I'd like to see Forescout play well with some of our other tools to be able to link up.

In terms of its usage, from what we heard, there are around 14 bases that are using Forescout currently. For its maintenance, just one or two people are required. When you get too many hands in a cookie jar, you end up having problems. So, we got a couple of people in here who know Forescout and dig into it. We have a few people who just have read-only accounts. They go in and look up things, but they can't make any administrative changes.

The Forescout Platform is scalable.

We are using it, and we have currently rolled out this solution to 55% of our organization.

We have approximately 400,000 users.

The stability of the Forescout Platform is good.

In terms of our deployment, it's basically just buying more CounterACT appliances whenever we need to scale up. It can be done, but it's not scalable in the way that a cloud deployment is, it's somewhere in the middle.

We have a large number of users, in our organization. 

It has been implemented in a large number of federal agencies, including the Departments of Health and Human Services, Agriculture, and the Treasury. It's quite large.

I believe that the current state should be maintained. I don't believe there are any major plans to increase our usage. Maybe just upgrades or future license upgrades, or something like that.

We have security engineers and support workers using the solution.

I rate the scalability of the Forescout Platform a seven out of ten.

Forescout Platform is scalable.

Forescout Platform is scalable.

We have approximately 4,000 people using the solution in my organization.

My company has 800 to 1000 endpoints and approximately 500 users. I rate the tool's scalability an eight out of ten. Forescout Platform is fully operational in our company, managing all our devices. We plan to use it more in the future because we're setting up a zero-trust architecture. This will allow our staff to work remotely, even from home.

Forescout's scalability isn't robust or straighforward enough. You need to plan ahead and purchase the correct appliance before scaling up. You will be limited if you buy a smaller plan. 

Forescout Platform can scale very easily. You can deploy as many servers as you want, and it's highly scalable. There is console to manage all the Forescout servers which make for easy scalability. 

Forescout Platform is used by only the network and security administrators. There is a total of 10 people using it.

It is a scalable solution.

I can recommend the solution to medium and enterprise-sized companies. I recommend an open-source product over Forescout Platform to small businesses.

The scalability varies. If you have 1000 endpoints, Forescout recommends the 2000 endpoint plan. Depending on the scalability you choose, the hardware and license can be extended.

We currently have three people who use this solution, including an
IT security person, an administrator, and a technical person.

Scaling it poses no challenges or obstacles. I would rate it nine out of ten.

It is highly scalable and easy to implement.

I rate the solution an eight or nine out of ten for scalability.

The solution is highly scalable. I currently use it for corporate use within my company and for other clients. We have three to four engineers for deployment and maintenance tasks.

There are no problems with Forescout Platform's scalability.

It is very scalable. You can set up an appliance as an Enterprise Manager, which means it can manage a large number of other appliances or VMs. The Enterprise Manager can operate in HA (High Availability) mode, and can manage 100 of the 5160 appliances. Each 5160 can mange 20,000 endpoints, so Forescout can scale to around 2 million endpoints.

The Forescout Platform is easy to scale. We have more than 200,000 endpoints and at least 150,000 users.

While I haven't personally attempted to scale, it is my understanding that we are adding licenses and expanding it. Therefore, in all likelihood, it can scale. 

We have 800 users in total. All departments use it.

The solution can scale as necessary. You just pay more according to the number of users you are adding. 

We have about 70 users on the solution. 

We use it daily for our clients. 

Our issue, in terms of scalability, is that we have a brittle machine. We struggled to get the licenses loaded. We would need to change the machine in order to develop a certain level of scalability capabilities.

At the moment, we have about 100 users on the solution, however, we require more licenses. Our goal was 1000 users on devices, however, it wasn't possible. The economics were against us.

We run virtual appliances. We have needed to bring up a fully functional data center in less than 15 weeks. Forescout takes less than a day to implement. Their product is very scalable.

We're a huge company, over 100,000 employees, and it does require that we have done our homework ahead of time -- that we know where our address space is, that we know what's out there, and being able to come up with a deployment plan is our responsibility. Once we had that, we were able to go with it, and it works very well.

