I haven't had issues with ForgeRock's stability, but there could be some performance improvements. Initially, it took some time to maintain some features. In the directory stores, it took a lot of time. There are some lags due to different reasons, or maybe it's a network issue. We have problems connecting with the database. We need to add monitoring tools for all those parts and immediately verify which components went down.

This is a stable solution from a performance perspective.

This is a stable solution. When you do experience any issues, you will see it in your DB logs or audit logs so you can easily reach a conclusion of might be causing it.

We have found this solution to be extremely stable.

It's been only two, three months. So far, we haven't seen any issues and I'm not sure if we will have any issues in the next year or so. 

However, as we move, my biggest concern in the past and right now is when we start adding multiple clients to the same base setup. That's where I'm more worried about how it will take individual authentication versus claims level authentication. I wonder about how it's going to handle all of that. That's where I'm more worried. I'm patiently waiting for a few clients to be on the platform. 

I rate ForgeRock's stability a nine out of ten.

The solution's stability has to be better, but it depends mainly on how the solution is deployed. Everything is linked to the deployment style. If the deployment is done properly, everything can be fixed automatically.

I rate the solution a seven out of ten for stability.

This is a neutral product in terms of stability. It's generally fine but sometimes there are issues which could be connected to the application rather than the product.

It is a reliable solution.

The solution is stable.

I rate the stability of ForgeRock an eight out of ten.

It is stable.

The stability of the solution is good. They are coming up with good solutions and features. However, I think they should focus more on how they can automate things or make it simpler when it comes to the implementation of cloud solutions.

With every upgraded version, they come with some minor instability issues or little functionality errors. We did find many small and medium functionality issues from the journey of OpenAM 13.0.0 to Access Management 5.1.1, which they fixed in the next upgrades.

The stability is quite good. As an IDM system, it's not so stressed. We create five or six users per month. 

I find the solution to be stable, it has been working well. However, we have encountered some stability issues when we tried to upgrade. Normally we would have to reboot the server and occasionally have performance and tunning issues. The solution's stability during the upgrade should be improved.

I have found ForgeRock to be stable.

I have found the solution stable.

It is a customizable solution so if the customization is on track then it is stable. 

Not with the version I’m reviewing. There were issues in previous versions but they were fixed over time.

I did, but I would rather blame my LDAP infrastructure. No significant issues with the product had been encountered that are worth mentioning.

Not more then average.

No, except that new versions often have basic bugs, which should not be the case.

This solution is stable.

This solution is relatively stable.