IBM MQ Stability

Sanjay Sahu - PeerSpot reviewer
People Manager at Capgemini

It's very reliable and stable. We haven't received any frequent challenges.

We have sufficient memory and storage. From a network point of view, the TCP/IP protocols are challenging.

View full review »
RR
Software Development Manager at Reliance Jio

The solution is an older product and very stable. Our product teams never have issues with it.

View full review »
SS
Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

It is stable.

We have only had issues with the IBM GPFS File System, but that is a different product. We had an issue when we wanted to have an Active-Active deployment architecture across our production and disaster recovery site. We wanted the same MQ server to fail over to the disaster recovery site and come up from the state in which it went down on the production site. To achieve that we need a synchronous file system that is able to replicate the same data on the other side.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
IBM MQ
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about IBM MQ. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Bhushan Patil - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at ABSYS Consultancy Services

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

View full review »
MA
Product Development Manager at Arab Bank

MQ is stable, but we face some limitations with redundancy.

View full review »
MT
Head Of Operations at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

The solution is very stable.

View full review »
VM
Director of Internet Technologies Division at IBA Group

It is a stable solution. I rate the stability nine out of ten.

View full review »
Manjunath-V - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Member Of Technical Staff at Tata Consultancy Services

Product-wise, there is no problem with the stability.

That said, when there are a lot of messages, I may need to increase the bandwidth or the queue size. If I have to increase the queue size, maybe I can increase it to even a million, however, in the down sessions, when I extract the transaction, it takes a lot of time. When I want to see what information is inside the queue when I extract it, it takes much more time, which could be looked into. It might be a performance issue or something. It might not happen every time. Whenever there is an issue with a large set of transactions, for example, if, in a minute, you get a lot of transactions, we might have an issue. Still, it rarely happens. 

View full review »
RJ
Integration Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Stability-wise, we have no problems. It's very stable. 

View full review »
Manoj Satpathy - PeerSpot reviewer
Assistant consultant at vvolve management consultants

The stability is good. In fact, we have not seen any issues. Only recently have we observed an issue. There was a limit on the number of messages it could contain. We are having an issue now, however, we have not usually seen any issues related to IBM MQ. Therefore, in general, the solution is stable. I'd rate its reliability eight out of ten. 

View full review »
JJ
Websphere MQ Specialist at a maritime company with 10,001+ employees

The product offers good stability. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's very reliable in terms of performance.

View full review »
MB
Senior Developer at a media company with 10,001+ employees

It's stable. I'm working for a FT 500 company, a global company employing about 60,000 people, and we've been using this product ever since I joined the company in 2003. We haven't had a single major performance issue or crash.

View full review »
it_user631662 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

There were no issues in regards to the stability or scalability so far. Like I mentioned elsewhere, I've been using it for years now and it has really matured, at this point. We are really happy.

View full review »
it_user631758 - PeerSpot reviewer
MQV Admin at Allstate

We haven’t had any stability problems at all. Stability has been outstanding. We went from multi-instance queue managers, which worked fine, except they worked often. That wasn't good for us. So it was a perceived outage for our clients. The availability has been outstanding with the MQ appliance.

View full review »
IF
ExaminerExaminer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

IBM MQ is stable, performs well, and is highly reliable. They guarantee message delivery.

View full review »
AA
It division head at MOI kuwait

I rate IBM MQ ten out of ten for stability.

View full review »
LL
Solutions Director at Thesys Technologies

IBM MQ is very stable. It's the best server in terms of interconnectivity. The reliability that the MQ series has, I haven't seen in other servers that are also based in MQ.

View full review »
SM
Senior Technical Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

The solution is very stable. We have not had issues, except for the connection dropouts which could be related to the machine we are using.

View full review »
it_user632802 - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

In regards to the stability of the product itself, it's pretty good. However, it depends on the configuration as well. Overall, the stability is good.

View full review »
it_user632739 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Engineer at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

It's a very stable product. Being one of IBM's high-end messaging solution, it's a very robust product.