• It is very scalable, allowing additional strategic appliances as required in either physical or VM format.
• We control >400 field sites, two Oilsands mines, multiple remote platform locations, 2 Canadian Metro offices and 1 UK office with 4 appliances centrally located.

The solution is scalable. It is not one box that has limitations on licenses. Forescout Platform is more capable than Aruba ClearPass. 

No, this is one of the products strengths.

The solution is scalable.

The Forescout Platform is scalable.

Forescout Platform is scalable.

The product seems to be scalable although we didn't fully test it. 

It is very scalable with a lot of features that we aren't even using yet today.

The scalability of the Forescout Platformall depends on the license. For example, if you have a certain amount of users, endpoints, and anything else you need to put under governance. If you scale out to a higher number, all you need to do is increase the license.

We have five customers and a total endpoints users of approximately 15,000.

We haven't scaled it all the way up, but we started to pilot, grew it to a couple of floors, and then grew it to an entire building.

This solution is not that easy to scale but this depends on a company's needs. 

For our business, if we want to connect to the host, we can do it from one main office and can connect an inventory to those remote hosts from one point. If we want to collect spam traffic, for example, we cannot collect this traffic from one point, because a wider connection channel is needed. So in this case, we need to deploy an additional server for Forescout that will collect spam traffic and send method data to the main management server.

The solution is scalable. If an organization needs to expand it out, they are able to fairly easily.

We tend to use this solution for different sized companies in various markets.

It is a good product that is fit for purpose.

We have had no issues with scaling it for our needs.

We have three thousand end-user clients. Those are the majority of the people whom we monitor with CounterACT and not so much core devices like servers, or mainframes, or things of that nature. If we have to roll out an update to a client or some of our mobile users, it does so pretty seamlessly.

We believe this product is easily scalable.

Very good policy has been released with the for device licenses that permit to "paint" the better solution using virtual appliances.

We probably have 172,000 users in our department, so I would say that it's scalable. It's in the SOC. We'll probably need to scale it further as we expand it to our 20 other departments.

We've had no issues with scalability.

Scalability was not a problem for this site as we have less than 1000 endpoints.

Forescout Platform is a scalable solution and it is easy to scale.

Forescout Platform is new to the market here in Pakistan and customers prefer Cisco. We recommend the Forescout Platform to our customers because they are comparable solutions. Many of them are considering the Forescout Platform for their upcoming project. Customers in the financial sector have been interested in the solution.

The solution is scalable. We recommend it for all companies. It can be installed in enterprise, and we currently have it for over 4000 users.

I thinking that Forescout scales well enough.

The installation is small enough, it's 500 users and there are no issues with the performance. So our escalation costs, we are small so it's perfect. I've had no issues. The availability is one hundred percent available. So we don't have issues with that also, so very good.

There have been no issues scaling it.

The scalability is quite good. It does depend on the complexity of the setup, but for our purposes, we've never run into any issues.

We didn't have any issues with the ForeScout scalability. So far, we've agreed with the pricing required for both the hardware and the software. 

We had no issues scaling it for our needs.

ForeScout is scalable since a management device is available to manage other CT boxes.

The solution is absolutely scalable.

In terms of scalability, my deployment architecture is central, so it scales with respect to the number of devices I have to add to my network. The licensing is based on the number of devices you have currently with regards to the future growth in the number of connected devices to your IT network or to your IT infrastructure. That gives you room to scale. So if I know that in the next two years, I would have an additional 50 or 100 users connecting to my network, either directly or remotely, I go for an appliance that accommodates that growth. Which is what I currently have.

So there's room to scale. Then the licensing is based on the number of devices you have currently. So if I have more devices come to my network, I can just acquire more licenses to take care of them. So I think that's fine.

It's scalable, but not without a big investment. It doesn't do so well at the branch. At the home office, it does okay and not so well at the branch.

It's very simple to scale and to implement more devices and licenses. It's easy to grow.

Haven't had to scale it.

There have been no issues with scaling it.

There were many issues with scalability, but these were largely due to our own network architecture issues.

There have been no issues with scaling it.

No major issues.