IBM B2B Integrator Competitors and Alternatives

Read reviews of IBM B2B Integrator competitors and alternatives
Seeburger
Real User
EDI Competence Center Manager NA at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
Apr 23 2017

What is most valuable?

* Ability to have one system that can handle any protocol: One of the strongest features * No need to have multiple systems for different types of communication protocols * The software can run on any platform: Makes it very flexible

How has it helped my organization?

We minimized our complexity and decreased the number of systems to communicate with our partners. These are the biggest advantages that yield cost savings. Everything now is centralized. This platform is the gate to our suppliers and customers.

What needs improvement?

* The interface and logging of messages could be more simplified. Everything is in Java and uses hash codes or UUID codes. This sometimes makes it very hard to know what has happened or what issue you might have. * They could fix their... more»
Real User
Integration Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Jul 17 2017

What is most valuable?

* Capability to handle almost all e-business standards: RosettaNet, EDI, ebXML Messaging Service, SWIFT, FIX, and CIDX * Web-based user interface: Makes administration and monitoring much easier * Segregation of user tasks: Controlled user... more»

How has it helped my organization?

* We could set up all trading partners in one place with different data transfer protocols * Makes the middleware environment more efficient * Helps the admin team: Has a clear view on transactions and their processing status without digging... more»

What needs improvement?

Configuration and interaction of trading partners in the TN with an ActiveTransfer product.
MuleSoft
Real User
Principal Architect And Management Council Member at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Aug 21 2017

What do you think of Mule ESB?

Valuable Features: In order of importance: - Connectors - Data Weave - Mule Expression Language • Improvements to My Organization: It has changed our approach towards integration, making plumbing functions such as HTTP/Messaging listener services, data transformation and connection handling redundant. • Room for Improvement: Documentation is cryptic, product releases are far too frequent, and upgrades become troublesome. • Use of Solution: 1 year as a developer and architect. • Deployment Issues: Deployment of custom flows is troublesome and fraught with difficulty

Sign Up with Email