HPE SimpliVity Room for Improvement
Senior Solutions Architect with 51-200 employees
They have made several technology changes. Compared to the previous version, SimpliVity was acquired by HPE and now the product has totally changed.
Initially, the response was great with SimpliVity. After the technology changed the feedback from customers was not good. As a result, we no longer focus on Simplivity.
Our focus is more on Nutanix Hyperconverged.
SimpliVity has very limited options for the virtualization layer. They may have to with VMware or something similar.
The flexibility should be present. It should be the customer's choice of what virtualization layer they will choose, and not mandated from the solution that you have to use VMware. VMware is not cheap. It comes with its own cost.
If the customer has the option to go with the Microsoft Hyper-V then customers should get the flexibility to have Hyper-V in place of the hypervisor.
Ultimately, the hypervisor functionality by default when you go for the data center becomes more cost-effective.
It should have the intelligence, to alert you that a failure of the cache is about to happen. It should be able to give you the predictive alarm and it should create its own backup.
It should have some provision where the cache is being copied to another location. So when one copy has been deleted or a copy has been corrupted, we should be able to recover it from the other site to ensure the office data is secure.
It should have some provision wherein the cache is being copied to some other location so that even if one copy has been deleted or one copy has been corrupted, we are able to recover it from the other location which will keep the office data secure.
From a product perspective, it should be more flexible.
It should allow users to have more data control in areas such as the cache. It should allow the user to have more data reduction flexibility.
Data reduction is something that is completely missing in the current solution, once SimpliVity was bought by HPE. It was the primary reason customers were interested in it.
SimpliVity handles the data. HCI is about how RAID is maintained over the network, and how many duplicate copies have been stored, or whether you are going for RF2 or RF3. Those things have to be taken into consideration.
With VMware,vSAN, and SimpliVity they are more dependent on the cache. If the cache fails then I have to recover the data. It's complete downtown for me. Anytime the data is not recovered, it's business downtime.
The biggest feature, which should be included, is some method to handle archival backup or cloud-based backup. Where SimpliVIty typically falls down with their data structure is: The longer a backup is kept, the more space it ends up inevitably using. When you get into things that you have to keep for five or seven years for legal requirements or regulatory compliance, then you start taking up a lot of space with these old dead backups that you are probably never going to use again. Being able to offload those to a separate platform or cloud storage location would be ideal.View full review »
Chief System & Security Officer at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
The product is expensive. We are in Turkey and the Turkish Lira currency is higher than in other countries. $1 is about 9 Turkish Lira now. If you buy something in US dollars, and if you calculate it in our currency, that means we need to multiply the total by nine. It's costly.
The initial configuration is complicated. HPE had to help us.
HPE is complex.
HPE SimpliVity uses some additional memory inside in order to do site infrastructure work. However, you need to calculate this. You need to make sure you have enough memory and CPU for your purposes now and in the future. However, they don't explain that you might lose, for example, 10% of memory during configuration. Knowing that might affect what you actually need in the long run. They really have to lay out for their customers at the outset what is used and how much space is taken up, et cetera. That way, you can calculate that into your capacity.
Senior Engineer at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
SimpliVity has this thing where if a virtual machine is on the wrong node with two nodes, it will be optimized. However, if one of the nodes won't be optimized, then it will complain about that. It will give you a little warning to say the source is not optimized. Please move this to one of the other hosts. They should just add a little thing in SimpliVity to move all the VMs to the right host, because it is a pain to load balance across the three nodes when all these VMs are complaining and you have to move them to one. It's sort of silly. I feel like it would be like half a day of programming for somebody to write something that would just auto-balance it.
The vCenter integration could probably improve a little. It is just a plugin that you are interacting with, and it feels like it has been largely the same for a while. It could probably get better.View full review »
Pre-sales Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
The price is one of the biggest problems our customers have. The solution is great, but at the end of the day, it's expensive. Compared to other solutions on the market, like Nutanix or vSAN, you are paying for something else. In this case, I have to explain the big differences within HPE SimpliVity. Overall, the biggest issue I have is regarding the price.
The problem is not necessarily with the HPE SimpliVity console itself because it's very easy to integrate with. Sometimes, our customers just want to have the opportunity to have the freedom to choose between Hyper-V and VMware. We love that kind of possibility.
It's not so frequently that we have a request about Hyper-V, but our customers do ask about the differences regarding licensing prices because at the end of the day, with Microsoft, the hypervisor is included with the operating system — that saves money.
