Fidelis Elevate Overview

Fidelis Elevate is the #4 ranked solution in our list of XDR Security products. It is most often compared to Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks: Fidelis Elevate vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

What is Fidelis Elevate?

Fidelis Elevate integrates network visibility, data loss prevention, deception, and endpoint detection and response into one unified solution. Now your security team can focus on the most urgent threats and protect sensitive data rather than spending time validating and triaging thousands of alerts.

Fidelis Elevate is also known as Fidelis Elevate Platform, Fidelis Enterprise, Fidelis Cloud.

Buyer's Guide

Download the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: June 2021

Fidelis Elevate Customers

First Midwest Bank

Fidelis Elevate Video

Filter Archived Reviews (More than two years old)

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Filter Unavailable
Filter Unavailable
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
IT Security Coordinator at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
IPS security, originally from the GOVT space, now commerical

What is our primary use case?

It is used as our primary in-line IDS/IPS system, replacing FireEye NX. It catches more, looks at more ports than Fireeye NX, and is a scalable appliance, unlike our NX which was saturated and shut itself down.

Pros and Cons

  • "It has also improved our hunt ability with quick search tools, to zone in on malware or other anomalies. It is able to link items to incidents from other consoles, and works natively with the SIEM."
  • "It has a rating system now so you can rate things up or down, depending on your environment. This means alerting can be customized, yet still pick up anomalies."
  • "Reporting is great, it is easy to do a quick search through 45 days of data for something of interest."
  • "After rack and stack, devices were up and running base configurations within two hours. As with any IPS, tuning is required to stop false positives. This is no different, but the ease of use of the interface allowed my team to start making adjustments within a few hours."
  • "The interface bug needs to be squashed once and for all. This has been the predominant issue with an otherwise stellar product. It reboots itself unscheduled, about once a month, due to a memory buffer flaw in the interface."

What other advice do I have?

The product itself works fine, support is pretty good.