Trellix Network Detection and Response Logo

Trellix Network Detection and Response pros and cons

Vendor: Trellix
4.3 out of 5
2,658 followers
Post review
 

Trellix Network Detection and Response Pros review quotes

JG
Mar 11, 2019
The scalability has not been a problem. We have deployed the product in very high bandwidth networks. We have never had a problem with the FireEye product causing latency issues within our networks.
CS
May 18, 2021
It protects from signature-based attacks and signature-less attacks. The sandboxing technology, invented by FireEye, is very valuable. Our customers go for FireEye because of the sandboxing feature. When there is a threat or any malicious activity with a signature, it can be blocked by IPS. However, attacks that do not have any signatures and are very new can only be blocked by using the sandboxing feature, which is available only in FireEye. So, FireEye has both engines. It has an IPS engine and a sandbox engine, which is the best part. You can get complete network protection by using FireEye.
AmgadYousry - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 23, 2022
The solution can scale.
Learn what your peers think about Trellix Network Detection and Response. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AE
Feb 21, 2019
Application categorization is the most valuable feature for us. Application filtering is very interesting because other products don't give you full application filtering capabilities.
SK
Dec 24, 2020
It is stable and quite protective. It has a lot of features to scan a lot of malicious things and vulnerabilities.
SH
Jun 4, 2019
If we are receiving spam emails, or other types of malicious email coming from a particular email ID, then we are able to block them using this solution.
it_user886083 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 27, 2019
The product has helped improve our organization by being easy to use and integrate. This saves time, trouble and money.
HE
Feb 16, 2022
The sandbox feature of FireEye Network Security is very good. The operating system itself has many features and it supports our design.
YA
May 18, 2020
The most valuable feature is MVX, which tests all of the files that have been received in an email.
PP
Oct 11, 2020
The server appliance is good.
 

Trellix Network Detection and Response Cons review quotes

JG
Mar 11, 2019
The initial setup was complex because of the nature of our environment. When it comes to the type of applications and functions which we were looking at in terms of identifying malicious threats, there would be some level of complexity, if we were doing it right.
CS
May 18, 2021
Its documentation can be improved. The main problem that I see with FireEye is the documentation. We are an official distributor and partner of FireEye, and we have access to complete documentation about how to configure or implement this technology, but for customers, very limited documentation is available openly. This is the area in which FireEye should evolve. All documents should be easily available for everyone.
AmgadYousry - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 23, 2022
It is an expensive solution.
Learn what your peers think about Trellix Network Detection and Response. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AE
Feb 21, 2019
Based on what we deployed, they should emphasize the application filtering and the web center. We need to look deeper into the SSM inspection. If we get the full solution with that module, we don't need to get the SSM database from another supplier.
SK
Dec 24, 2020
I heard that FireEye recently was hacked, and a lot of things were revealed. We would like FireEye to be more secure as an organization. FireEye has to be more protective because it is one of the most critical devices that we are using in our environment. They have a concept called SSL decryption, but that is only the packet address. We would like FireEye to also do a lot of decryption inside the packet. Currently, FireEye only does encryption and decryption of the header, but we would like them to do encryption and decryption of the entire packet.
SH
Jun 4, 2019
It would be a good idea if we could get an option to block based upon the content of an email, or the content of a file attachment.
it_user886083 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 27, 2019
As far as future inclusions, it would be useful to display more threat intelligence, such as the actual area of the threat and the origin of the web crawling (Tor and Dark Web).
HE
Feb 16, 2022
FireEye Network Security should have better integration with other vendors' firewalls or proxies, such as Palo Alto and Fortinet. Files that are being submitted should happen through the API or automatically.
YA
May 18, 2020
It would be very helpful if there were better integration with other solutions from other vendors, such as Fortinet and Palo Alto.
PP
Oct 11, 2020
Technical packaging could be improved.