Grafana has been scalable in the pipelines we have used it in. We have 10,000 web links for 10,000 Grafana dashboards.

You have to plan. You have a certain number or gigabit of logs that you can index. You also have a limited number of series. For users, I don't remember if we had any issues adding users. However, there is a cost per the size of the logs or the number of series. Scaling will drive costs up. Right now, our IT and development team is on the product. They are encouraging other departments to try it out. 

Grafana is scalable for product-based companies, but for service-based companies with multiple projects, it's difficult to scale using Grafana. However, since it provides all the features for free, it's manageable.

We are a small company of 70 people, and I am currently the only one using Grafana. We started using it after I researched and decided to use Prometheus and Grafana for monitoring.

Kubernetes is pretty much easy, but Grafana needs to do a better job in Prometheus because right now, it doesn't support traftering the Prometheus. You need to add some other parts, which are called the SOAR, and that big scale to distribute between two Prometheus. That's not easy to do. So, Grafana needs to work on that.

For configuration on Grafana, just me. For using Grafana, there are around 12 developers using Grafana in our Organization. 

We have never had any issues with scalability. 

Everyone in our organization uses this solution. So, we have over 10,000 end users. 

While using the Grafana open-source version, scalability will definitely be a big challenge because you are not using an enterprise version. Grafana's open-source version is not scalable. It's useful for small use cases and specific use cases. Using the Grafana open-source version will be challenging if you want to deploy a hundred applications and bring up a hundred dashboards for different reasons. While it is possible to do, you will end up having issues.

I'd rate the scalability nine out of ten. It can extend well. 

It is a scalable product because we used Grafana on-prem, with only one server. If we need to add more Grafana servers, it is possible.

The solution is scalable.

I give the scalability an eight out of ten.

We have five users in our organization.

I am unaware of the scalability. There were around 500 users when I worked there. The network team was using it on a large scale.

I give the scalability of the solution an eight out of ten.

Scaling Grafana is a bit complicated, so I want to create a cluster to promote high availability in the solution, deploy in one step, and for Grafana to scale automatically.

Numerous users, ranging from five hundred to a maximum of three hundred, frequently engage in upscaling and downscaling activities. The system handles this well, and the performance remains stable, even when multiple users log in and out simultaneously.

I'd rate the scalability eight out of ten. It can extend well. 

We had 50 or more people using it in my previous organization. 

We currently have over 50 people using the solution.

With our workload, it's working fine. Going by that, I'd rate it a 10 out of 10, but I don't know about the other cases.

Grafana is scalable and can be implemented in multiple environments.

Grafana is mainly for visualization, so many instances can be set as needed. Grafana can also be configured for high availability for some scenarios like alerting, authentication, and databases.

The technical personnel in my company use the tool, and it is possible to add or delete devices and other statuses in the solution. Around five people in my company use the product.

The solution is scalable, we have over 40 users. 

The product works for monitoring as well, including log monitoring, monitoring, and alerting. However, we are using just the dashboard. Therefore, I cannot give my view on whether it is scalable or not.

We have about seven admins and 20 users on the solution. 

The scalability is sufficient for our needs. 

Scalability could be improved. 

It is scalable based on different metrics, and we have 40 users.

The solution is scalable and we can add people on without any issues. Additionally, we can integrate our single internal sign-on into the solution. About 40% percent of the engineers in the company are using this solution.

It's easy to scale this solution. 

Grafana is a very scalable product. It's a really good product.

I know many people who use Grafana to monitor SuccessFactors.

It is a scalable solution, but we use it only for one instance. We have over twenty solution users, including support engineers, developers, and system administrators.

I have around 20 to 30 people using the solution in my company.

The solution is scalable. 

Around 25 to 30 people are using Grafana in our organization.

Currently no, but you will need to use MySQL DB instead of sqlite3 for your production environment.