I rate FlashSystem nine out of 10 for stability. 

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

The solution is stable and has no issues.

We had stability issues as stated elsewhere.

IBM FlashSystem is one hundred percent stable. My customers didn't encounter any failures, so it's good.

The stability of the solution is very good. We haven't detected any bugs or glitches. it doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

I give the stability a nine out of ten. The latest versions of Virtualize, from 8.5 and above, are highly reliable. I have not had any complaints from customers about them.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten for stability. I have experienced one problem and that was solved by EBM. It was for a FS 5,200. I had to connect to an IBM i system without some switches. I was the second or third customer who did it, worldwide. They had to make a special patch for it.

IBM FlashSystem is a stable solution.

The solution is stable and has good performance.

If you set it up correctly, it is very stable. After we configured it correctly, we didn't have any issues. I didn't have any issues after the first week of the configuration.

It is stable. 

I rate the tool’s stability a nine out of ten.

The solution is very stable so stability is rated a ten out of ten. 

IBM FlashSystem is a very stable solution and its default rate is low. In the past four to five months we only received one default.

This is a stable solution. 

The solution is currently hosting our core banking system and we haven't faced any stability issues, so it is very stable.

It is a stable solution, and I would give the stability a rating between eight and ten.

It's very stable as a single system or you can have it as a cluster for redundancy. We haven't had any issues, as far as I know, of it crashing or something that might make you suspicious about the reliability of the system. It is really reliable. The system engineers we work with have no doubt regarding any stability issues.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten for stability.

IBM FlashSystem has high availability.

The stability of the IBM FlashSystem is excellent.

There was no downtime when we patched the system, which is good because we wouldn't want our core system to go down.

This solution is very stable. 

While the 9000 series has been robust and reliable, the SS9100 hasn't been so stable. IBM is currently working on a patch that should be out soon to handle the issues we've had.

The stability is very good.

It's really stable, and many customers have experienced this as well. 

Overall, stability is really, really good. We ran into some issues with compression, but it was because we were trying to overload it. So if we don't do that, it runs really, really well.

Yes, some bugs in the system, like nodes warm-started.

We are a 100% satisfied with the stability of the solution.

The solution is stable. I rate it an eight out of ten.

It's a very stable product. I like it, and I have a lot of customers using it.

The stability's been rock solid. If we take a look at the V9000 and the base of what it's built on, it is the heritage of IBM Storwize. This goes back to IBM SAN Volume Controller or SVC. We're on a very mature code base and it is a code base that's been very extendable.

So over the years, they've been able to inject new capabilities in the product line while still keeping the product very stable. We've had customers who have been through multiple upgrade cycles over the life of the product with no issues at all.

We have performance and spiking issues of which IBM applied a work-around patch.

The FlashSystem 900 is a relatively stable platform. While any codebase will have some issues and require patching (nothing is perfect), the codebase on which the FlashSystem 900 is built is solid.

So far, it's been a very stable platform. There have been some issues lately with some bad codes, but for the most part, it's been very stable. It is something that I can recommend at any time.

We have had to bounce services several times over the past two years.

It is a stable solution.

IBM FlashSystem is quite stable. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.

We have never ever had an incident with it making the infra go on its knees, nor did we have any datacorruption ever.

All storage solutions have bugs and all have their correctives that might not address an issue on the first occurance or under all circumstances. When the system is stressed and under some specific (nonetheless rare) conditions , the developped code might trigger a reboot of a controller node  to avoid data corruption. A system with 2 controllers is resilient enough on its own and a reboot of a node to prevent e.g. cache merge problems or alike is not harmfull.

To me, the need to evict a controller node and warm boot it is actually intentionally a safety precaution that avoids data corruption, something we all want to stay out as much as possible. It's as reliable as any other product in that respect. All solutions that I know off like DELL EMC Unity, Fujitsue DX-series or 3PAR Storeserv respond in the same manner to avoid datacorruption. I've seen it the most on the SVC (code 7.1/7.2 around 2012/2013  , but not on the  Storewize v7000 Gen1 to Gen2+ solutions, though I have to admit they all had about 40 to 50% of the load of the SVC.

