froglogic Squish Previous Solutions

DR
QA at a tech company with 11-50 employees

As I mentioned earlier, we haven't completed the full cycle yet. However, based on what I know, defining test modules for remote machines and generating reports seemed straightforward. In the direct desktop version, it was easy to set up and execute tests on remote machines, with reports automatically generated and sent via email without much configuration. However, I currently face challenges executing tests on remote machines and generating reports in the Squish GUI Tester.

View full review »
LV
Software Test Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

I used HP before froglogic Squish. I made the switch because my colleagues studied it and recommended it.

View full review »
WS
Contract Programmer at a non-profit with 51-200 employees

This is our first experience with test automation. We knew that what we were doing did not work. Squish is a rational approach to testing of software.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
froglogic Squish
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about froglogic Squish. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user367245 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Developer at Global Graphics Software

This was our first UI automation tool but we did evaluate others. We chose Squish because of its scripting ability, instead of just recording a test. Also it was the best tool for UI component identification in our product.

View full review »
it_user371367 - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate - Projects at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

We were using HP QTP, before selecting squish we did a POC on TestComplete and some other vendor tools. Cost and non availability of Support for new tool kits were the reason we moved to Squish.

View full review »
it_user369420 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Tester & SQA at a manufacturing company with 501-1,000 employees

I didn't use any other solution. Some other colleagues did an evaluation of several tools, and this was the closest to our needs.

View full review »
SW
Sr. Software Solution Engineer at Meteonic Innovation Pvt Ltd at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.

Yes, we have used multiple open source tools before Squish. The main problem with open source tools and some commercial tools are that they work based on visuals and pixels but Squish on the other hand works based on objects. So, Squish results are consistent and reusable. 

Squish test scripts can be created in multiple scripting languages, and the execution can be automated. Squish results can be exported in HTML and XML.

Squish results can be pushed directly to Jira.

View full review »
Prasad D - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior H.R - DevOps & Infrastructure Recruitment Consultant at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.

I have used some other tools, but when compared I feel Squish has very good potential.

View full review »
it_user371865 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Not really, there aren't many automation tools available for OS X.

View full review »
RA
Software Solutions Engineer at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.

Yes, we've used different tools which we didn't find much powerful as that of Squish.

View full review »
Vishwas D - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager at Meteonic Innovation Private Limited

We previously used an open source tool.

View full review »
SC
Project Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

We switched to frogLogic Squish because it supports multiple scripting languages.

View full review »
it_user371322 - PeerSpot reviewer
Expert in Test Automation at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

I have used HP QTP, Rational Robot, MS VS Coded UI Test, and Selenium.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
froglogic Squish
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about froglogic Squish. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.