IBM Cognos Room for Improvement
Senior Technical Coordinator - IM and BI at a healthcare company with 11-50 employees
So far we do not have any issues with the functionality. The cost per year could be improved. They are the leader in the industry and they charge a lot. If you are the end-user and you want to work with the leader you cannot complain about the cost and you have to pay for it.
If they were going to make improvements, I would say that they could do more related to big data. I think they were lacking in the initial phases of development in this area. I am not sure if they may have addressed these concerns already because I have not seen their new capabilities in more recent releases. But initially, it was lacking strength in the area of big data.
In terms of what could be improved, I would say, monitoring, monitoring, monitoring. Some improvements in monitoring would be helpful.
I'd like to see more monitoring of specific reports and fields. The way the auditing is now is very limited, so I'd like to see more of that - of the monitoring.View full review »
RPA Architect & RPA Product Owner at Francisco Sosa
The online documentation is good, but it could be better. If the documentation could provide more examples, it would be nice.
It would be nice to offer free online training on the tool for end-users.View full review »
Senior Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
As we get new requirements, we need to see if they fit into Cognos. As of right now, it fits our needs, however, that can change.
We've had issues in the past that the solution is still working to resolve.
The solution seems to slow down the servers. We're working with IBM to see if this can be resolved.View full review »
Manager - Metrics & Analytics at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Overall, there aren't any features that are lacking in the product.
The AI-based features could be further enhanced by the solution.
I'd like to see more predictive analytics enhancements in future releases.View full review »
The performance is a bottleneck and something that can be improved. The way they have designed the framework, the framework manager is a critical part. If you have a properly-designed framework manager then whatever stories you generate through the Report Studio or Query Studio will give you better results. However, if the modeling is incorrect then it will kill your free memory and detract from the performance.
You have to have complete control of the data model, including the hierarchy and the relationships. There are still a lot of loose ends. The way that a many-to-many relationship can be defined within the framework should be brought into the Report Studio and Query Studio. This would be an improvement.
There can be a recursive effect, where you are pulling resources away from the users. This will eat away the resources and cause them a lot of lag time in their reporting.View full review »