The scalability has been very good. When you can plan ahead of time for expansion, like putting in four enclosures with half of it open, then all you need to do is say, "Send me more blades." It is so much better.

It scales up very greatly.

The storage has already been expanded twice and it has proven to be easily scalable. I would rate it eight out of ten.

The scalability of the service is amazing. The fact that the Synergy frames can scale up so quickly and so easily, compared to a c7000 is great. We don't have to buy additional Virtual Connects, we don't need to keep on buying Onboard Administrators. That really helps with the scalability. 

I love the fact that, for the Nimble array with the GreenLake service specifically, there's no additional cost for them to upgrade the head units. If we max out the capacity of our Nimble storage array, if we need 20 terabytes more, they will just come out and swap the entire array heads, giving us the ability to add space and only charging us for that space, not for swapping out the heads.

I would rate the scalability at around four out of ten. It's not good. My company has two users. 

It certainly appears to scale well beyond what we need it to do.

The scalability of HPE GreenLake is very good. My clients have been using the solution for a long time and it has been flexible.

The solution is very scalable. We have no issues with that whatsoever. We've been able to do whatever we need to do at any time.

It is a great way to scale.

It has scaled up for us worldwide. The only places where we really can't implement, or do GreenLake yet to its full extent, are in places where the in-country rules prevent us from doing that.

In terms of scalability it's tough for us. Right now, it's actually counterproductive for our scalability. I'm hoping that once we reach the upper band in our contract that it will provide us some scalability there.