View full review »
it_user523131 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr Project Manager - Infrastructure Delivery (Mainframe Services) at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Stability is unrivaled. We've got no problems with it. It's like the mainframes. When you're looking at five nines for availability, it's there all the time. MQ is there all the time. If we have a problem, it's not part of the conversation. It's more of a case of a database on the other end that we're using as a repository is having a problem. You can go out there, store the messages, and guarantee delivery if there are any interruptions. It just works for us.

View full review »
GT
Lead Architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

The solution is rock-solid and stable. 

View full review »
VP
Lead Software Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

In terms of stability, IBM has proven to be very rare. It's a very stable product.

We test in very large volumes.

We tested ActiveMQ and it's nowhere close to IMB MQ.

View full review »
it_user632745 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Unit Head at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

The stability is pretty good, so far. We had some challenges with some of the clustering during initial setup. But once that was done properly, it was quite stable.

View full review »
it_user631668 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager Z at BBVA

I'm satisfied with the stability.

View full review »
it_user631794 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Principal Integration Architect at Sabre

We have stability in our environment because of the product. We can keep adding solutions to the mixture and it still performs as is, which is again a more stable process.

View full review »
it_user523119 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director, Computing Services at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

We've used it for many, many years. We use it on the client, a regular Windows platform. We also use it really, really heavily on the mainframe side, and it's very stable. We've had very few problems with it. When we do have problems with it, it's usually the application, not the actual MQ solution.

View full review »
NK
Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

IBM MQ is reliable.

View full review »
SS
Senior Technology Lead at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

We had stability issues with the solution. I would be looking at replacing the product, but I am not in charge.

View full review »
MA
Product Development Manager at Arab Bank

It's very stable. 

View full review »
EC
Architect & System Engineer at Servicio de Impuestos Internos

We are happy with the solution. It is stable and doesn't require much maintenance. Two people maintain this solution: an architect and engineer.

View full review »
it_user632754 - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

We have a rather large implementation. Perhaps, the largest one on the planet and from a stability perspective, it's very stable, i.e., when it's used appropriately.

View full review »
it_user631704 - PeerSpot reviewer
DB2 Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

It's one of our more stable products on the CMS platform. We really haven't had any issues with that in terms of severity incidents, at least of what I'm aware of for the last three years.

It's very stable; we've not had to dedicate a lot of resources to support the product and that's a plus.

View full review »
Ahmed Elgrouney - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Integration Developer at ISFP

The solution is stable.

View full review »
RS
Ops Innovation Platform Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

It's been a pretty reliable and well structured solution so far.

View full review »
WK
ICT Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

We don't have a problem with stability.

View full review »
it_user632751 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees

Stability is really good, actually. We haven't had any issues with IBM MQ .

View full review »
it_user632688 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Middleware Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

It's pretty stable. We did not experience any downtime. Probably, there's no other product out there like MQ for messaging. It's the most reliable solution. We had our MQ running in production for almost 800-900 days without any issues, i.e., for more than three years, we didn't even have to restart, and still everything runs so smoothly.

View full review »
it_user632748 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Business Leader at Visa

Very stable. Within the last year or so we hardly had any issues with the MQ or the queue itself going down.

View full review »
it_user631773 - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Leader at EDF

The stability is quite good. It's strong and the performance is important.

View full review »
it_user523173 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director IT Platform Engineering at Staples

Stability is very good.

View full review »
it_user523143 - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineer at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

It's very stable.

View full review »
NK
Technical Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

The stability of the solution is very good. I would give it a nine out of 10. The main features are its reliability and availability and, as a messaging platform, it's very good in those areas.

View full review »
it_user632682 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager Middleware and Database Systems at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

We are very happy with the stability.

View full review »
it_user523137 - PeerSpot reviewer
Power System Specialists at Fiserv

Stability’s pretty good. I haven't had any issues. Although, in clustering, you have to know exactly what you're doing. Otherwise, your cluster will be out of whack a little bit. Otherwise, it's stable. It's very stable.

