Fortinet FortiADC Logo

Fortinet FortiADC pros and cons

Vendor: Fortinet
3.9 out of 5
143 followers
Post review
 

Fortinet FortiADC Pros review quotes

Mohammad Ab.Rahman - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 5, 2022
The GSLB, the DR side, is the best part. Because we had our main side in one city, we created another, and we had a complete MPLS over the internet. We used the GSLB and data loss for our business applications.
VK
Dec 10, 2020
Content caching and content compression are good features.
Saeid Khanipour Ghobani - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 9, 2022
The solution provides high-level services such as availability, redundancy, and load balancing between servers.
Learn what your peers think about Fortinet FortiADC. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Seshi Dumpa - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 15, 2022
Ease of use in deploying and having it up and running requires minimal knowledge.
Bruno Moreira - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 2, 2023
Although FortiADC has multiple features that I like, the global DNS is the most helpful. It is primarily useful for customers with huge environments and at least two data centers. FortiADC can act as your DNS server. It can check which data center has the lowest latency, and route traffic to that one. It's an intelligent DNS.
it_user1256058 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 9, 2020
TSL and SSL offloading are both very good features.
IJ
May 24, 2023
It's a good product because it supports all the features that ADC solutions in the market can support, like F5 solutions, for example, such as the LTM of F5.
NC
Apr 2, 2018
Because ADC is the intermediary between the servers and the end-user application, it gives thorough information about the traffic, what the problem is.
VV
Apr 8, 2018
Key features include SSL Offloading, VM availability, and L7 load balancing.
MA
Jan 30, 2024
The user interface is very easy and integrates with Sandbox easily.
 

Fortinet FortiADC Cons review quotes

Mohammad Ab.Rahman - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 5, 2022
Because it is so generic, the documentation requires special attention. A person who has not worked on Fortinet FortiADC or a similar product will struggle to understand what the document is trying to say. The documentation could be more specific, and more detailed.
VK
Dec 10, 2020
Technical support and documentation could both be improved.
Saeid Khanipour Ghobani - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 9, 2022
The solution's WAF needs an upgrade because it is not as good as FortiWeb, VMware, F5, or Imperva.
Learn what your peers think about Fortinet FortiADC. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Seshi Dumpa - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 15, 2022
There is a mismatch between the number of features they are offering and the device capacity on how much it can handle.
Bruno Moreira - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 2, 2023
I had a terrible experience with Fortinet support. I only used support once when I bought the solution. I got no response for two days. However, I believe that it's no longer the case. Fortinet solutions have problems when they're launched. For example, we had issues with Fortinet's authenticator when it came out. We also had trouble with FortiNAC in the beginning.
it_user1256058 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 9, 2020
FortiADC is complex to configure so the interface should be improved.
IJ
May 24, 2023
Fortinet has some drawbacks, and it can be a bit challenging to scale.
NC
Apr 2, 2018
The L7 Persistent load-balancing algorithm has not worked for me after having tested it many times with my customer's in-house application. I'd like to suggest that the company make sure that all load-balancing algorithms work properly with most applications, even those that are in-house apps.
VV
Apr 8, 2018
The user interface could be more friendly and CLI could be more like that of Fortigate.
MA
Jan 30, 2024
The solution’s pricing could be improved.