Forcepoint Web Security Room for Improvement

Mohammed Farooq
IT Security Engineer at isit
For improvement, we cannot deploy the Forcepoint Web Security firewall directly without ISP. The firewall doesn't have any features because some customers are requesting they will install the firewall without licensing. At this time we cannot go further without licensing. Licensing is a must with Forcepoint Web Security firewalls. I'm not sure that those features are included with Forcepoint Web Security. We checked the other features but we have not checked out their performance. View full review »
AmgadYousry
Security Team Leader at Infort
If the solution had a lower cost, it would be easier to implement. In the 8.5 version of the solution, I took some issue with the interface. I'd recommend that the company supports more process to matrix files. We've had issues with that. The solution should be better able to support itself and operate faster. Sometimes the technical support team takes too long to respond. View full review »
SeniorSy8b29
Senior Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
There were several issues with the product. * Version 8.4 can only be managed with a CLI, they removed the nice GUI interface from version 8.1. * The load-balancing needs massive improvements. * The incident lists don’t sync between appliances, they need to be manually edited for each one. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Forcepoint, Symantec, Zscaler and others in Web Security Gateways. Updated: December 2019.
391,932 professionals have used our research since 2012.
OwnChair354
Owner at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Ease of use could be improved. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Forcepoint, Symantec, Zscaler and others in Web Security Gateways. Updated: December 2019.
391,932 professionals have used our research since 2012.