F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Scalability
Ritesh-Bakhru
Major Account Manager at Check Point Software
The scalability of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is rated around six or seven on a scale of one to ten. The introduction of a chassis-based architecture allows for scalability by accommodating multiple blades within a chassis, providing flexibility in handling traffic. However, individual boxes have limitations, and to scale further, one might need to add switches or replace the box with a larger one.
View full review »
Mahmoud-Yassin
Head of IT Infrastructure and Security Operations at United Arab Bank
LTM is highly scalable, especially if you are moving away from hardware appliances. You can go for a VM and follow the basic steps of sizing, etc. and you can buy additional licenses if necessary.
View full review »SE
reviewer2129115
Senior Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
If there is a need to scale, there is a need to replace the hardware to allow for additional scalability.
Our department is between fifteen to twenty people as operators, but we are selling to half a million customers using the solution.
I rate the scalability of F5 BIG-IP LTM five out of ten.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
RP
reviewer1250289
Sr. Architect at a media company with 10,001+ employees
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is very scalable. We have quite a few people using it within our organization, from admins to vice presidents. Maintenance is also very minimal.
View full review »JO
reviewer1706595
Senior Network Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
It is scalable, but we didn't really need to scale. It met all the performance requirements we had. So, we had no issues where we were not able to add something.
Currently, its usage is quite low, but it's not because of the product. It's because of how our company works. In other words, how much we need to use it. It's not used a lot, and we don't plan to expand its usage.
View full review »AC
reviewer1739430
Senior Technical Consultant at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
For scaling, there has to be a lot of planning when we need to scale up F5. It is a bit complex.
We cannot easily scale up the LTM. We cannot put an additional box into the production without any downtime with the user experience. So adding the box or scaling up has to be done with proper planning.
We have an extensive network of users across Office 365, SharePoint, custom applications, Skype for Business, et cetera.
Some customers who have been using the solution for the last six years are wanting to migrate or wanting to upgrade their chassis to the newer version. It is typically if they have a station-hungry application to deploy, like Teams, where this is quite a useful product. With F5, the transition is quite smooth.
View full review »OD
Orphé DJEDJERO
Design and Conception Engineer at SFR
Although BIG-IP's solutions are scalable for most purposes, it's not always scalable for certain scenarios, in my opinion. From an API perspective, though, it is quite scalable.
RJ
Rakesh Joshi
General Manager at Seriti Resources
It is scalable. All our customers are enterprise-level.
View full review »
Saurabh-Pal
Sr. Security Specialist at a tech vendor with 11-50 employees
It is scalable. I would say it's around eight or nine out of ten. Our clients are at the enterprise level.
View full review »
Mohammed Abdul Rahman
F5 Consultant at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
In terms of scalability, there are some limitations on the architecture level in F5. For example, F5 has a limit of eight Virtual Control Planes (VCPs) per hardware configuration. It means expansion and scalability require additional hardware resources. I would rate scalability a five out of five. Only I am involved with this solution at my company.
View full review »JS
Joel Soares De Jesus
Operator at Capgemini Engineering
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is a scalable solution.
View full review »KV
reviewer1897710
Principle Architect (retired recently) at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is scalable. That's one of the reasons I always went for it. Some of the clients I have worked with have been Fortune 100 companies with thousands and thousands of servers they needed front-ended.
Some of these sites had multiple thousands of web instances that needed to be load balanced. We were also doing both local and global load balancing. We'd use a global load balancer that would point to local load balancing that would port it out within a specific data center.
These clients had millions of end users. I believe that nearly all of those organizations ended up increasing their load balancing platform environment.
Michael-Yuen
COO at International Household Retail Company Ltd
Our whole IT department is using the solution with some application teams. We have approximately 50 people using the solution in the IT department.
View full review »MI
Mohamed Intissar
Tax Department at a government with 10,001+ employees
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is a scalable product, but my company has yet to try scaling it because there's no need.
View full review »MD
reviewer1589751
Senior Network Engineer at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
In terms of how many users we have using it, for the end user, all our customers go through the F5, so they are using it in terms of service. In terms of our engineers and how many people use it, that depends. If you're deploying it or you're in operations, like I am, there are hundreds of engineers and internal users.