View full review »
it_user523155 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Technical Architect at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees

It's very stable. It's been around forever. They have functions and features that are useful. Core-wise, it's a very stable product.

View full review »
VZ
Cloud Integration Leader - Cloud Migration Leader at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

IBM MQ is highly stable.

View full review »
PP
Senior Middleware Administrator at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

IBM MQ is a very stable product. You also get very good support from IBM, but we rarely have to go back to IBM for support.

View full review »
it_user1332093 - PeerSpot reviewer
Lead Architect at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

It's very stable.

View full review »
AA
Unix/Linux Systems Administrator at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

The MQ service has never gone down and has never failed us. It is only offline when the VM is offline.

View full review »
GB
Senior Solutions Architect at Department of Justice

We did not encounter any issues with stability.

View full review »
it_user631791 - PeerSpot reviewer
Assistant analyst at Office of Attorney general of Texas

MQ is very stable. It's a very simple application to set up, and once it is set you don't have to really configure or monitor it so much.

View full review »
it_user631665 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Director at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

We are absolutely happy with the stability.

View full review »
it_user631755 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Systems Engineer at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees

It's been stable. Stability hasn't been a problem, as long as you have enough capacity. It's all about sizing it right for the size of your environment.

View full review »
it_user523146 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Resource Manager at a engineering company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Like most of the IBM products, it's pretty stable. We haven't really had any real challenges. We run it on the mainframe as well as open systems and both are incredibly stable.

View full review »
Dinesh Patri - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager - Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

IBM MQ's stability is good.

View full review »
it_user631779 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Assistance Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

The product's stability is really good. I have recently heard that they're introducing a separate appliance for this. That's going to be a very good step for everyone.

View full review »
it_user523128 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Architect at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

It's very stable. We've been using it for quite some time now, 8-10 years.

View full review »
it_user523116 - PeerSpot reviewer
Application Architect Lead at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

It is very stable. We’ve had outages and downtime but, out of about 9,000 servers, we'll have a couple go down a month. Overall, that's pretty good.

View full review »
RV
IT Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Its stability is great.

View full review »
it_user632736 - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise Application Integration Specialist at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I think the stability is great. That's one of the assets IBM MQ is known for.

View full review »
it_user631707 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Middleware Architect at a media company with 10,001+ employees

It is a very stable product. We have been using it for more than ten years. It is very stable.

View full review »
it_user632697 - PeerSpot reviewer
Middleware Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

I know that they're coming out next with IBM MQ Version 9 or 10, so they are always updating the versions. It is a very stable product.

We did experience some security issues with the older versions. As of now, people can log in as root, i.e., whoever wants to log in as root, they can. However, with the new version, they're taking that away.

View full review »
it_user631656 - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineer at Yapi Kredi Bank

It is very stable.

View full review »
it_user523152 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director Of Technology at Compuware

Stability is a hallmark of the product. It's extremely reliable. We set up a queue and we say, “Go,” and we have virtually zero issues with it. Considering that it's interfacing with multiple different products, it's remarkably reliable.

It's one of those things where, if somebody says there's a problem, you're like, "What? That can't be possible." We really haven't really had any outages to speak of.

View full review »
FT
Architect at T-Systems International GmbH

IBM MQ is a stable solution, it is used mainframe computers and it is secure.

View full review »
Guirino Ciliberti - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Governance & Lineage Product Manager at Primeur

IBM HQ's stability is great - we send six million messages a day, and we're very satisfied with HQ's ability to handle that volume.

View full review »
NT
Service Delivery Consultant at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

This product is used on a daily basis and it is quite stable. In terms of reliability, I would rate it a five out of five.

View full review »
DB
Software Engineering Expert at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

We have had stability issues using the solution for some of our projects.

View full review »
Sergey Sidorov - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief of Integration Department at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

The solution is very stable. There are some bugs, but they are very small.