The solution is highly stable. We did not receive any errors in the two years since we have been using them. We had one occasion when we had to call IBM for a replacement flashcard, otherwise, we did not have and performance impact or any issue with the FlashSystem.

The product has been stable for the last three months.

Stability has been great. Every time that we had a failed drive or a failed piece of hardware, it's been no problem. The systems have stayed up, with no problems at all.

We sometimes had a problem with some bugs in FlashSystems. One time, one FlashSystem was burnt up. There was some smoke and the data was damaged. We saved it because we have redundancy in the cluster. At the cluster level, we make copies and replicate to the other site for disaster recovery situations.

We had no major issues with stability. It's pretty stable.

FlashSystem is very stable.

This solution is stable and high-performing, causing no hassles or problems.

IBM FlashSytem is very stable.

It isn't really stable per se. We've had some problems over the years. We experienced some problems with the backplane, from what I recall. There were issues switching the discs. We had a lot of issues with discs. Of course, the problems didn't really happen in production.

This is absolutely a stable product. However, we will probably not continue to use it in the future. One of the reasons for wanting to switch is the price. Also, technology is evolving and we will probably adopt a hyper-converged solution.

It is stable. 

Stability-wise, this solution is fine. However, we have been having some trouble with our cluster breaking. 

Some isues were encountered during upgrades in the early firmware versions. This has now been resolved.

No.

It is very stable. I see a lot of code upgrades being done on the system. Probably twice or three times in a year, they get new upgrades and code upgrades. That's pretty stable.

It is stable, because it's use an ASIC in it's development. Therefore, that does the job and it doesn't have software at its core.

It is stable.

The stability is awesome. It's based off a mature product line, Spectrum Virtualize. It's a long standing product. It's been around since 1999, so that core technology is there.

The flash system has grown from the old TMS days. It's a well-known and proven technology, so they've combined the two well-known and well-proven technologies to form this solution. It's just very solid.

So far, it's been very stable. There have been no issues.

It's been a great product. As they increase the firmware codes and add new enhancements, it just becomes more stable.

This solution is very stable.

IBM FlashSystem is a stable solution.

The stability is quite good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's a very reliable product.

For me, it's stable.

Stability has been good. We haven't had any issues, besides those that were our own fault when we pushed the work loads too high.

I have not had any real issues. I think it is very stable. We have not had any outages or any unexpected issues. I would say it’s very stable.

It's very stable.

IBM FlashSystem is a stable solution.

IBM FlashSystem is stable, we have not found any issues.

No problem, in fact it is a characteristic that I like.

This is not an enterprise solution, and our team doesn't sell that. That's how it is. So we shouldn't expect an enterprise level solution. Whatever is marketable for the segment serves a purpose.

No.

The stability of the system is fine.

There are some stability issues.

Yes, we faced power supply failure, Multiple SAS drives failure, and at the end both controllers were dead.

We've had some issues with stability, such as a couple of hardware failures and a couple of code bugs. They were addressed, but they caused initial customer concern.

The stability is not very good. Over the course of the last two years, we had two incidents with flash storage when we lost our data. We have three flash storages and we lost all the data on two of them. That was not very good.

Stability has been excellent and we never had any problems.

It's very, very stable, and we have never had issues.

So far, stability is fine. It's been almost three years now and it's working perfectly well. I don't have any hardware issues or any other performance issues. I've had only good feedback about the system.

It is very stable. We've been using this solution for more than ten years. We're using it on our three big sites, there were no issues.

So far, it seems pretty stable. We haven't had any major issues.

We did not have any issues from the client saying that Storwize had stability issues. We didn't have any issues with it. 

No, no at all.

The stability is very good.

IBM FlashSystem has been stable in our operations.

The solution is stable.

Good stability.

The solution is stable.

It is stable.

Only battery for controller.

It is very stable.

none so far.