The tool was very easy to scale. If someone understands how to read a process, then the learning curve is very, very simple. We had a three to five-hour training session. After that, it was very easy for anyone to scale. It was pretty easy to onboard. Blueworks mostly works with enterprise businesses.

I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. 

There are ten users are currently using IBM BlueWorks Live in our organization.

The scalability is good.

We have three or four people using this solution in my organization. We use it for some projects, but not on a large scale as we do with ARIS Connect.

The solution has the capability to scale up to other colleagues but it's too hard to advise them to use.

20 persons are mainly working on the solution.

We don't have a lot of people using it. It is just for the analyst team. So, we never had to think about scalability.

We have not had any problems with scalability. You can do collaborative tasks as well. We have 50 users of this solution at our organization.

I'd rate scalability at nine out of ten, with ten being the best.

My company has more than 25 editors and 50 editors. I rate the tool's scalability a seven out of ten. 

I rate the scalability an eight out of ten.

It is scalable within a scope. 

It goes hand in hand with stability and keeping the tool light and you can keep adding elements. As you add more elements, it becomes a heavy toolset that takes up more on the cloud which will take longer to connect, experiencing latency.

Scalability is good. It's gotten more complex recently, but adding users is very easy to do. It's not a problem once you get to the tech support people. We have seven users and they're business and technical analysts or project coordinators. 

The solution can be used quite widely within different departments. This requires a bit of work for the administrator as they'd need to design different folders and access to them, but it is a scalable solution. Right now, in our company, we have about 50 users on it. Most are editors or contributors. I'm unsure as to if we plan to increase usage.

It's pretty big. We want to make this our go-to process diagram application. There are other vendors that we looked at. So far, IBM is the one that we're mostly interested in, but like I said before, there are flaws. There are groups, especially in compliance - even in our engineering - they want to see where we can improve in a process, where we can cut things down. They want to see where we're doubling employees doing the same work. So we're trying to save dollars by using this.

I don't have any issue with scalability.

It's a cloud-based solution.

It's very scalable, either horizontally, adding more servers to the cluster, or vertically, where we are increasing the server size. It is pretty easy to keep up with demand and being able to spin things up and down.

We had a few performance issues occasionally that frustrated the team.

The solution is scalable. It can work for companies that have 50,000 or 200,000 users and can be managed quite well.

Scalability is pretty good. 

I don't know about this actually. We didn't experience any problems with it, but we didn't use it at scale. It was fairly localized. I wouldn't have any concerns with using it at scale though.