Trellix Collaboration Security Room for Improvement
In the next release, I'd like to see them provide more integration features.
View full review »The solution must provide features to scan QR codes for threats. Nowadays, threats are embedded inside QR codes.
View full review »DS
Daniel Son
System Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
I do some configurations on the backend. The cloud product is not open to the customers. If the system itself could be more open to the customer, I'd be able to configure it more specifically. The custom tailoring is limited.
Not only for the FireEye product, but whether it's Forcepoint, or Cisco, etc., language support for the Korean language is needed, for console pages or everything to be translated. Everything is in English and Korean customers face a hardship with it.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Email Security
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix, Cisco, Microsoft and others in Email Security. Updated: March 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
BP
Ben Payne
Senior Infrastructure Engineer at Compare The Market
FireEye needs single sign-on. They say it's on their roadmap. They should also implement support for Microsoft Authenticator app for 2FA.
View full review »The spam detection feature could be better. As users, we don't have any control. It detects and blocks spam based on spam engine conditions. But many emails that shouldn't be blocked are getting blocked this way, and we have to raise a ticket for the False Negative cases and it takes time to get resolved.
Every time we raise ticket, support requests received original email sample all the time to resolve the cases which is not possible to provide all the time.
View full review »SS
reviewer1074132
Information Security Analyst at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees
The customization could be stronger. It's not that easy to adjust items.
The solution needs better support.
Adding new items or features to their product should be faster. They plan to add items, however, it will take sometimes years or months to implement them into their product. For example, SAML integration. I've been hearing about it for more than three years and I haven't seen it yet done.
The licensing is pricey.
View full review »ED
EnriqueDiaz Jolly
Owner at Jolly Security Inc
If they want to be as primary or best solution, they need to have better email management features. SMTP handling is sometimes poor because you do not have a lot of options for routing. For example, if you are using IronPort and FireEye, and you want to do some complex routing and features, IronPort will beat FireEye with no effort.
The email gateway environment does its work as long as it is not too complex or sophisticated you will notice some decrease in performance.
View full review »SB
reviewer1581882
Sr Manager - Information Security & Researcher at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would like the solution to be able to automatically quarantine the malicious emails before getting to the user's mailbox and continue with regular email operations. This could result in the user clicking the email before the purge operation is completed.
As an additional feature, I hope for more interactive emails.
View full review »I would like to see this solution become more flexible.
View full review »UA
Umit Akarsu
Presales Engineer at E-DATA TEKNOLOJİ
The reporting aspect of the solution needs improvement.
The solution needs to offer antivirus and antispam features onto the on-premises deployment model.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Email Security
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Trellix, Cisco, Microsoft and others in Email Security. Updated: March 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.