TH
Thomas Hejula
Senior IT Engineer at Lumeris
I haven't thought of production workloads on it yet. I don't know how the performance is going to be in terms of CPU memory, but I was told by other people because of what we're doing on it, it could be hard to scale. So, we may have to end up buying more because we will be encrypting and decrypting. We have to inspect that traffic, so that will be CPU intensive. Therefore, one instance may not be enough for us, as we may be spinning up multiples across Multi-AZs.
We will be just stacking our costs. Granted, it is virtualization, and you can only get so much out of it. However, I haven't put true production workloads through it. I have only done my testing, and I am concerned a bit about these factors and how they may drive our costs even more, because I will have to spin up more WAFs to accommodate for high CPU and memory loads.
View full review »KO
reviewer1573344
Network Engineer at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It reaches a point where scaling is no longer possible. Assume you have two boxes, and you want to expand. You can divide it into what is known as vices or virtual systems, but then you're stuck. This is where, NGINX comes in, in a better way, where you can simply scale up by adding more VMs or appliances without running into problems because you have an NGINX controller that controls everything.
The users are mostly administrators and network engineers like myself. The number of end users is somewhere between 2,000 and 3,000.
View full review »EF
Eric Foote
Managing Director at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
It's very scalable. Probably the largest implementation I did was with hundreds of servers behind it.
View full review »
Saneesh Pv
Network Security Specialist at GBM
I handle almost a hundred-plus customers who are using this solution. The solution comes in different form factors. The high-end models are scalable owing to their ability to cater to certain requirements. So, since there are different models available, the solution is scalable.
View full review »
John Bayangos
Lead Infrastructure Engineer at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees
The scalability is good. I'd rate it nine out of ten. It's easy to expand.
We have two or three users directly dealing with the solution.
View full review »
MariosChristodoulou
Chief Information Officer at F.P. eSafe Solutions LTD
The scalability is great. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so easily.
We have about 2,500 users on it currently.
We do plan to increase usage in the near future.
View full review »
Roni Wijaya
Vice President of It Operations at Artajasa Pembayaran Elektronis
It is a scalable solution. I rate its scalability an eight out of ten.
View full review »
MahesaPutra
Presales at Efficient IT Systems Ltd
The scalability is good. I would rate it a ten out of ten. There are over 50 users in our organization using the solution. Mostly the manager and the person in charge use this solution, but we usually work with the security and network teams as well.
View full review »MahesaPutra
Presales at Efficient IT Systems Ltd
The solution's scalability is good. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten. Around 50-100 of our customers use the solution.
View full review »
AhmedYoussef1
Network Security Consultant at Westcon-Comstor
I have clients that have approximately 5,000 users using the solutions and others with 40,000 users.
When we increase the services we have to then increase the usage of the solution, we put more virtual F5 devices in the cloud.
View full review »KL
Kok KeongLow
Head of Presales at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
BIG-IP LTM is scalable - once F5 is installed, you can keep adding servers behind it.
View full review »
UmeshKumar2
Senior System Administrator at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
LTM is scalable.
View full review »
UzochikwaEnunwa
Enterprise architect at Kyndryl
It is very scalable. We have thousands of users.
View full review »
Nirav_Shah
Technical Solutions Architect at MindTree
From a scalability point of view, this solution is not really up to the mark. The on-demand requirements or on-demand scalability options are not good.
We have close to 5,000 applications hosted on F5 that are delivered.
BE
Bachir Elsitt
Network Security Engineer at Data Consult
They have one box and you can implement many features with it like LTM, ASM, GTM. So it is scalable. And they have a virtual edition and an appliance edition.
View full review »YA
Yudi Aritonang
Co-Founder and CEO at PT Eugenea Kreasi Utama
We have approximately 115 people in our organization who use this solution.
View full review »MA
reviewer1721355
Security Technical Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
F5 BIG-IP LTM is a scalable solution, especially when deployed as a virtual machine. You can increase resources and licenses as needed, providing flexibility for growth. However, with physical appliances, scalability may be limited by hardware and license constraints.
View full review »
Abduh Rumfot
It Security Consultant at juke
The scalability of F5 BIG-IP LTM is good.
This solution is best suited for medium to large-sized businesses in the finance and telecommunications industries.
