We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

HPE Intelligent Management Center OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

HPE Intelligent Management Center is #13 ranked solution in top Network Management Applications. IT Central Station users give HPE Intelligent Management Center an average rating of 8 out of 10. HPE Intelligent Management Center is most commonly compared to Cisco Prime: HPE Intelligent Management Center vs Cisco Prime. The top industry researching this solution is Comms Service Provider, accounting for 26% of all views.
What is HPE Intelligent Management Center?

HPE Intelligent Management Center (IMC) is a comprehensive management platform that was built from the ground up to support the Fault, Configuration, Accounting, Performance, Security (FCAPS) model. It provides features and functions that are designed for comprehensive management of the network infrastructure. IMC was designed to provide the following functions:

  • Supports the ITIL operational center of excellence IT practices model.
  • Uses a single-pane management paradigm to enable end-to-end business management of IT services
  • Provides scalability by supporting distributed and hierarchical system architectures, through additional operating system and database support.
  • Uses an SOA model to provide full resource, service, and user management.
  • Enables integration of traditionally separate management tools using a modular design.
  • Enables enterprises to expand their infrastructure management in scale and to seamlessly accommodate new technologies at the same time.

HPE Intelligent Management Center is also known as HPE IMC.

Buyer's Guide

Download the Network Management Applications Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: October 2021

HPE Intelligent Management Center Video

Archived HPE Intelligent Management Center Reviews (more than two years old)

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
ITCS user
Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Consultant
Using the Application Monitor add-on allows you to go deep into server, platform and application topologies,

What is most valuable?

It is amongst the most versatile NMSs on the market. It provides better device management for even some of their competitors' devices than their competitors' management software (particularly Cisco).

The ability for IMC to interrogate a network of any size (even thousands of network devices) in almost no time and quickly reveal the most intimate details and relationships is unmatched in the market. Coupled with this is HPE's constant improvement of the product with even minor releases offering significant enhancements.

Using the Application Monitor add-on allows you to go deep into server, platform and even application topologies, allowing this one tool to provide a complete overview of the health state of very broad and complex environments.

This is far and away the best tool of this type I have ever used.

How has it helped my organization?

I make a habit of installing IMC as the first step when I start analysing networks for issues and improvements. What I gain from 24 hours of analysis with IMC usually exceeds what I can derive from hundreds of pages of documentation. My end-state for an IMC deployment is that IT becomes the documentation for the environment, including tracking every historical change and issue that occurs from installation onward.

What needs improvement?

Documentation is pretty weak. HPE have an excellent They have a Youtube channel that provides some excellent guidance but the content is sporadically released (there have only been 2 videos in the last year) and unstructured (it seems to follow whatever the author wants to present rather than some structured curriculum). I think they could invest in building a more consistent training library for this product.

Additionally, it isn’t very intuitive to use. I understand why as they have had to make most elements as generic as possible in order to support as many equipment vendors as they can. This has the unfortunate flow-on effect of often being fairly difficult to configure specific elements; this could be easily improved through better documentation and design examples. These challenges make mastering IMC a fairly steep learning curve.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used it for six years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

Deployment in an enterprise environment - where you are using a separate SQL Server rather than SQL Express - can be somewhat counter-intuitive and requires a certain knowledge of SQL to do it right. IMC does not support integrated user accounts or dynamic SQL ports - two features that Microsoft recommends using. Based on my experience, I would suggest a SQL Server dedicated to IMC (virtual is fine).

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

When managing over 500 devices, you really need a bare-metal install rather than virtualized, or you can get terrible performance. This is documented but in a fairly vague location. Once moved to bare metal, even 5000+ devices caused little issue.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I have not encountered any scalability issues. I have deployed IMC for thousands of devices and spoken to people managing tens of thousands of devices. The scale-out ability of IMC - where you can split functions onto different, or even multiple, servers - means there are few real limits in an enterprise deployment, as long as you understand how to do it properly.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

One of the key benefits of IMC is that they are aggressively developing this product. They are very open to feature requests with any that make sense for multiple customers making their way into near-future releases.

Technical Support:

technical support is the one area where I have to rate HPE fairly poorly. Whilst I haven't seen many issues with IMC, when we have encountered them (particularly around inconsistencies in the topology views), getting them fixed can be a cumbersome process.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have used other solutions in the past, but none have compared to the versatility of IMC.

How was the initial setup?

I would say initial setup was medium, between straightforward and complex. The challenge, as with any NMS, is ensuring your devices are in a state to be managed (i.e., consistent SNMP communities, passwords, etc.). On the plus side, since many environments use default credentials, once all devices are ingested, creating scripts to establish high security (e.g., SNMPv3, SSH/SSL only) is a breeze.

What about the implementation team?

An in-house team implemented it.

What was our ROI?

It is difficult to put a dollar value on ROI, but in the last instance I would say that IMC allowed us to free up about two FTEs through the reduction in operational costs of the network.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

For a 50k user environment - ~1200 switches across 10 sites - we probably spent around $100k getting IMC fully perfected. The ongoing cost of maintenance is negligible.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

As we were deploying a predominantly HPE network, we didn't really need to consider other offerings.

What other advice do I have?

Out-of-the-box IMC is pretty good, but to really make it work for your organization, you need to invest the time to tailor it to your specific requirements. If you don't have someone with reasonable IMC experience in-house, consider a consultant to analyse your needs and assist in the overall deployment.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
it_user481908
Network Engineer at a construction company with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor
A lot of alerts with a lot of information that we weren't aware of before. They need to do a lot better job of optimizing the way the database is accessed by the solution.

What is most valuable?

Interoperability with non-Cisco, and non-HP equipment.

How has it helped my organization?

There are a lot of alerts with a lot of information coming our way that we weren't aware of before. It just started showing up after we configured it. It's a network management monitoring solution. We can get more in depth information, better troubleshooting, more information to troubleshoot with, which all helps us to solve problems faster.

What needs improvement?

The ease of use needs to be improved. It needs better automated provisioning, automated alert creation, automated scanning of the devices you add to do a better job of knowing what needs to be probed and what doesn't.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's very stable. It doesn't crash.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Issues with scalability and data retention. We're not a large enterprise and we have issues with data retention, with storing enough data so that we can get enough history. It's not a space problem, it's a database problem. They need to do a lot better job of optimizing the way the database is accessed by the solution. We're not even a big company and we have those problems. We switched as we needed something that was built to be on the server and run all the time.

How are customer service and technical support?

It's horrible. 90% of the time we're figuring out the solution ourselves. 10% of the time we'll get somebody that knows what they're doing and it's solved quickly. They don't even really know what their menus do. Most of the time we ask them, "What's this for? What's that for? What's this for?" They can't answer it. There aren't that many people who know it, there's not enough right people.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Lack of visibility into what was going on in our network. We had another solution, but it was not an enterprise class solution, it was unstable. We had SolarWinds Private Tool Set, which is not for enterprise. They have other enterprise products, but we didn't own it.

How was the initial setup?

It's not very straightforward at all. Very very difficult. Very time consuming. It is worth it, but it's very difficult. It's a deep, wide solution, there's a lot of technology in there, but it's difficult to get out of it what you need.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We considered Cisco Prime, and it was far and away better than Cisco Prime. We chose HPE for its interoperability with non-Cisco equipment, interoperability with non HP equipment, and customizable, and a deep feature set that Cisco Prime just didn't have because it's focused on Cisco stuff only. If I had to it over again, I'd probably go with an enterprise SolarWinds product.

What other advice do I have?

Look at SolarWinds. Look at PRTG.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.