View full review »
PM
Technical Manager at MetLife

For the last three years, I haven't faced any stability issues. I would rate the stability as a nine (out of 10).

View full review »
it_user523170 - PeerSpot reviewer
Security And Audit Analyst at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

I have a very high impression of the stability of MQ; we haven't had any problems with it. MQ has been very stable. I think we've had it go down once since I've been here, but it was due to something somebody screwed up somewhere else, not MQ's fault.

View full review »
Yogesh Kshirsagar - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate V P - Technology Delivery at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

IBM MQ is stable.

View full review »
Viktor Dolyna - PeerSpot reviewer
DevOps Engineer at Integrity

The solution is stable.

View full review »
it_user340590 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Solution Architect or Program Manager at a financial services firm

Not applicable.

View full review »
it_user632718 - PeerSpot reviewer
Application Architect at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It's very robust. It's stable. Whenever we have a situation where our listener is down for some reason, MQ has the capacity to put those messages into some queues where we can retrieve them later on.

It has those alerts built-in. It tells our operation that the queues are getting filled up and they need some attention. We have those kinds of features turned on.

View full review »
it_user632673 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Manager at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

It's very stable.

View full review »
it_user631680 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Engineer Manager at a wellness & fitness company with 10,001+ employees

Lately, it hasn't been that stable. We're using multi-instance queue managers and we're having a lot of issues with storage and that affects the availability of the queue manager.

View full review »
it_user631698 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Engineering at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

It's very stable.

View full review »
it_user523107 - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

It's pretty stable. I don't work with the support of it much, so I'm a general user.

We do have issues from time to time, but because our environment is so complex, it's hard to say whether it's MQ's fault or the messages coming in and out of MQ. I deal a lot with performance and capacity. When there are capacity concerns, when there is too much taking up the system’s CPU, it's difficult to see where the issue lies, but I would say it's been solid for what I use it for.

View full review »
SM
Sr. Solution Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

The stability has been good. The performance is reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

View full review »
AS
Technical Specialist at a maritime company with 10,001+ employees

The stability is good. 

View full review »
SR
Assistant Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

It is stable, for sure.

View full review »
it_user632733 - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise Architect at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

We've been using it for ten plus years now, so it's been good.

View full review »
it_user631719 - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise Architect at a transportation company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Stability-wise, it has worked for us. It is an old technology and it has always worked well for us.

View full review »
it_user631695 - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems Programmer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Stability is great. We have not had any issues recently. Version 7 was a tough one, but since then, they've improved it.

View full review »
it_user632730 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

Normally, the system is very stable but we've actually just got a call, "Part of it's down!" So, at the moment, we have got a bit of downtime.

View full review »
it_user631782 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director of Technology at Brownells

Stability is great. Stability is rock solid. We have very few issues with it.

View full review »
it_user523176 - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of IT Department at BBAC

It’s very stable.

View full review »
it_user523113 - PeerSpot reviewer
Large System Administrator at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It’s up 24/7.

View full review »
it_user523110 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Infrastructure Manager at Royal Caribbean International

It is extremely stable.

View full review »
it_user523122 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director Mainframe System Engineering at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It's extremely stable. We very seldom have any issue with it. We have it clustered between z/OS and zLinux. We've never had any serious problem with it.

View full review »
VP
Integration Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

The solution is stable.

View full review »
VB
IT Development Manager at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

The stability of the solution is good. We've never run into any issues.

View full review »
UR
Independent Consultant at State Bank of India

It is stable.

View full review »
it_user671943 - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal Middleware Engineer / Automation Specialist at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

We have not had stability issues.

View full review »
it_user632700 - PeerSpot reviewer
Infrastructure Manager at Colruyt Group

There is no downtime. It is very stable.

View full review »
it_user631683 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Manager at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I haven't had any stability issues. I think the biggest thing, when there are issues, is having an easy way to figure out what's going on. I think one of the things that I'm looking forward to, from a MQ perspective, is just having more of a user-friendly experience. MQ has traditionally been somewhat of a command-style solution, so anything that they could do to improve that would definitely be helpful.

