The solution’s licenses pricing is different from one region to another region.

I rate the solution’s pricing a seven out of ten.

I’m a huge believer in the open source concept. However, it’s important to consider the total cost of ownership.

Many apparent solutions that appear to be low cost on the surface end up costing more for development and operation. One of the many strengths of the Streams platform is its computational efficiency.

It’s common to be able to run the same load on much less hardware than would be required for some of the alternatives. Not only does this relate to lower recurring operational costs, but also results in more simple administration.

It is a tad expensive, however, they have fairly deep experience with the healthcare application and work closely with the vendor to provide forward leaning technology.