The solution is expensive to maintain because it requires frequent updates and ongoing server maintenance. 

The 365 email only costs around $8 per month, per user. 

For all 365 applications, the cost is $12 per month, per user. For comparison, Google Workplace costs $8 per month, per user for all applications. 

Office 365 is mostly free to use. You can also have a pay-later service. The choice depends on the type of license. Exchange functions as a single entity, with higher email capacity. Office 365's licenses differ across categories, each offering varying storage. For instance, a subscription for five employees using Office 365 costs $200 monthly, while setting up an Exchange solution for the same number would demand additional expenses, such as hardware, licenses, and technical support. 

Compared to the other options in the market, the licensing costs attached to Microsoft Exchange seem reasonable.

The pricing model is a bit costly. They should work to lower the cost for the Indian market.

We pay for the solution yearly.

The licensing is integrated with Microsoft 365. Licensing is becoming easier. We can get Exchange in the cloud along with the Microsoft 365 license. We don't have to worry so much about Exchange licenses in the future. It would be deployed in the cloud.

Licensing costs for Microsoft Exchange have increased, but are still fair. For some users, the cost is high considering the number of functions and features they will use. 

For the cloud version, we have to pay. On-premises versions include some licensing, like Office 365 packages. There are variations.

The pricing is reasonable. It's not too expensive. It's comparable to Google, but Google offers fewer features.

The license can be both monthly or yearly. It is not expensive.

Since my company is on Microsoft Cloud, we pay for the licenses per user. Compared to volume licensing, I would say the present licensing cost is not expensive.

Microsoft Exchange itself does not require a license, but users who will have mailboxes will require a license. It depends on the number of users to choose which license. If you exceed 2,000 mailboxes, it's preferable to get the enterprise license.

There is an annual cost to use Microsoft Exchange, and the price could be less expensive.

I don’t have any information about how much the licensing is.

The solution could be less expensive. 

We can do monthly payments if we like; however, usually, we do a yearly subscription. 

This is a company product. I'm not in charge of licensing. I'm not sure what it would cost. 

Our IT handles the licensing process. I don’t have visibility into pricing.

I rate Microsoft Exchange's pricing a six out of ten. 

I don't have enough information about the licensing costs of Microsoft Exchange, but I do know that you need two types of licenses to run it. You need the product key and the client access key to activate Microsoft Exchange. This means that apart from the standard Microsoft Exchange licensing fees, you have to pay additional costs.

We are currently using enterprise licenses for the solution. They are different pricing models available. There are individual, cloud-based, and enterprise licenses all with different pricing models. Typically, the larger the number of users, the lesser the price. For small to medium companies like us, we feel it is expensive. However, for a large company, where they have thousands of employees the cost is distributed. We do not receive this kind of benefit because of the small company size. They should provide more discounts for the small companies because we do not complain or create too many problems for Microsoft.

For large companies that have 10,000 employees, the problems are huge and different. They use a lot of Microsoft support. Small companies that have less than 300 people should get a discount, we do not qualify for their volume discount that starts at 500 people. They should not put these kinds of restrictions on giving discounts. I expect Microsoft to come up with some different options for small to mid companies in the future.

There are different pricing tiers, and I don't remember all the costs for that. For Office 365, it depends on the license price per mailbox user. And for the on-premises version, there is a scale license. Overall, it's about average for the market. The on-premises license is a bit more costly because there is a requirement for OS-level licensing. And we offer a standard edition, so it is a little more straightforward to figure out the cost. We can also go for enterprise pricing. It depends on what the client needs.

Microsoft Exchange is an inexpensive application.

Its price is very affordable, and basically, it is the standard of the industry. We have the Exchange 365 subscription, which includes the usage of Exchange Online. I don't know the specific cost, but it is the retail price of Microsoft 365 E3 licenses.

Microsoft's licensing is not very easy to understand. Microsoft changes rules every other day, which makes it difficult for us to understand the licensing not only for Exchange but also for other products. It can sometimes be really complex to understand what you need to have in order to comply with Microsoft licensing.

Microsoft's licensing structure is too complex, but its prices are affordable, though not cheap.

I don't handle the licensing aspect of the solution. I cannot speak to any costs involved. 

This solution is expensive. On a scale of one to ten, where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate it a four. 

We have an enterprise agreement with a five-year contract.

When I was working in another company, it was Enterprise volume licensing.

There are different prices depending on the customer's use cases and amount of users. The price of the solution could improve.

I have Outlook 365 Professional, and Exchange comes in the bundle with other solutions, such as Word and OneDrive. I pay for the use of the bundle monthly and I can imagine if you are a company with many licenses the pricing model would be a lot different.

We renew the product license with Microsoft every three years.  The cost is included within a bundle of services. It's an enterprise agreement with Microsoft.

I pay about $100 for a license, but I'm a single owner.

The price of Microsoft Exchange could improve. In Egypt, the price keeps increasing.

Users have to pay a yearly licensing cost for Microsoft Exchange. I rate Microsoft Exchange a four out of ten for pricing because it is quite cheap, and many companies use the solution.

We pay a yearly license fee for the solution. The product is quite cheap.

If you want to run Exchange as an on-premises solution, you have to cover infrastructure costs. If cost is an issue, you can opt for Office 365 instead. But I'm fine with what we're paying because we have no problem budgeting for an Exchange server.

We have had an enterprise license agreement for three years. We are always seeking more value for our money, the price could be reduced.

Its price is fair.

Microsoft doesn't have a unit price, it's based on the quantity, and they offer great discounts.

We pay for the license annually. We could take advantage of it throughout the course of the year, although it is now online, meaning subscription-based, by which the person can receive all the bookings, save for the mailing system. 

I have no idea what the licensing costs are on the solution.

It's reasonable. It's an affordable price.

It's a little bit expensive.

Microsoft is now introducing a new pricing model which is subscription-based. Previously, it was a one-time purchase and you could use it until the product came to the end of life. Now it's subscription-based and you can use the subscription yearly. 

Customers can benefit from this new pricing model because it's expensive, and now with the subscription, they can budget for this.

Its price is okay.

With respect to pricing, this product is somewhere in the middle. Everything is included in the standard licensing fees.

They are flexible when it comes to pricing, unlike most of the other vendors I have dealt with.

Licensing fees are paid monthly.

There are multiple competitors in the market and I think the price is a little bit high but it has many benefits. 

Exchange is better for medium to large businesses because it can be quite costly for SMB, which may not need all the options the product provides. Customers may also need to buy additional client licenses depending on the options they require.

Microsoft Exchange is a very well-priced solution.

Depending on their use case, they can purchase a variety of licenses.

The price of Microsoft Exchange is reasonable.

Not put on the team managing this.

It's working very well. There is no problem, but the price is not the best.