FireEye Network Security Pros and Cons

FireEye Network Security Pros

CEO8280
CEO at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
The scalability has not been a problem. We have deployed the product in very high bandwidth networks. We have never had a problem with the FireEye product causing latency issues within our networks.
View full review »
Antonio El Khoury
Technical Team Leader at IRIS
Application categorization is the most valuable feature for us. Application filtering is very interesting because other products don't give you full application filtering capabilities.
View full review »
SenITCOn45
IT Senior Consultant at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
If we are receiving spam emails, or other types of malicious email coming from a particular email ID, then we are able to block them using this solution.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about FireEye, Palo Alto Networks, Broadcom and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: July 2020.
426,947 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SaladinEffendi
Head of IT Division at PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.
The product has helped improve our organization by being easy to use and integrate. This saves time, trouble and money.
View full review »
Yaser Aljohani
OT/ICS Information Security Specialist at SANS
The most valuable feature is MVX, which tests all of the files that have been received in an email.
View full review »
DepAssist9876
Deputy Assistant Secretary with 201-500 employees
We see ROI in the sense that we don't have to react because it stops anything from hurting the network. We can stop it before we have a bigger mess to clean up.
View full review »
Harneet Kaur
Information Security Consultant at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Initially, we didn't have much visibility around what is occurring at our applications lower level. For instance, if we are exposed to any malicious attacks or SQL injections. But now we've integrated FireEye with Splunk, so now we get lots of triggers based on policy content associated with FireEye. The solution has allowed for growth and improvement in our information security and security operations teams.
View full review »
Security4668
Security Analyst at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
It allows us to be more hands off in checking on emails and networking traffic. We can set up a bunch of different alerts and have it alert us.
View full review »
Sysengine0946
System Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Its ability to find zero-day threats, malware and anything malicious has greatly improved my customer's organization, especially for protecting the users' browser.
View full review »
Ala Khalil
PreSales Director at a tech services company
The features that I find most valuable are the MIR (Mandiant Incident Response) for checks on our inbound security.
View full review »

FireEye Network Security Cons

CEO8280
CEO at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
The initial setup was complex because of the nature of our environment. When it comes to the type of applications and functions which we were looking at in terms of identifying malicious threats, there would be some level of complexity, if we were doing it right.
View full review »
Antonio El Khoury
Technical Team Leader at IRIS
Based on what we deployed, they should emphasize the application filtering and the web center. We need to look deeper into the SSM inspection. If we get the full solution with that module, we don't need to get the SSM database from another supplier.
View full review »
SenITCOn45
IT Senior Consultant at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It would be a good idea if we could get an option to block based upon the content of an email, or the content of a file attachment.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about FireEye, Palo Alto Networks, Broadcom and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: July 2020.
426,947 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SaladinEffendi
Head of IT Division at PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.
As far as future inclusions, it would be useful to display more threat intelligence, such as the actual area of the threat and the origin of the web crawling (Tor and Dark Web).
View full review »
Yaser Aljohani
OT/ICS Information Security Specialist at SANS
It would be very helpful if there were better integration with other solutions from other vendors, such as Fortinet and Palo Alto.
View full review »
DepAssist9876
Deputy Assistant Secretary with 201-500 employees
Cybersecurity posture has room for improvement.
View full review »
Harneet Kaur
Information Security Consultant at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Improvements could be achieved through greater integration capabilities with different firewall solutions. Integrating with the dashboard itself for different firewalls so users can also pull tags into their firewall dashboard.
View full review »
Security4668
Security Analyst at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
I would love to see better reporting. Because you can't export some of the reports in proper formats, it is hard to extract the data from reports.
View full review »
Sysengine0946
System Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The problem with FireEye is that they don't allow VM or sandbox customization. The user doesn't have control of the VMs that are inside the box. It comes from the vendor as-is. Some users like to have control of it. Like what type of Windows and what type of applications and they have zero control over this.
View full review »
Ala Khalil
PreSales Director at a tech services company
The world is currently shifting to AI, but FIreEye is not following suit.
View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about FireEye, Palo Alto Networks, Broadcom and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: July 2020.
426,947 professionals have used our research since 2012.