IBM MQ Pricing

Sanjay Sahu - PeerSpot reviewer
People Manager at Capgemini

Small-scale companies may not want to buy IBM MQ because of its high cost. There are freeware in the markets, and many users are motivated to use those.

View full review »
MB
Senior Developer at a media company with 10,001+ employees

IBM could lower the price because many companies are abandoning MQ from Mickey Mouse products like RabbitMQ and Kafka. Kafka is horrible but free. 

View full review »
SS
Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

We have a multi-year OIO (open infrastructure offering) with IBM and if there is any additional licensing required it gets deducted from the OIO. We have been using IBM's other services as well.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
IBM MQ
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about IBM MQ. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Bhushan Patil - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at ABSYS Consultancy Services

I rate the product price a four on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price.

View full review »
MA
Product Development Manager at Arab Bank

The MQ license is a bit high.  I rate IBM MQ six out of 10 for affordability. 

View full review »
MT
Head Of Operations at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

You have to license per application installation and if you expand vertically or horizontally, you will be paying for more licenses. The licenses are approximately $10,000 to $15,000 a license, it can get expensive quite quickly.

We maintain and support a lot of applications across a wide enterprise. Therefore the cost of licenses increases with each individual implementation of a client because we have to pay for licenses. We are looking for an alternative solution to reduce costs by going to an open-source messaging system because we do not need the robustness of IBM MQ.

View full review »
VM
Director of Internet Technologies Division at IBA Group

The pricing seems good according to the functionality that the solution provides.

View full review »
Manjunath-V - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Member Of Technical Staff at Tata Consultancy Services

I'm not involved on the licensing side. 

View full review »
RJ
Integration Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

I don't have any information related to licensing costs. 

We likely have an enterprise license, based on the size of infra that we have. My understanding is it is not very expensive. However, for a new company, it may be pricier.

We get everything in a bundle. There are no extra costs involved. 

View full review »
Manoj Satpathy - PeerSpot reviewer
Assistant consultant at vvolve management consultants

A different team handles the setup, and likely they also handle the licensing. I don't have any visibility on the cost of the product. 

View full review »
DP
Enterprise Architect & Solutions Architect at AIA Australia

I think IBM needs to look at its pricing. The prices of IBM products should be simple. The old way of pricing should now be moving on to the cloud to be pay as you go, a plan-based kind of pricing.

To become competitive, they actually need to move to AWS and Azure. If they really want to be highly available, they can have a highly available location, and charge another price.

View full review »
JJ
Websphere MQ Specialist at a maritime company with 10,001+ employees

This is a licensed product. We do pay for it.

While, of course, it would be better if it was cheaper, the service they provide with it, including the maintenance facilities they provide, is very good. We're quite happy. Most people have to use what IBM provides, however, it could be a cheaper license.

View full review »
IF
ExaminerExaminer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

IBM MQ is an expensive solution compared to other solutions. However, if you pay less you will not receive the same experience or features.

View full review »
LL
Solutions Director at Thesys Technologies

The licensing for this software is on a yearly basis, but the bank is holding just one license for the entire bank: a corporate license. As for additional costs, it's a standard fee that includes the maintenance and updates that are released periodically.

View full review »
SM
Senior Technical Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

This solution requires a license and we have purchased an enterprise license.

View full review »
GT
Lead Architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

The fee for this solution is on the higher end of the scale. The licensing fee is high.

View full review »
VP
Lead Software Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

IBM is expensive.

View full review »
it_user631794 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Principal Integration Architect at Sabre

It's super expensive, so ask them if they can consolidate some other licensing costs. But, IBM is IBM, so I guess we'll pay for it.

View full review »
SS
Senior Technology Lead at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

The solution costs are high, it is going to cost a fair bit for annual operating costs and support.

View full review »
EC
Architect & System Engineer at Servicio de Impuestos Internos

The price is high. 

View full review »
Ahmed Elgrouney - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Integration Developer at ISFP

The licenses for our company are according to port authority contract sales and we buy a license for six months or one year. I don't know the exact costs of the licenses.

View full review »
PP
Senior Middleware Administrator at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

It is a licensed product. As compared to an open-source solution, such as RabbitMQ, it is obviously costly. If you're using IBM Message Broker, which is a licensed product, IBM MQ is included in the same license. You don't have to pay separately for IBM MQ. The license cost of IBM MQ is lesser than IBM Message Broker.

View full review »
AA
Unix/Linux Systems Administrator at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

IBM MQ is expensive and they charge based on the CPU.

View full review »
GB
Senior Solutions Architect at Department of Justice

I think the pricing is reasonable, especially with IIB as a part of it.

View full review »
Dinesh Patri - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager - Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

IBM MQ's pricing is higher than its competitors'.

View full review »
RV
IT Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

There is real money involved here. As compared to RabbitMQ, IBM MQ is on the higher side in terms of cost.

