HPE Helion Alternatives and Competitors

Get our free report covering Microsoft, IBM, Dell EMC, and other competitors of HPE Helion. Updated: June 2021.
512,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Read reviews of HPE Helion alternatives and competitors

MT
Principal Consultant at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Consultant
Top 10
This helps us meet multiple requirements other PaaS solutions do not but there is a lot of room for improvement

What is our primary use case?

I work with our enterprise architecture. In my network, there are almost 400 total applications. I have been working here for almost six months on a network migration and in those six months, I have been working with many of those applications that have been included with the involvement of Azure in the migration. We are migrating everything from the old network to a new architecture. There are multiple teams that I work with and people work with me throughout the organization. I review all the target architectures and the deployment and everything that comes along with the pieces of the… more »

Pros and Cons

  • "It is a flexible solution that is straightforward to use."
  • "Stability can suffer in the context of a large architecture."

What other advice do I have?

I would definitely recommend Azure as a solution because it is a popular product by a major brand and it is very easy to use. I think those people I would recommend it to should normally be those who understand the cloud and the advantages and disadvantages. I use it for a lot of things and I do not see any problems. I love it now as a solution so I would recommend it. But if I have a different experience with another very large migration project using a different product, I would have to compare Azure with that. I may get more comfortable with the other product for reasons I have not…
Get our free report covering Microsoft, IBM, Dell EMC, and other competitors of HPE Helion. Updated: June 2021.
512,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.