The product is quite scalable. I would rate it a nine out of ten. We have around 40 users of it at the moment and only one person is needed to maintain it.

The solution is scalable. We have 1500 users and two administrators for HPE ProLiant ML.

I would rate the solution's scalability a ten out of ten. My company has more than 50 people for the product. We have mostly SMB customers. 

We have three ProLiant servers, and that's enough to meet our needs. 

It might be scalable because, until now, we haven't had the opportunity or requirement to scale it up. Maybe a couple of years down the line, we may need to scale it up because scalability was kept in mind when we initially provisioned it four to five years ago.

Currently, there are 15 to 20 users in our company. 

I have found HPE Proliant ML to be scalable.

We have approximately seven people using this solution in our company.

The product is scalable.

The Proliant ML is not very scalable because we can hardly increase the memory. The RAID support is also much less than what you get with the DL series.

We have between 10 and 15 Proliant servers and hundreds of users.

You can scale it. We don't scale it as such. We buy a product to suit our needs, and we've never needed to enhance it after we bought it out of the box. What we normally do is look at the specifications, see what that job entails, and build a server to those specifications. We look at a two or a three-year growth expectancy. That's one of the jobs I basically do.

We use them for remote offices, normally in pairs, and we haven’t had any issues. They’re easy to work on and can deal with tight quarters where it is really hot.

It has scaled for us without issues.

Scalability is there and it's very good.

It's very scalable.

It's scalable, depending on the services that you are running. This is a known factor, so you should plan for it.

We're able to scale it, though we're mainly adding older servers to this new one. Scalability is not the most important thing for us.