Hyper-V Alternatives and Competitors
Read reviews of Hyper-V alternatives and competitors
Product Specialist at Schoemans Offcie Systems (Pty) Ltd
Oct 20, 2019
Fast, very easy to use, and is rock-solid stable
What is our primary use case?We use VirtualBox for running our ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) and a host of websites. The underlying operating system is Solaris, which we run on VirtualBox virtualized, and it is running exceptionally well. Then I run VirtualBox as a hypervisor and use Windows (when necessary) and Linux. I run a whole host of websites on Linux virtualized using VirtualBox and we also run our ERP — Xpert ERP — on VirtualBox.
Pros and Cons
- "This product is extremely easy to install, use, has a great GUI and is incredibly stable."
- "It could improve slightly with enhanced reporting capabilities that show the current status of the network."
What other advice do I have?The VirtualBox solution is an absolute gem of a product. I definitely recommend this product to other people because it's super stable and easy to install and use. The only thing you need to ensure on your server is that you have sufficient hardware resources to accomplish what you want to do and that you supply the server with clean power. The server needs to be running all the time or you will have problems. If you put the box on a UPS (Uninterruptible Power Supply), you are all set. I choose to run the product on-premises all the time for our deployment and also for deployments to my…
Server Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Nov 27, 2020
Good high availability, easy to scale, and pretty stable overall
What is our primary use case?We primarily use the solution for everything Microsoft-related for the most part. I would say our visualization platform is about 99.5% of all our workload from a Microsoft point of view
Pros and Cons
- "The solution has high availability."
- "The biggest pain point is probably the firmware management of the underlying hardware. It could be a lot better."
What other advice do I have?We're just customers. We are a little behind the latest version, which I believe is 7.1. We're using 6.5 for the most part. We still have a little bit of a legacy in 5.5, however, that is just hardware related. It doesn't support the newer version. We trying to rectify that as soon as possible. I would recommend the solution to other companies. Overall, I would rate the solution nine out of ten.
Syed FasihUr Rahman
Enterprise Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Oct 17, 2019
User-friendly interface and no licensing fees, but technical support needs to be improved
What is our primary use case?We are a system integration company and we sell hyper-converged infrastructure as the new model data center technology. This is one of the solutions that we provide to our customers. This solution can be deployed on-premises or in a cloud-based environment, but the majority of deployments are on-premises.
Pros and Cons
- "The interface is very good, and quite user-friendly."
- "The technical support for this solution needs to be improved in terms of response time."
What other advice do I have?This is the number one hyper-converged solution in the market. No doubt about it. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
IT Infrastructure Lead at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Jul 28, 2020
Stable, with good resource management, but needs to allow more access to documentation
What is our primary use case?The solution is primarily used for server virtualization. We have opportunities that we want to learn from. For our customers, we recommend this product. We have Oracle databases or Oracle, Linux, or Red Hat Linux to run it on a virtual machine, and Oracle VM fits perfectly into that.
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable aspect of the solution is the resource management from the OVM Manager."
- "You need to have a model for documentation available for the users. Right now, if you have to search for some troubleshooting, you need to have Oracle login. Many personnel might not have that login. The reach, the availability of information to the end-user, is not there."
What other advice do I have?We're partners with Oracle. We're consultants. My advice to other potential users is this: nothing is better than planning. It's much in a better way to start a project. That way, you understand how much it is that you need to have or how many servers you require. It seldom matters when you deploy in the virtual environment. You need to be very hands-on in Linux environments. I come from a Windows background. I am not a Linux user, for the most part. That said, fo this project, I learned Linux. I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.
System Engineer at Unistar
Real UserTop 5
Feb 7, 2020
A stable solution that offers good control over hardware resources
What is our primary use case?We are a system integrator and IBM PowerVM is one of the solutions that we implement for our clients. I am not a solution architect, but I provide assistance with PowerVM. It is primarily used for business-critical operations like SAP or Oracle databases.
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature is the flexibility in terms of managing the hardware resources such as RAM, CPU, and the network."
- "The interface is not user-friendly in places, so it could use some improvement."