More than 300 users are using this solution every day.

I rate the solution’s scalability a five out of ten.

I find HPE StorageWorks MSA's scalability somewhat limited. While it is expensive, the main drawback is that the configuration, especially for connections, is fixed. Once set, you can't change or expand certain aspects like network ports, CPU, and memory. While you can expand storage capacity, it lacks flexibility in modifying the initial setup, making it less adaptable to changing needs. I would recommend HPE StorageWorks MSA for small to medium-sized enterprises. It might be less suitable for larger companies with more extensive storage needs, where more advanced solutions could be necessary.

There are models that are scalable. So you just have to choose which model you are going to recommend to customers based on the sizing. More than 20 of our customers are using HPE StorageWorks MSA.

It is a scalable solution. I would rate the solution a ten out of ten. We approximately have more than 35 clients.

They can scale; I don't think they're meant to, but you can add additional shelves and things, which we've done. That's fairly easy to do.

It is definitely scalable. Like I was saying a little earlier, we use them in all our areas because we know that they're scalable. We can use them to scale up our program area if the area grows.

The scalability is decent. It's possible to add additional bays for the drives, but I don't know how many you can add. 

They're scalable for offsite and we love them.

The scalability is very good. This environment is part of our infrastructure. We are an internet service provider (ISP), so we have our own infrastructure hosted. This includes our link monitoring systems and the authentication service center. We also host a large number of customer workloads on virtual machines, which are all running on this system.

The solution is scalable and you can add additional bays. At some stage, you will need additional TCs.

We've never tested that scalability. We've never tried to upgrade the service or expand it. Therefore, it wouldn't be possible to comment on its capabilities or our experiences.

We have different IP cameras. There are around 450. In terms of operators, we have just three.

We do plan to continue to use the solution, at least for the next two years or so.

We have two of these units and we replicate between them with our sister company.

When we purchased it, we had some open drive bays. If we had needed to expand then we could have, but we never had the need to do so.

None. Running 7k drives and 10K drives with SSD caching.

For our environment, you can scale several times and that’s exactly what we need. You can’t go beyond four servers for the SaaS connected version, but for us that’s what we needed exactly.

I have found the solution to be scalable.

We have approximately 20 customers using this solution.

It's designed for small businesses, not for a large enterprise. The enclosures are enough for this amount of storage. With the sixth generation, we can have nine enclosures and add them to a base chassis.

The scalability could be improved, but it's enough for a small business. If you have a large business, you should opt for HPE Primera or Nimble.