AppPulse Suite [EOL] Scalability

it_user469512 - PeerSpot reviewer
Supervisor Infrastructure - IOC at Ameren

Haven't had any issues yet. We ramp up extremely fast. We bought a handful of extra licenses with our original deployment. We can deploy and monitor our website in hours.

View full review »
it_user482646 - PeerSpot reviewer
Application Development Specialist Lead at a energy/utilities company with 5,001-10,000 employees

To us, scalability is irrelevant as it's cloud-based. We're not hosting it, so it makes it easy for us. Performance-wise, I see no issues on performance. The way we're licensed is we buy a certain number of transactions, so if we need to scale up we just buy more transaction licenses.

View full review »
it_user671400 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT testing lead at a pharma/biotech company with 5,001-10,000 employees

In terms of scalability, we are not using it extensively. From a scalability point of view, we do not have an extensive number of applications that we are monitoring through this solution. I cannot really answer that question.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Mobile APM
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, AppDynamics, New Relic and others in Mobile APM. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user254979 - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at Gulliver Group (Digital Ventures & Investments)

No issues encountered.

View full review »
it_user476802 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Information Technology with 1,001-5,000 employees

I think compatibility is one of the reasons we choose AppPulse Mobile. It complements the other HPE tools we also use. This gave us end-to-end monitoring testing, so that's why we chose AppPulse Mobile.

View full review »
it_user253338 - PeerSpot reviewer
Co Founder and COO at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

The scalability is very robust. I especially like that the business model is based per device and not per transaction, which means less cost. That wasn't the business model for all the other companies we considered. I can control the costs.

The success is based on our long term success so we're working together: measure, focus and improve based on analytics.

View full review »
it_user361911 - PeerSpot reviewer
CTO at a tech company with 51-200 employees

Right now, we have 120,000 users and our version only reports the first 25,000 users because we are part of the HP Start-up Program in Paris and have a free trial. Should we choose, we can upgrade our solution and it would scale to as many users as we need.

View full review »
it_user487431 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mexico Operations Manager at Tsoft

It's not a problem with scalability, but the size of the services and I think the scalability is from HPE and me.

View full review »
IH
Managing Director at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

No issues at all.

View full review »
it_user251133 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

No issues with scalability.

View full review »
it_user567780 - PeerSpot reviewer
Infrastructure Team Lead at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

I've only been using it three to four months at this point, so I really can't tell right now. But the solution should be scalable.

View full review »
it_user739602 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consultant

It's not a problem. The scalability is huge.

View full review »
it_user482793 - PeerSpot reviewer
Subaddress Production Management at Banco Santander Mexico

Now, we have only one application with AppPulse.

A mobile app froze, and we have another application which we use as well. We want to integrate these other applications into AppPulse to help improve the quality of the applications and it's data.

View full review »
it_user270900 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technology Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

No issues encountered.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Mobile APM
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, AppDynamics, New Relic and others in Mobile APM. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.