Huawei Wireless Previous Solutions

Fahad Doguwa - PeerSpot reviewer
Deputy Manager at Central Bank of Nigeria

We used Cisco. Later, we switched to Huawei Wireless for better pricing.

View full review »
DI
Technical Consultant at Osit

Against Huawei Wireless, my company considers products like Aruba and Ruckus. H3C is also one of Huawei Wireless's competitors in the local market.

View full review »
BS
Senior System Administrator at WIT

Currently performance/price is very good for Huawei

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Huawei Wireless
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Huawei Wireless. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Angel Georev - PeerSpot reviewer
Product Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I've used Aruba, Ubiquiti, and Netgear, apart from Huawei Wireless, because my company also sells those brands.

View full review »
Azedine ADJTOUTAH - PeerSpot reviewer
Distributor at ALGERIA BUSINESS MULTIMEDIA

We always use Huawei products. They are the best.

View full review »
RG
Senior Software Engineer at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees

I did not use other solutions prior to the current one. 

View full review »
CM
Technician at Telone Zimbabwe (Pvt) Ltd

My clients prefer Huawei Wireless to Cisco because it is cheaper and more readily available. The suppliers for Cisco are not that consistent these days.

View full review »
Yaser-Altwailey - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Engineer at Saudi Customs

I have used Cisco solutions previously. I have found Cisco to have better durability than Huawei Wireless. However, the price of Huawei Wireless is less expensive and has better coverage.

View full review »
SB
Co-Founder at DataDistinct Solutions

We also use Cisco. We're partners with them as well.

We've used Aruba, however, I find the solution quite bad.

View full review »
JR
Infrastructure Project Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

We replaced Cisco with this solution. It was a very old solution. Something like 10 years ago Cisco was implemented and it needed to be replaced. This Huawei solution is based on WiFi 6, which is the latest protocol available for WiFi.

View full review »
DM
facility manager

I haven't used any other wireless products in the past.

View full review »
MV
Security Operations Center Analyst at PULSOC

I did use other solutions previously. It was a long time ago, and I can't remember which brands I used. 

View full review »
YA
Network Engineer at Saudi Customs

We previously used HP solutions in the past.

View full review »
SA
Network Engineering at INNOVATION PARTNER

We previously used Cisco wireless. We switched due to a decision made by our management team.

View full review »
MS
Manager, ICT and Partnerships at a comms service provider with 201-500 employees

We have different vendors we work with. We work with Cisco and Aruba as well.

View full review »
TX
IT at a manufacturing company with 201-500 employees

I also have experience with Cisco.

Both are good brands and good network device providers. Huawei may be the one to choose based on the requirements and based on the bandwidth. Different providers have different costs and a few different features. However, both brands are okay and are good.

View full review »
Miar Ahmad - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at Inspire for Solutions Development

I tried other solutions but they were not very stable.

View full review »
XL
Solutions Manager at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

I also have a little bit of experience with Cisco and Aruba Wireless products. I find that the Aruba administration interface is more difficult to use than the other two. Huawei is cheaper than both Cisco and Aruba.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
Huawei Wireless
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Huawei Wireless. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.