I had Microsoft Defender to use, so that is why I moved away from ESET.

I've also used McAfee, Trend Micro, and Symantec.

Maybe two years back, ESET was a product that would be a mid-range product. Sentinel One and ESET maybe would compete with each other along with Kaspersky and stuff like that. In contrast, McAfee, Symantec, Defender, and Trend Micro would come in the top bracket in terms of the top performance, along with CrowdStrike and stuff like that.

Nowadays, that scene has changed drastically. Defender is there as a professional, full-throttle product. That's one aspect. Symantec is still there on the top of the pile. McAfee is losing its place since they've messed up with the build and all the stuff. Trend Micro is also almost there on the top of the pile, yet not exactly on top of them, however, they're pretty much there. Brands like CrowdStrike, et cetera, are beginning to step in into the top of the pile in terms of their technology. ESET is also closing that gap in terms of their abilities.

We use ESET or Avast typically. That's all. I know of Kaspersky and it is a very bad antivirus. I don't like it. I don't know why. I find lots of bugs in this software. Symantec, I'm aware of it, however, I don't use it. It's very hard for the computer. McAfee is good for beginners.

We used to use Symantec and Norton. We switched from Symantec and Norton as they are very heavy on the computer. They slowed everything down.

We have used Symantec. My experience with Symantec is really limited. We switched over to ESET. We didn't have a lot of options with Symantec. For example, we wanted something with a lot more options.

I'm also familiar with McAfee. I've also used Norton in the past. They tend to slow down machines. 

We previously used Microsoft Defender but it is not as mature as ESET Endpoint Security.

We have used Symantec, SentinelOne, Trend Micro Apex One, and Trend Micro Office Scan.

The feature I saw on Symantec was not available on the version we were using in our proof of concept of ESET Endpoint Antivirus. However, I would have liked to have tested the EDR solution from ESET.

I previously used Symantec and BitDefender.

Previously we used Norton Antivirus. If I remember correctly, some incidents happened then and we lost confidence in them. That's why we moved to ESET.

I did not previously use a different solution. 

I have not used other solutions prior to ESET Endpoint Security.

I have used Kaspersky and Trend Micro previously.

I have previously used the antivirus software from both McAfee and Norton. In fact, my technical support consultant has been recommending that I go back to Norton, and I'm not against the idea, but I would need to have a better comparison to make the switch.

Previously I had used Avira, which is a German antivirus solution. 

We have also used Kaspersky, but it was very slow.

We have used different solutions and are not necessarily tied to only ESET solutions. It depends on the requirements of the client. For example, ESET EndPoint Security is suitable for clients who need a more complex model of security technology. This solution is good for clients if they have a firewall like Sophos or Sophos Antivirus integrated into their firewall.

I have used nearly all of these kinds of solutions throughout my career, and this is the one that I tend to go back to because it's all there. Specifically, I have used AVG, Norton, Avast, and BullGuard.

ESET does not have a heavy footprint like Norton. 

When I first tried ESET many years ago, it was not as straightforward to use, but it was very good for administration and networks. The fact that it would scan the entire structure of the machine and any drives, in a corporate situation, was quite valuable. After this, I started using it myself and realized just how easy it is to use.

I am working with a new Endpoint Security Company, and the name of the product is Cynet.

I am still working with Cynet.

Instead of Cynet, it is an EDR. It is now extended XDR. It is an extended response.

For Endpoint Security, I use both ESET and Cynet. However, unlike ESET, Cynet is a proactive tool. MDR is included. It is also paired with SOC.

One of the companies I oversee is one of the Mator company's branches, and they use Cisco Endpoint Security, which is a terrible tool when compared to ESET or Cynet.

We've had it since I've been here.

We previously used McAfee. However, it was too heavy for us. It needed too much memory.

I did not previously use other solutions. 

I have not used another solution other than ESET Endpoint Security.

We previously used Kaspersky.

We previously used a different endpoint solution but I don't remember the name. We switched for two reasons. Firstly, in the previous solution, the implementation of the different versions to the endpoint was a little complicated. And secondly, the price. ESET is a more reasonably priced solution for us. 

We used McAfee and Defender previously. We switched to ESET for its cost and functionality.

I was previously using Seqrite. Our internal team has done POC for ESET Endpoint Security and found many positive points. It was for an international company and the migration was simple.

We didn't use a different solution previously, because we started with ESET Endpoint Antivirus.

We didn't previously use a different solution.

I was using Malwarebytes as a stopgap solution, but I'm sure they have a whole corporate strategy. I started using ESET initially because they had a centralized control tool. Maybe Malwarebytes has changed so it's managed in the cloud now. I haven't explored that or used a cloud version of the software.

We were using Sophos. Our MSP had a bad experience with it, so we decided to go with ESET Endpoint Antivirus. We get it through our MSP, and it was a part of the package, and that's why we dropped Sophos.

Sophos had Intercept X on the server-side to protect the files on the server, but we had to pay extra for it to be on the endpoints. We at least had the server version, which was kind of cool.

We have some level of experience with Panda, Kaspersky, and Symantec.

We considered the resources that would be taken, the performance of PCs, the malware detection, product management complexity, and the price factor. Most of our clients switched to ESET.

We are using ESET on-premises, WatchGuard in a hybrid deployment, and Tenable.io as a cloud deployment.

In terms of similar solutions, I used to use CrowdStrike, and we use Cisco AMP. We've been using Symantec as well. 

I've dealt with many security solutions, including Sophos and Cynet. 

Previously I was using SEP, Symantec Endpoint Security, Check Point Endpoint Security, and Sophos. They are all very high-level. 

The company decided to try ESET, so we will have to wait and see.

I have worked with Cylance. It does not have the problem where some machines are missed during the initial setup and discovery process, but it suffers from having too many false positives. I think it is related to how it works, based on machine learning technology. This means that you have to create a lot of exceptions, time and time again, especially for applications that are crucial.

For endpoint security, I'm only working with ESET.

Previously, we used Norman, but it's only an antivirus. ESET is better.

We have only used ESET Endpoint Antivirus.

I was previously using Norton Antivirus.

We didn't previously use a different solution. I did use Kapersky at a different company, but I didn't find it as secure.

I personally use the antivirus product that comes with Microsoft Windows.

We previously use Symantec products and we switched to ESET Endpoint Security because it was less expensive.

ESET is a top Slovak company, renowned in the industry as is their solution. Previously I tried AVG and McAfee solutions, but did not feel my device was really secure.

Yes, as a software distributor I also work with Sophos for example, and the cost-benefit of ESET is better than Sophos.

No, we have not changed.

We also work with Microsoft Defender. From a Microsoft product perspective and stability perspective, I would recommend Defender. From the feature perspective, from an advanced protection perspective, ESET is good. 

Yes, we switched as ESET was easier to use, has management console functions, and the application is cost-friendly for a small business.