The feature that I would like to see improved in the next release is migrations. There needs to be a simple process for migrating one SimpliVity cluster to a new SimpliVity cluster.View full review »
IT Manager at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
My main problem with the solution is that it is taking too much memory for something that we don't build. We are not creating the VM; it is created by the deployment. It is the SimpliVity solution which is using the memory that I was counting on for my production part. This is the biggest problem that I have. I know that the VM has to built there, but I would hope that they have a different area in the system to use this different type of memory. The production memory should stay with the customer when the machine is built, and during deployment, it should use different memory.View full review »
Senior Product Manager at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
It is not so cheap, and this is the most common complaint that my customers have. It is a very good product, but the price is an issue in Latin America.
VMware is a de facto tool. It would be useful for customers if HP can also use Red Hat or any other open-source virtualization product. Currently, you can only use VMware to manage the machines inside SimpliVity.View full review »
To install or to update it is more complicated than other solutions.
They can automate a lot of things. We do a lot of things manually and this is somewhat unnecessary. For example, the installation of a plug-in, or VMware, and so on. If you can automate all these things, like Nutanix, you get a better result. It's very simple to install Nutanix. You click and wait. The whole implementation is pretty automatic. SimpliVity will be very, very good if it can automate many aspects of the deployment.
It would be ideal if they could include OpenView managers in one place with all the equipment.View full review »
IT architect - Hosting and Cloud at Kraft Heinz
I would like to see an option to add external storage that can be seen by all of the nodes in a stack. For example, if I need to build a file share, or something, where there is not enough data than needs to be accessed quickly, but there is a lot of data, putting a large file share or user file share on SimpliVity currently doesn't makes sense.
We had failures out-of-the-box of our new technology along with a few bugs during the initial setup. Our initial five nodes had three power failures during setup.
The OmniStack module needs improvement, because from what I have read, the newer versions use even more memory. So, as we upgrade, we lose resources available for systems.View full review »
Assistant Manager - IT & IS at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
There's nothing overly special or unique about the solution.
Overall, SimpliVity has a lot of features, however, those features need to be more precise. It's like a jack of all trades and master of none. It needs to hone in on a few features and really make them shine.
SimpliVity claims to have what you call a compression and dedup ratio, however, in practice, it doesn't really work.
They need to give more controls and more features as far as the backup is concerned.
The initial setup is not that easy.
The licensing could be more clear.
The technical support isn't ideal right now.View full review »
We had some hardware compatibility issues with the earlier versions of HPE SimpliVity. We upgraded to the latest version a few months ago, and since then, there is no hardware failure, and it is better.
They don't provide a portal to create a ticket directly for the HPE SimpliVity. We have a web portal to create a ticket when we have an issue, but for HPE SimpliVity, we need to call the local vendor for support. If they are not able to resolve the issue, they contact the global support, which takes more time.
Technology is moving very fast, and everybody nowadays is focusing on the cloud base. In the future, they should integrate it with the cloud base for the backup.View full review »
In my experience, the only improvement that can be made is the price. It is much more costly than other solutions such as VxRail.
We would like to provide our customers with a virtual demo and have not been able to find this available. We don't have access to show the demo virtually to our customers or partners. This is lacking in this sector. We are not able to provide hands-on experience.
The centric management could be simplified or more user-friendly. Customers require an easier way to handle any product.View full review »
Senior Engineer at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
There is room for improvement in that there is a need for so many Federation nodes. It would help if they increased that capacity so that we didn't have to have so much hardware in our secondary site.View full review »
Consultant at a tech services company
Senior Systems Engineer - Midrange Hardware Standards at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
The upgrade path needs to be better defined on the spec sheets. I would like hard numbers to be revealed to me, instead of being hidden by, "We have to go to HPE to get you a special request, then fill a part number for me."View full review »
Systems Engineer at Sempra
It crashes often. When one particular VM has random, large IOPS requests, it will bog down the node, and there isn't enough time for the replica to be brought up. So all the VMs on that one particular node will essentially become offline.
If it's not already included, an additional feature I would like to see would be better Storage vMotion. That would be number one on my wish list.View full review »
IT Engineer at a government with 201-500 employees
Prior to the latest release, it was a real pain to upgrade SimpliVity. First, the host server had to be upgraded with the latest drivers, followed by an upgrade of the OmniStack controller software, and lastly, an upgrade of the VMware ESXi software. Each of the three steps were done independently and the process took 2 to 3 hours per node. Starting with the 4.0 Release, an Upgrade Manager orchestrates the whole process and greatly simplifies it. It still takes 2+ hours per node, however.