I rate the scalability of F5 BIG-IP LTM a nine out of ten.
View full review »PM
Priyesh MP
Solution Architect at Softcell Technologies Limited
It is scalable.
View full review »SA
Satish Agarwal
Lead Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
It's definitely scalable. It's a distributed architecture and micro services, so it's scalable. In fact, we are planning to increase usage and scale horizontally.
View full review »AR
reviewer1552263
Sr. SAP Portfolio Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
It is scalable. We have around 2,000 plus users.
View full review »RS
Robert Smith
DevOps Manager at TaxACT
We run an Active-Active version of two instances, so scalability between the on-premise and AWS versions hasn't been a huge issue for us. Where we are finding the AWS version helpful is when we are trying to scale up new environments. AWS Marketplace helps here a lot.
View full review »
it_user109836
Team Leader Mainframe & Webservices at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
I have not yet encountered any scalability issues.
View full review »WM
Walid Mouamar
Network and Security Engineer at a logistics company with 1,001-5,000 employees
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager is scalable.
View full review »LM
reviewer1505658
Sr. Network Engineer at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is very scalable. We have recently expanded the cluster to five nodes and I am running in an active scenario. I did the upgrade live and it did not require any downtime.
View full review »MS
reviewer1433067
Director of Network Strategies and Technologies at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
While we never really got around to scaling the solution just yet, there is horizontal scalability that is on offer that seems very good.
This is being deployed in a service provider environment. Therefore, it'll be impactful to all of our customers. However, I would say as far as internal support users, we have a team of probably ten that'll be supporting this product once it's launched in production.
GJ
Guojun Jin
Staff Engineer at UbiNavi
No issues.
View full review »SP
SagarPatel
Senior ICT Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is scalable and secure, so we propose this solution to customers with bigger environments, e.g. those in the government.
View full review »
Rajnish Niraj
Founder at Fencesense
50 percent of my customers are using this solution.
F5 BIG-IP LTM is a scalable solution.
View full review »ST
reviewer1633455
Director at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
It is not scalable. It is a licensed product. They are coming up with some scalable options, but for existing products, throughput is limited. Currently, if you have a 200 Mbps license, then it can go to a maximum of 200 Mbps. If you want it to go further than that, then you have to buy a new license.
it_user858369
Assistant Vice President at Nagarro
It is very scalable.
View full review »
Kodanda Ramji C.S
Manager | Engineering | Cloud Managed Services at Sify Technologies
The tool is scalable. It meets the requirements.
View full review »
MufeedSiaj
Network Security Presales Engineer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
I believe BIG-IP LTM is scalable, but you have to pay for extra expansions.
View full review »
Hilman Gunawan
System Engineer at PT Nusantara Compnet Integrator
Scalability is good. We use it for active and passive, and we also do some TCMP.
View full review »
AhmedIsmael
Network & Telecom Manager at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
It is not scalable. We have about 2,000 users in our organization.
View full review »it_user521841
Head of Data Centers Operations at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees
It is scalable and should meet our future requirements.
View full review »EZ
Network8776
Network Presales Manager at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
F5 BIG-IP has good scalability. We have a team managing the product. The team consists of three specialists, but they do not manage that many customers, they manage customers.
FM
Flight9875
Works at a logistics company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Scalability is similar to Citrix NetScaler where you can pay as you grow. It doesn't have the feature which you can just turn on. You have to buy into it, then you have to wait for the license, and then you have to wait to have somebody to pay for it. You can't deploy quickly.
View full review »JW
ChiefSecd99d
Chief Security Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
It seems very scalable now. We have 200 users, going to about 10,000 within the next year. There are multiple VPCs and multiple AWS accounts.
View full review »GS
Georges Samaha
Security Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
We only encountered issues with small appliances, 2000s, when we needed to add more than two modules...
View full review »it_user223881
Network Analyst at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
No issues with scalability have been encountered. I would say that this has largely been due to having a good F5 consultant and consultancy throughout the buying process and implementation. This has ensured that the product being purchased can scale past our current needs and fulfill potential future needs.
View full review »MahesaPutra
Presales at Efficient IT Systems Ltd
The solution is scalable.
