Fortinet FortiExtender Room for Improvement

MohamedTalbi
Network and Security Engineer at VERMEG for Banking & Insurance Software
The engineering of the solution has some negative points, especially in terms of troubleshooting. It's difficult to troubleshoot when we have a problem. It's not like other products like Cisco or Palo Alto which make troubleshooting much easier. The solution should offer better monitoring, like Palo Alto, which uses the monitoring feature to help you find a problem. Palo Alto also offers a packet tracer to give you the opportunity to test your configuration before you use it. That way, you can try a configuration you are not sure about it. Fortinet, in my opinion, can do more at this point. View full review »
reviewer1024680
Co-founder and Chief Operating Officer at a tech company with 11-50 employees
The solution would be a lot better if it was a little bit more intuitive. Additionally, the help menu would be a lot better if it was easier to identify the items that I was looking for. I find the graphical interface a little bit difficult to navigate. And I find the font that is used on the HTML interface not conducive to being able to be read in low light situations. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Ubiquiti Networks, Cisco and others in Wireless WAN. Updated: May 2020.
418,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.