I rate FortiNAC 8 out of 10 for stability.

So far, from what I have seen, it is a stable solution.

I did not have any issues with the stability of this solution. I have a single instance that is pushed out across 20+ campuses and some use it more while others use it less. Once a device has been connected, set up, and programmed for, I've got little to no complaints about it. So, once it's up and running and set up correctly, I have had no issues with it.

Fortinet FortiNAC is a stable solution. 

It provides excellent stability capabilities. I would rate it eight out of ten.

I rate the stability of Fortinet FortiNAC an eight out of ten.

I would rate the stability of Fortinet FortiNAC seven out of ten.

The solution is not stable. We've had some issues with the performance. It hasn't gone well. 

Initially, during the first week or two, it was a bit unstable, but they were resolved.

I rate Fortinet FortiNAC an eight out of ten for stability because I had issues with its previous versions.

I rate the tool’s stability a nine out of ten. The product was a bit unstable for the first few days, but it stabilized eventually.

The stability of this product is very good. With FortiNAC you have protection for each of your services.

The latest version of the solution is stable.

I would rate Fortinet FortiNAC's stability a ten out of ten. 

After version nine, the solution has been stable. There were some issues with stability in the previous versions.

The solution is stable. 

It is a stable platform. I rate its stability a ten out of ten.

It's not a stable solution. If you want to do the HA, suddenly both appliances will be gone. Both FortiNAC and Forescout are being built on CentOS Linux. Doing HA with FortiNAC, which should be very simple, is just a disaster. I know three customers who are complaining.

We have experienced stability issues, particularly with the latest firmware versions. The extended development cycle for these updates makes us hesitant to adopt new products immediately upon their release.

I would rate the stability of Fortinet FortiNAC a seven out of ten.

Fortinet FortiNAC is stable.

The solution is stable.

FortiNAC is Pretty stable. We initially had a couple of troubleshooting issues in the deployments but we worked them out and it's fine now and has pretty good Visibility across the Network for every device, application and user, extend Control of the Network to third-party products and automated responsiveness.

You won't find so many NAC solutions like it. I mean it's granular, you will see a lot that you need to ask. It will give you all the controls you need and it has event alarm mapping, - I mean "you can't control what you can't see"

I'll have a better idea next week about the stability, once it's been tested in the production environment.

Its stability and scalability are slightly lower than Aruba. I have a personal preference for Aruba ClearPass, so I would rate FortiNAC a seven out of 10 in these aspects.

The solution is stable.

Fortinet FortiNAC has been good.

We had no issues with the stability.

FortiNAC's performance is excellent.

The stability is relatively poor, as it has taken us roughly 12 months to get the network access control to be functional. It took us six months to get the USB lockdown to work appropriately. It still false flags mice, etc. On top of it, it broke once we finally got the network access control working. It literally took us 12 months for people to be blocked on an Ethernet connection, and it takes about 90 seconds to knock them off. Even then, it's only 50/50. We have escalated this every week for 12 months, and I'm not sure we'll be renewing this contract.

FortiNAC is quite a stable solution. 

FortiNAC is a stable solution.

Fortinet FortiNAC is a stable solution.

Issues with polling switches, hosts not being updated with accurate host names affected its stability.

The solution is stable.

FortiNAC is a stable solution.

FortiNAC is a stable product.