Chief Technology Officer at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
Senior IT Specialist at Servicios de Consultorias de IT
In terms of what should be improved, I think that the local support in Argentina is not good. This is a new technology and HPE doesn't have a lot of technology specialists here in Argentina. It's very hard to find the specialist here.
Additionally, the price must be better. Here in Argentina, Dell is very competitive. If the client doesn't understand the functionality that SimpliVity has, he will chose by price, and Dell is very, very competitive here in Argentina.
Lastly, Stretched Cluster is a new functionality and is something that the client needs.View full review »
The solution needs to improve the high data availability.
The backup and recovery process needs to be faster. Right now, it's a bit slow.
There needs to be more customization capabilities available for customers. That's lacking and clients would really like it if they could better customize the product to better fit their needs.View full review »
Product Manager at Nuxiba
There is room for improvement in the operations area because the support for that server space is minimal. I want to sell a solution, but not bigger than the one I have. Maybe they can offer more features for more customers and optimize it, but with the same protections that I already have right now.
I want to replicate my business offering in the United States. I want to pay for HPE SimpliVity in Mexico, but they told me that it's not possible. They told me that I need to look for a representative in the United States and make all the payments over there.View full review »
Co-Founder at BIGBOOM ASIA CO.,LTD.
We haven't really explored all areas of this solution we are still in the POC phase.
Pricing and monitoring could be improved.
I think that they should have their own hyper-converged system.View full review »
It would be good to have more compatibility with other solutions as an improvement in the future. As a suggestion, in order to have compatibility with other solutions, there could be a license fee for this, and if you don't need to them then you do not need to pay.View full review »
Lead Systems Engineer at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would like them to add more connection capability, a hub and spoke model, to improve the number of connections that it can handle. That would be helpful because we have a lot of retail stores.
There are certain technical things that we run into. There's a matrix compatibility where, if you upgrade one piece, the rest have to fall into line. If that requirement could be eased up a bit it would be a good thing.View full review »
IT Analyst at a local government with 1,001-5,000 employees
There are a lot of features that they need to improve on, such as the backup and DR feature sets. I would also like to see it able to restore item levels, especially for databases. They don't have that right now.View full review »
Production Support Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
HPE could give us more options for server models to chose when using the product. Right now, we can only use the DL380.View full review »
Senior Project Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would like to see support for having different clustered environments for production and testing.
When it comes to performing backups, the dashboard is not intuitive and not user-friendly. This is something that should be improved. It should be easier to perform backups.View full review »
I think the licensing cost could be lower.View full review »
IT Manager at Penoles
We would like to have more security with the solution.View full review »
Senior Manager at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
HPE SimpliVity needs improvement. I know there were some difficulties on the Hyper-V side. They worked very well on the VMware but unfortunately, Hyper-V is not well-developed. You have some bugs on it. On the small nodes, there's no problem, but on the medium and the big nodes they have some improvement to do on the Hyper-V.
Because Hyper-V is not very stable on SimpliVity, we would like a way that they can make an improvement on this, because many of our customers are only on Microsoft and would not like to move on VMware. It would be very nice if we can have a very stable solution for Hyper-V, on the hyper-converged side, so that when you have customers on VMware or Hyper-V we can provide a solution that is stable.
When we make some upgrades to the platform, it does take time to stabilize the structure again.
We would like a simple interface to use.View full review »
IT Director at Celgene Corporation
I don't think it's as simple as it is marketed, but it is a new product. Since it is a newer solution, there needs to be more knowledge transfer out there. The product needs more maturity because of the industry.View full review »
Line Technical Agent at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
They should optimize the administration stack because it is consuming too much memory. It ends up consuming 20% of memory. They have another product for this feature, but I would like to have this feature within HPE SimpliVity.View full review »
Co-Founder/CTO at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
There are a lot of different components to choose from in the chassis. This could be easier by providing a standard or a base model to create and configure from.
System Engineer (Storage/HCI) at a construction company with 201-500 employees
I'd like to see some improvements in terms of simplifying deployment and making it more user friendly. I think the technical support could be improved as well.
I have a free project with SimpliVity deployment in the next three months. What can be improved is that in one or two of these projects, I need a cloud backup for the infrastructure and data.
As for the infrastructure of the product as it relates to customer size, it is not very good at this moment in Peru.
I need a solution for the cloud. In Peru, it's a three or four solution provider for cloud services.View full review »
Senior Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Its performance can be faster.View full review »
Senior System Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
HPE SimpliVity should cost less.View full review »