View full review »
FT
Architect at T-Systems International GmbH

We have a special contract with IBM MQ that give us a certain price.

View full review »
NT
Service Delivery Consultant at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

The problem with this product is that it's a little bit expensive. This is one of the main challenges that we face with our clients. The charges are high and there should be a less costly solution available. This is especially true when you consider it in comparison to open-source tools that are available.

View full review »
Sergey Sidorov - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief of Integration Department at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

It would be a 10 out of 10 if it wasn't so expensive.

View full review »
PM
Technical Manager at MetLife

I was not involved in the pricing structure.

View full review »
Yogesh Kshirsagar - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate V P - Technology Delivery at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

The price of IBM MQ could improve by being less expensive.

I rate the price of IBM MQ a three out of five.

View full review »
Viktor Dolyna - PeerSpot reviewer
DevOps Engineer at Integrity

The price of the solution could be reduced, and we are on an annual subscription.

View full review »
it_user340590 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Solution Architect or Program Manager at a financial services firm

Pricing could be better, as with all IBM products. But their performance in production, along with security and scalability, will pay returns in the long run.

View full review »
it_user632718 - PeerSpot reviewer
Application Architect at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I'm not aware of the pricing. That's something others deal with, but they do tell me that it is expensive. I don't know how much it is.

We have an ELA contract with IBM and everything is included. It's not like MQ has a different price, and different products have difference prices. Everything is done as part of one big contract

View full review »
SM
Sr. Solution Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

You do need to pay a licensing fee in order to use this product. We pay it on a yearly basis. 

View full review »
AS
Technical Specialist at a maritime company with 10,001+ employees

We pay an annual license fee. 

View full review »
VP
Integration Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

The solution is expensive.

View full review »
SR
Enterprise Architect at a energy/utilities company with 501-1,000 employees

I think it's pretty reasonable, but I'm not so too sure of the current pricing strategy from IBM. We use many bundled services, and most often, we go through a service provided by some other third-party implementation. So, I can't really give an honest opinion about that.

View full review »
it_user671943 - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal Middleware Engineer / Automation Specialist at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Use the new and lightweight version (Liberty) to lower licensing costs.

View full review »
PT
Database Administration Team Leader at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

The pricing could be lower. It's not the cheapest option out there. However, I don't have comparison prices with other solutions at this time. We're working on comparison pricing currently.

View full review »
SK
Sap Financial Accounting Senior Consultant at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

For individual projects, IBM MQ may cost more. Here, we are using it globally. It is distributed around the world for our operations, so cost-wise it is less for us. But if you go with individual licenses, the cost of IBM is much more.

View full review »
SN
Senior Technical Architect at Nagarro

It is a very expensive product compared to the open source products in the market.

View full review »
BN
Architect at Franklin Templeton

IBM MQ appliance has pricing options, but they are costly. 

View full review »
it_user885045 - PeerSpot reviewer
Consulting BPM Architect at Ivory Software Corp

99.999 percent availability for less than a penny per message over the past 25 years.  IBM MQ is the cheapest software in the IBM software portfolio, and it is one of the best.

View full review »
it_user105384 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager - Enterprise Information at a government with 51-200 employees

Since this was not the initial direction CIPC was embarking on, we had the minimal license requirement. The cost was less than the value we would be getting out of this product. There's an annual license with support and it is reasonable cost wise.

View full review »
ST
VP - Accelya Kale Solutions Ltd at Accelya World SLU

In terms of cost, IBM MQ is slightly on the higher side.

View full review »
ME
Enterprise Solutions Architect at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

IBM MQ has a flexible license model based on the Processor Value Unit (PVU) and I recommend it.

View full review »
it_user1140819 - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration Consultant at Dubai Technology Partners

Although I'm not involved with costs in our company, IBM products, in general, have high licensing costs and support costs are too high. A lot of people have started using open-source, like Kubernetes and microservices. There is also Apache ActiveMQ. There are many other products out there.

View full review »
KG
Lead Talent Acquisition Specialist at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

The licensing fees are paid quarterly and they are expensive. This is something that I have heard from all of the organizations that I have worked with.

View full review »
MR
IT Consultant at Ministry of Justice, Kuwait

Whatever the price is, it's worth it.

View full review »
AS
IT Team Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

It's a very expensive product.

View full review »
DS
Works at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

I cannot speak to the pricing of the product. I can't say if it's overly expensive or reasonably priced as I don't deal directly with licensing. 

View full review »
it_user121524 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. System Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
IS
Project Manager/System Architect/Senior Mainframe System Engineer/Integration Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

There is a different platform price between Windows, z/OS, and iSeries.

View full review »
BB
Works

To implement such an IBM solution, a company has to pay a lot in term of licensing and consultancy.  A pricing model might be a better option.

View full review »
NT
Service Delivery Consultant at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Most of our customers are quite happy with the solution but they have an issue with the cost. They want to move to cheaper solutions.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
IBM MQ
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about IBM MQ. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.