FICO does not provide any functionality for scalability. This means we have to scale horizontally or vertically on our own. FICO Blaze as a product doesn't include any features that would allow it to be scaled up. This means that if we need to create some provisional services and install them from scratch all the time, we'll need to find another solution.

I give the scalability a zero out of ten.

Scalability-wise, they don't have any deployment server so you will have to deploy it on an individual server. So, scale-wise, it depends on the infrastructure you are using for the deployment and the third party. If you are using something in the cloud, for example, it would have its own features to scale up. They really don't provide any of those features. Those are manual things.

Our clients are medium to large businesses. There are many clients and I guess we have a big practice where almost 30 + people are using it.

We are service providers. As long as we get the new plans, we definitely try to scale it up.

Scalability is easy; you create the piece of logic for a country and a process, and scale as needed.

The scalability of FICO Blaze Advisor is good. We were trying to maintain and add a few other features. With all the users we have across locations, it was stable.

FICo supply covers the only universal engine, which can be implemented in different ways. You can build your own solution and you can make it a service that will be scalable. We have it for some countries, but it really depends on the required performance. It is easy to scale from the production system point of view. If we are talking about IDE and the development tools in general, there is no possibility to scale it.

We have hundreds of developers who are using IDE. There are additional users who are analysts and using simplified WEB IDE - RMA.

Blaze Advisor is scalable.

It is scalable as well. Our clients are enterprise companies.