I used standalone server. but it was much simple and safer to run in a cloud environment.

We are a deployment partner for pretty much all hyperscalers. We are in partnership with AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. Over the last six months, we are putting all of our efforts into IBM Cloud because we feel it's very stable and straightforward. There are no hidden charges.

We have been working with AWS for the last decade. AWS normally starts with very less value, but when you start using the application, at the end of the month, they send a huge bill. With IBM Cloud, there are no hidden charges. If they say $3, you will get the bill for only $3. We have also used Google Cloud and Azure, but we feel that IBM Cloud is the best one.

We also use Amazon Cloud.

In the past, I was using Google Cloud, Amazon, and IBM Bluemix (now IBM Cloud). I compared all of them and found that IBM Cloud was the best product.

Amazon is a little more stable than the others.

I have worked with AWS and Azure clouds. IBM Cloud is the cheapest of these three, and I found it to be more flexible in terms of third-party integration.

I previously used AWS. However, I have little experience with the product. However, I still occasionally use it. 

We looked at Oracle as well. We switched to IBM because IBM had a professional approach. They cared about our business and what we could do. The way they were preoccupied with our concerns as a customer, as well as a service provider, impressed us. Their response was very fast and they came up with the best solution that they could provide for the users, so that's why we switched. They also had other technology, including the IBM Watson Cloud, which was preferable to Oracle.

I have experience with AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google, and Oracle, and I think that IBM is the provider with the fewest number of services available. They have a long path ahead of them, in terms of services that need to be implemented on their cloud.