HPE SimpliVity Alternatives and Competitors
Read reviews of HPE SimpliVity alternatives and competitors
Systems Administrator at Hospice of the Western Reserve
Sep 2, 2019
Gives us full redundancy - compute and the storage - we could lose a full node and still keep everything up and running
What is our primary use case?We are using the system to run our various virtual machines in a Hyper-V cluster. They run services such as SQL Servers, our Skype for Business phone system, some financial applications, various domain services, and SharePoint servers, among other miscellaneous systems. We use StarWind’s HyperConverged Appliance in one of our server rooms and plan on upgrading more legacy equipment at another location next year. We have it set up as a Microsoft Hyper-V private cloud.
Pros and Cons
- "The biggest thing we were looking for was redundancy, with both the compute and the storage, so that way we could lose a full node and still keep everything up and running, and not have to worry about it... StarWind was able to provide a solution for what we wanted, - to provide for redundancy."
- "We haven't had to use the ProActive Premium Support feature much yet. But they contacted me one time because there was a glitch on one server, a networking issue... I have not seen the problem since."
What other advice do I have?The biggest lesson that we've learned from using it is to let somebody else do all the hard work of finding the right configuration and putting together the hardware. It will save you a lot of time and get you up and running a lot quicker. With our previous solution, there was a lot of trial and error and learning. The StarWind solution was basically: plug it in, configure it for a few hours, and start moving virtual machines onto it. It seems like a great product. It does what it's supposed to do and it does it very quickly. Besides making it free, I don't know what they can do to improve it…
Director Of Information Technology at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
Real UserTop 20
Nov 10, 2020
Stable with good technical support and good integration capabilities
What is our primary use case?We primarily use the solution to run the loudmouth to host our virtual server's core courses.
Pros and Cons
- "You don't have to worry too much about the hardware and you don't have to work on integrating a storage device. We instead have this as an all-in-one solution and everything is available as a box."
- "Right now, it's difficult for a non-technical person to participate in using the product. It could be made more consumer-friendly."
What other advice do I have?We're just a customer. We don't have a relationship with Dell. We just procured the latest version of the solution. When we decided on our requirements, we had multiple calls with Dell and the attorneys to ensure that we received what we needed. Apart from choosing various generations or various models on VxRail boxes, we also took to deep dive into the actual configuration on each processor to understand how much memory to use. It's easier if you have a technical professional on your side when you're dealing with Dell. I'm a technical person, so I could get into the weeds with them. If you…
Director of Network Operations at a government
Jul 1, 2019
Offers the ability to individually upgrade specific parts of the product and is easy to manage
What is our primary use case?The primary use we have for this product is to act as a server and for storage.
Pros and Cons
- "The product is easy to manage and flexible for upgrading without major changes."
- "The product needs work in the area of deduplication which currently is inefficient."
What other advice do I have?I can safely rate this product as an eight out of ten. This is because it's scalable and you can upgrade it as if you are upgrading a server. In any other solution with hyper-convergence, you can't do that, so you've got to buy a node part to upgrade memory. Anyone considering this solution should define their requirements. It's not a solution for everybody. If you're using a lot of storage, hyper-convergence might not be good for you. We don't have a lot of storage, so it is a functional and desirable solution for us. If you have much greater storage needs, it may not be a good solution.
IT Infrastructure Specialist at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Dec 5, 2020
Good unified administration, very stable, and easy to set up
What is our primary use case?We primarily use the solution for remote offices as well as medium-sized businesses.
Pros and Cons
- "The solution's unified administration is its most valuable aspect."
- "The solution could maybe improve failure protection."
What other advice do I have?We are a partner of VMware. Customers considering the solution should be aware that the principal benefits they will get from the solution include integration with HCI, NSX, and cloud solutions. Overall, I would rate the solution nine ut of ten. We've had a good experience overall and our clients are happy with the product.
May 17, 2019
Simple to manage and has minimized our operational risk in case of disaster
What is our primary use case?Our primary use case is for a distributed virtual SAN over two data centers. Virtual SAN uses three servers in two data centers.
Pros and Cons
- "This solution has a very good user interface, with simple administration/management."
- "This product could be improved with the inclusion of new health check procedures."