View full review »MO
reviewer1788060
Senior Network and Security Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
BIG-IP can scale horizontally or vertically because it's a blade system. If you need more hardware on the same appliance, you can put blades on it. They are a bit expensive but work fine. You can create a cluster if you want to scale horizontally and put any hardware you need on it. You can scale as much as you want.
Md. Robiul Awoul
Deputy manager at Oculin Tech
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) is a scalable solution.
We have approximately nine people using this solution in my organization.
View full review »SM
reviewer1277325
Specialist in Communication and Network Security at a security firm with 11-50 employees
They have a host where you can increase the CPUs dedicated for load balancing. You can mount a cluster to escalate, but in order to escalate, you need to virtualize the solution. Otherwise, you need to change the device and load something bigger.
View full review »UP
reviewer1448481
Network Security Specialist at a energy/utilities company with 5,001-10,000 employees
In regards to scalability, I have never experienced any bottlenecks of the hardware or the features of F5. F5 doesn't have any latencies.
With Citrix, at times we experience some latencies when the web application requires more complex directions, inspections, and more complex load balancing features.
The number of users is variant. Currently, we have more than 10,000 users.
View full review »PK
Solutiond87c
Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
We run 14 servers. We get up to about half a million transactions an hour, and the scalability has been good. It has not been a problem.
View full review »it_user521838
Solution Architect/Application Administrator at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It is a scalable solution. I think it will meet our future requirements. We started using it when Cisco announced that they were no longer doing their content switch and we've been implementing it a lot. It's one of the current focuses that our company is doing in the infrastructure side of things.
View full review »LF
ipmplspr538920
Security Governance at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Not so far.
View full review »RM
Rana Mohamed
Product Manager at MCS
It is really awesome. You can scale from one or two servers to hundreds of servers. They have all the modules that a customer needs. You can go for on-premise or cloud deployment. You can have whatever you need.
Our clients are medium and large businesses.
View full review »PK
PradeepKumar11
IT Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It's a scalable solution and we have not had any limitations. We have approximately 3,000 users.
View full review »it_user1356177
IT Security Engineer at a cloud provider with 11-50 employees
This solution scales with ease. You can add equipment, reduce equipment, add configs, it is very flexible.
MK
reviewer1465533
Channel Development Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The product is scalable, we have around 200 users in our company. In terms of our customers, there would probably be over 1,000 users. We have a huge company, but our department for network security products consists of about 25 people. In half of them, users are the technical specialists.
TA
Thameem Ansari
Senior solution architect at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
This is a scalable solution.
View full review »JC
Joshua Cruz
Associate Systems Engineer at Frontline Education
We have over 12 applications that we use it for with about 300 servers which are connected up using this load balancer.
We're a big company. We do like the on-premise version. However, we are looking into AWS servers to help us scale for larger avenues as well.
View full review »Mahmoud-Yassin
Head of IT Infrastructure and Security Operations at United Arab Bank
This solution is scalable.
View full review »CS
reviewer1352181
Associate CSA at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It is scalable, especially in the cloud. On-prem, it may need additional licensing or an additional appliance. That depends on how large and what the use case is specifically for the customer.
View full review »JU
Jonathan Urrea
Security Professional Services at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
Whether you can scale easily or not depends on the device and the sizing. For example, if you have an E 2000 or I 4000, you might have a lot of traffic and the device cannot handle it very well. Scalability with the performance was the one issue that affected us this year.
Most of the customers that we have are enterprises. They are banking and insurance customers. They're quite large, which is why we need the scalability that we do.
GV
Girish Vyas
Architect - Cloud Serviced at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
I have not encountered any scalability issues.
View full review »it_user147228
Senior Security Specialist with 1,001-5,000 employees
None. Appliance based options (physical and virtual), blended with Viprion/vCMP mean that these solutions have been able to scale to support enterprise class ADC offerings.
View full review »
KN
reviewer1483797
Service Delivery Engineer - Network Security Lead at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
It is very scalable.
View full review »NH
reviewer1480176
CTO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
From our perspective, it is scalable.
View full review »RG
technica696483
Technical Product Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
It has that scalability for adding more F5, N + 1.
It's scalable, and it has more functions than a service. At the same time, this device can run access policy manager, it has Web application firewall, datacenter switching to DR sites. It has a modular approach actually. It gives you what you want.
