It is a solution that we could expand in our company. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Our company has 400 users, all of whom have used it at one point or the other. All of the departments are involved in the usage of the tool.

Mainly, it is an enterprise-level product that I'm using. It is a scalable product. 

I have found a reasonable amount of people using it because we are an enterprise business. 

I would rate the scalability as a nine out of ten. We have five people in total using the solution at my company.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

My company's clients who use the solution are mid-sized to enterprise-sized companies.

I would rate HPE ConvergedSystem's scalability a nine out of ten. My company has roughly 60 users for the solution. 

In terms of scalability, these types of devices are very successful in expanding. This is due to the fact that you can expand simply by adding nodes and changing the size of the storage. It's easy.

We initially implemented a very small, 2-3 terabyte, 10-unit SAP HANA. Now, we’re going to scale to about 10 terabytes.

During scaling, it’s very important to know if the implementation partner has accounted for scalability during the initial process.

As we worked with HP, we found that they were very proactive about our scalability, how to construct the racks, and what kind of hardware peripherals you would need to ensure scalability.

For us, adding a unit each time is elementary as we're able to deploy it quickly. Within 15 to 20 days, we can have a new unit up on the ConvergedSystem platform, which is incredible. We need not have lengthy, time-consuming hardware implementation processes.

We believe that this is a scalable solution, although we haven't had to extend it yet. One of the reasons that we would have chosen it, however, is so that we could scale when necessary.

You can scale out by adding additional nodes, which will increase performance capacity for you. 

No issues with scalability. We are good to go on that.

Customers can scale up very easily.

It's very easy to scale this solution. Our customers are generally medium enterprise, at least medium for Mexico. They have plans to increase usage. 

This is the first implementation of it, and at this point, we don't have the need to scale. However, we do see a problem down the road because the exact model we have right now seems to be out of production. But we are remaining with the HPE team and they have said they will provide a new one and take the old one as part of the payment, so that's OK for us.

We got it about three years ago. We have a policy that we don't scale. We use a system for about five years and then we change the whole system.

Expensive, but scalable.

I can't really speak to scalability yet because we have just a small test environment now. We're looking to move it to production later on, I think, the end of this year. We haven't really had to scale it that far. We've only done a little primary testing, not a large load of servers or storage or anything like that, but it's performed very well so far. There's so little data actually on it. I can't really speak to the scalability of it. I know it scales to 128 servers. We might need to scale past that. We'll probably need several ConvergedSystems, which is, maybe, not ideal. If it could scale past 128 servers, that'd probably be beneficial. For our needs right now, we haven't hit that yet. We probably will in the future but it's too soon.

The solution is highly scalable in a modular fashion. We've never had any issues with scaling.

This is a scalable solution. Our customers begin with an initial configuration and later add more servers, memory and other options to meet the demands of increased processing.