OpenText ALM / Quality Center ROI
MR
Manoj Ray
Quality Lead at Vodafone
The solution has saved time with background activities and helped my delivery to move forward. However, this application is a support function into our delivery.
View full review »The solution is priced high but it is worth the money. We received a return on investment.
View full review »LV
Leon Van Niekerk
Head of Testing at Pick n Pay
We've seen ROI plainly. We can do more projects. It's easier to do the maintenance. It might not be rands or dollars savings, but time-saving is definitely there.
Buyer's Guide
OpenText ALM / Quality Center
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about OpenText ALM / Quality Center. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
The ROI is worth it.
View full review »LG
Lisa Gordon
IS Director, ERP PTP Solution Architecture at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
We haven't calculated ROI but the time it would take to go through paper documentation versus digital is huge. I don't have any quantitative numbers on that. We also were able to enable automated testing using Micro Focuses UFT, which writes back to ALM for results. The time it takes to execute in itself has a return as well, but the time value is really on the UFT. The write back to ALM and to be able to document results in a single location is key.
View full review »We have experienced business-related benefits from the tool.
View full review »Giving an ROI on a software product is a complicated task. I like to use the Space Shuttle as an analogy. From an economist's point of view, he or she might say the Space Shuttle program cost billions of dollars and did not see nearly that amount in hard dollars generated from resources/time saved in return. I believe NASA did get paid to put satellites into orbit via the Shuttle for private companies but it was less than the whole costs. On the other hand, a scientist could say the Space Shuttle program made many significant discoveries and also put into orbit the Hubble Telescope which discovered and took pictures of the Universe that was not possible from Earth. The Economist would just use a formula to calculate a number stating it is a bad ROI. The Scientist would say the Shuttle definitely added value by making new discoveries that advanced science so far that it cannot be measured in dollars and say it is a good ROI. My point here is that "what is the ROI" is a common question at companies and it can vary greatly on how a person approaches and perceives it.
With all this in mind, my answer is that Quality Center definitely adds value to an organization and over the long run has a positive ROI that will keep increasing over time primarily by saving time for users the more they use the functionality of all the modules. For example, using Quality Center to schedule automated test suites to run unattended increases ROI.
While comparing to the previous solution, this solution gave us as much as 60% cost savings.
View full review »AY
Ashish Yelkar
Managing Partner at Verve Square Technologies
We definitely feel that it has given us a huge advantage from a collaboration and time savings perspective.
It can reduce the wastage that happens in collaboration activities. The effort has definitely gone down. Effort and collaboration have been reduced by 60 percent.
View full review »Quality Center can be a bit costly, but the ROI is great for all the great features you get.
View full review »ST
Shinu Thulaseedharan
IT Quality and Architecture Senior Manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
We have definitely seen return on our investment in Micro Focus. Imagine the amount of hours that our guys would be spending tracking stuff in Excel. If you look at the number of man-days that my team would have to spend on that and at the licensing costs, of course it is worth it. I'm very happy with it.
View full review »CG
Caroline Gitonga
Presales Consultant at Oracle
We haven't yet computed the ROI.
View full review »At a Fortune 100 company, we achieved a reduction of 30% of defects in the first year and decreasing percentages the subsequent years.
The dollar figures were proprietary, but were significant even for an $11 billion dollar revenue company.
View full review »JO
John ONeill
Principle consultant at Active Data Consulting Services Pty Ltd
Substantial, the payment platform is an essential customer service.
View full review »It's unknown, but I suspect it to be quite significant.
View full review »We have other tools with HP, so it's bundled in with these and hard to measure ROI specifically for one tool.
View full review »I hate to say we haven't taken an independent project level analysis of ROI -- at this point, it's more an integral part of our application support model and a focal point for project level activities. Overall, even if informally measured, it's very high, if by no other measure than how deeply ingrained it has become in our project methodology and project tracking metrics.
View full review »We haven’t really calculated ROI on our testing efforts as of yet.
View full review »
Having HP ALM has helped in streamlining the Performance testing projects and now management has a better view of the projects and their status. It also helped us in streamlining the work across various groups.
View full review »
AB
reviewer1074789
Test Specialist at a consultancy with self employed
Testing time has decreased for manual execution because tests are being executed with UFT.
ROI is very difficult to say. If you don't test, you don't know how good or poor your quality is, but effective testing always costs money. However, it is very important for your return investment to know the value of your tests. What I've seen until now is that it's not being monitored that much. We have this tool because we need to test and prove the quality of the tests that we have been doing, but there will always be bugs and defects in production.
View full review »6/10.
View full review »I don’t know the ROI in monetary terms, but certainly ALM helped me get more people to follow testing standards and practices.
View full review »The implementation ROI highly depends on the size of the project the tool will be used for in the future. For big SAP implementations, ROI will be gained after the first project.
View full review »It's 300%.
View full review »We've seen ROI, but I can't share any specifics.
View full review »Though we only purchased ALM less than a year ago, we believe ROI is good.
View full review »EZ
reviewer1262124
Test Solution Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The tools might be good but the way we were utilized them was not effective. People have different ways to use the tools and we did not have a standard or conventional way. It would have been more beneficial if everybody followed a set of standards. Making the tools less complex would be better.
View full review »I don't have exact figures, but we are saving time and money using this solution.
View full review »It's not so good because some users don't see its real potential because they are afraid they will lose their job.
View full review »RS
Ravi Suvvari
Performance and Fault-tolerance Architect with 1,001-5,000 employees
100%
View full review »11 months.
View full review »Good.
View full review »We didn't look through the ROI of using this product. We look more into the ROI of automated tests.
View full review »The value created was high in our project as were dealing with an application with high public exposure, so the smooth working of tracking requirements and defects definitely gave a good ROI.
View full review »We've never calculated it.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
OpenText ALM / Quality Center
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about OpenText ALM / Quality Center. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.