View full review »it_user591900
IT Manager at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
We haven't bumped into scalability issues. The limitation is actually through licensing. Throughput is limited by licensing. We had an error with the license and we reached the limit but we fixed that. But there has never been trouble with the capacity or scalability.
View full review »it_user850398
Network Engineer with 1,001-5,000 employees
No issues with scalability.
View full review »SR
Sanja Rakic
Security Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Most of our clients are medium-sized entities.
For the one customer I typically deal with, there has been no need to scale or expand services. The product can be scaled by adding more licenses if necessary. That said, our clients have everything they need and have not actually done this.
There are also add-ons that come from the ASM if a company is interested in that.
SP
SaurabhPal
Technical Specialist - Network & Security at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
The product can scale quite well. We haven't had any issues. If a company needs to expand it out, they should be able to do so without trouble.
Right now, I'm the only one at the office who uses the product.
View full review »it_user526731
Sr. Network Engineer at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees
SG
Reviewer702843
Director Technology Solutions with 11-50 employees
When you enable the web application firewall on the same platform, it requires more resources. If the use case is only for load balancing, but the customers using both load balancing as well as web application firewall, the sizing has to be done correctly.
View full review »YU
reviewer1010148
Security Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The scalability of the solution is good.
We have approximately 20 engineers using the solution.
The solution is extensively being used and we plan to increase usage.
View full review »SS
Sathiya Shunmugasundaram
Site Reliability Engineer at Apple
Scalability has been great. We have thousands of severs. F5 has scaled very well.
View full review »DK
reviewer1441791
Head Of Technology at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
This is a scalable product. There are three people who manage it, but it's applicable to the entire organization, so there are approximately 1,500 users.
View full review »JC
Director1e9d
Director Public Sector at Smart Tronix Inc
The scalability is awesome. Our environment is thousands upon thousands of instances in AWS.
View full review »it_user717243
Network Security Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
it_user848262
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Solution Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
They have the potential to scale in better way.
View full review »it_user799992
Senior Network Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
I haven't done any upgrades yet, but it is scalable to some extent.
View full review »AF
Technicab017
Technical Team Leader at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
It's easier to scale.
View full review »Hilman Gunawan
System Engineer at PT Nusantara Compnet Integrator
The scalability of the solution depends on the sizing of the network. Generally, the scalability is quite good.
View full review »SB
reviewer1418577
Senior IT Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
My impression is that it's scalable.
View full review »SN
Develope0fe0
Developer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
It seems to be a very scalable product.
As for the size of our environment, we have our own data center, but it's a small data center.
View full review »NA
Hu231Anly367
Thermicien with 51-200 employees
Scalability seems fine.
View full review »it_user617790
Games, Apps and Web Developer at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Not to date.
View full review »it_user860436
Ingeniero at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
We don't need additional features to grow out the platform.
View full review »it_user750990
Network Security Administrator at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
No issues with scalability.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: April 2024
Product Categories
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)Popular Comparisons
Cisco Umbrella
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks
Microsoft Azure Application Gateway
OpenVPN Access Server
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange
Fortinet FortiWeb
F5 Advanced WAF
Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client
Check Point Remote Access VPN
Buyer's Guide
Download our free F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More:
- Primary Use Case
- Benefits
- Valuable Features
- Room for Improvement
- Use of Solution
- Deployment
- Stability
- Scalability
- Customer Service and Support
- Previous Solutions
- Initial Setup
- Implementation Team
- ROI
- Pricing
- Other Solutions Considered
- Other Advice
- Deployment Model
- F5 vs. Imperva WAF?
- F5 BIG-IP vs. Radware Alteon Comparison
- What is the performance parameter of Imperva X10K versus BIG-IP i2600?
- What are your daily F5 BIG-IP LTM use cases?
- What are the pros and cons of F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Microsoft Azure Application Gateway for a large construction company?
- When evaluating Application Delivery Controllers, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Comparison Between Kemp LoadMaster and Load Balancer.org
- Is Citrix ADC (formerly Netscaler) the best ADC to use and if not why?
- What are your daily F5 BIG-IP LTM use cases?
- Why do I need an ADC solution?
