IBM Integration Bus Pros and Cons
IBM Integration Bus Pros
My favorite feature is the XML-based DFDL mapping, which is a tool that allows you to graphically map legacy data formats to modern data formats.View full review »
This solution is very reliable and it is easy to learn.View full review »
Easy to understand documentation with a huge list of examples and tutorials.
Web interface, REST API for viewing services, admin, stats, and deployment are premium features, which makes IIB stand among its competition.
REST API design and development support are useful. Building and exposing APIs using GUI API designer with editor makes implementation a breeze.
IBM support is fantastic and quick.View full review »
It is one of the most stable products which I have seen in the market.View full review »
From a performance point of view, it's very good and it doesn't need very much in terms of CPU resources.View full review »
IBM Integration Bus has a complete set of tools that are implemented between rules when it comes to run time, but it's not easy to understand.View full review »
The integration with other tools is excellent. It integrates well with batch issues.View full review »
It is very straightforward. It is very user-friendly integration.View full review »
The solution's features are all quite useful. We use all of them.View full review »
It has the ability to be deployed without rewriting the code.View full review »
IBM Integration Bus Cons
This solution would benefit from improvements to the configuration interface.View full review »
I would like to be able to run and install this solution on different platforms.View full review »
Development toolkit (based on Eclipse) should be improved in terms of responsiveness.
Current aggregation implementation should be deprecated. MQ independent, as well as an intuitive solution, should be proposed.View full review »
IBM does not support orchestration, which is how they designed it, and other BPM tools in the market support orchestration. If they merged the BPM capability into this product, then it would be a better solution.View full review »
This product uses the PVU (Processor Value Unit) license model from IBM, and it is something that should be improved.View full review »
I would like to see more metered rest and API support. IBM is already working on it on Version 11, but it still needs improvement.View full review »
IBM could improve its connectivity.View full review »
To scale virtically, is difficult.View full review »
The user interface could be improved in a future release.View full review »
I would like for them to make the training much easier.View full review »