Hyper-V Previous Solutions

Brad Brundage
Technology Systems Analyst with 1-10 employees
VMware - the cost. Because Hyper-V is free, and you get a lot of the solutions that you've got to pay tens of thousands of dollars for with VMware. It's free under Microsoft. And they've really polished it in the past two years. It's pretty good. View full review »
Jarek Słupiński
Freelancer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
We previously used VMware, but we switched because Hyper-V is cheaper and delivers the same stability for less money. View full review »
John Ermolowich
Technician at Computer Geeks
We previously used a Linux KVM based hypervisor called Proxmox. View full review »
Assistant Manager - IS Infrastructure
We used to use GenServer. Unfortunately, GenServer does not support a 10-gigabyte network, but Hyper-V does. This was a major factor in our switch to Hyper-V. View full review »
Muhammad Tariq
Program Architect (Microsoft) with 5,001-10,000 employees
I have previous experience with Citrix and VMware products. View full review »
System Administrator at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
In comparison to VMware, Hyper-V is much better at restoration and backup. It is also much faster than VMware. View full review »
Head of Department for IT Services at a government with 201-500 employees
We previously used VMware and then moved to Hyper-V. We did so primarily because we already had an agreement with Microsoft. View full review »
IT at a non-profit
We used to use VMware. View full review »
Systems Architect at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Previously used VMware. Switched due to cost. View full review »
Interim Director of Technology at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We previously used a regular Windows 2012 server before using Hyper-V. View full review »
Network Administrator II at a maritime company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We previously used VMware. View full review »

Sign Up with Email