able to present it in a user-friendly way, for consumption.
Pros and Cons
- "There is a model behind it. It's really nice that the Evolve front-end, as it builds a website, keeps those relationships in mind. You can even go to a procedure and see all the applications that are related to it. Then you can go into that application and see all the standard operating procedures that that application is a part of. It's just very connected."
- "I would like it to be easier to make changes and then deploy them into production, especially when you have multiple web servers or front-ends. It would be nice to make a change and then have it propagate to the production servers in a more automated fashion."
What other advice do I have?Think about the overall processes and governance of your company. If you're trying to do it as a business management system, just getting to consensus on the content may be the most challenging aspect. You have to plan for enough time to get build the content before you can actually put it into Casewise. Also, think through the object model and the relationships. Try to get that done correctly upfront. It's better to put enough design and thought upfront and it will pay dividends down the line. We would like to use the solution's collaborative web modeling capability, but we took a more…
Data Architect at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees
Aug 15, 2019
Offers clarity about our data and is scalable with good technical support
What is our primary use case?Our primary use case for this solution is as data modeling tool.
How has it helped my organization?Enterprise Architecture improved our organization by giving clarity over the data that is available.
What needs improvement?I would like to see an improvement in the output of the solution.
For how long have I used the solution?I've been using this solution for about 15 years now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?The solution is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?The scalability is good, but so far we haven't used the shared version. We use the single stand-alone version. We have only three users, and they are all data architects. We don't use any other staff for maintenance. We also…
See 1 more erwin Evolve Reviews
Download our free erwin Evolve Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
- When evaluating Architecture Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- What are some business benefits associated with enterprise architecture?
- Any experience on newer/low-cost cloud based EA Modelling Tools?
- What tips do you have for choosing a suitable enterprise architecture management tool?
- How to export IBM Rational System Architect data into Alfabet Enterprise Architecture Management (by Software AG)?