View full review »
it_user631746 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Developer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Stability is pretty good, really. We have not had any downtime.

View full review »
it_user523134 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Infrastructure Services Lead - Mainframe and Enterprise Batch at Rogers Communications

Stability is awesome. MQ is up all the time. We never have an MQ issue. The interfaces that feed into MQ are quite stable and the APIs associated with it are quite proficient. MQ is a very efficient piece of software from a CPU utilization perspective, which I'm interested in. It's very productive and it's quite tuned in terms of performance.

View full review »
it_user523158 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director IT Business Systems Applications at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

It is solid. We have no stability problems with MQ.

View full review »
it_user523164 - PeerSpot reviewer
Unix Admin at Desjardins

Stability is good. It's okay.

View full review »
it_user523140 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Stability is pretty good. We haven't had issues from a stability perspective. It seemed to always be running. Everyone seems to say, "Hey, it's an MQ issue." Once you look at it, though, the bottleneck is always somewhere else.

View full review »
GT
Lead Architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

The stability is good. 

View full review »
SN
Senior Technical Architect at Nagarro

It is a stable product. The reliability is better than open source software solutions. MQ performs even in extreme conditions.

View full review »
it_user105384 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager - Enterprise Information at a government with 51-200 employees

We have not had any issues with stability.

View full review »
it_user523179 - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems Manager with 1,001-5,000 employees

It's solid. It's one of the few things that just runs, and runs, and runs.

View full review »
it_user631761 - PeerSpot reviewer
Engineer at WinWholesale

For the stability of this product, I would give it a 9/10 rating. Only sometimes when some queue manager dies, then at that point, we lose a couple of messages but not a whole lot.

View full review »
it_user632712 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Manager

Stability is very strong. We haven't had any issues.

View full review »
ME
Enterprise Solutions Architect at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

We have not encountered any stability issues.

View full review »
it_user1140819 - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration Consultant at Dubai Technology Partners

Stability-wise, it's very good. People have been using it for 15 to 20 years. MQ and IIB are the most stable products from IBM.

View full review »
it_user632676 - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise Integration Architect at a financial services firm

Stability is rock-solid.

View full review »
it_user632685 - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems Administrator at a healthcare company

The stability is very good, actually. In our organization, we saw almost 99.9% uptime for the product.

View full review »
it_user632658 - PeerSpot reviewer
RCM Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm

With the newest version, we haven't really had any stability or scalability issues. I guess that's a good thing.

With the previous versions, it was just that we were a version behind on what the version of Maximo and everything we were using, so it was causing a few little glitches and buggy issues.

View full review »
it_user631797 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technology Solutions at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

We never had stability issues. The issues are there only when you are configuring for the first time. Once you get the right configuration, then you can actually forget about the fact that there is MQ.

View full review »
it_user631710 - PeerSpot reviewer
Middleware Admin at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

We have not experienced any stability issues. We have been running this for almost about five years now. I don't think, up to this day, we've had any server down issues primarily because of MQ, i.e., the product itself. It's very stable.

View full review »
it_user631725 - PeerSpot reviewer
Application Architect at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

We are happy with the stability.

View full review »
it_user523161 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

It's rock solid.

View full review »
KG
Lead Talent Acquisition Specialist at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

The stability is absolutely perfect when it is running on AIX. However, I have experienced some issues with certain Linux distributions. With AIX, I have not had any problems with IBM MQ. With other flavors of Linux, there is some instability whereby the MQ configuration parameters are not giving the proper information. From this, I have concluded that the stability of MQ depends on the Linux distribution that it is running on.

View full review »
MR
IT Consultant at Ministry of Justice, Kuwait

There have been no issues with the stability of the solution.

View full review »
AS
IT Team Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

The stability is okay.

View full review »
KP
Consultant at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

It is stable.

View full review »
it_user632727 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technology Architect at Accenture

There were not many stability issues, for sure. MQ is predominately a stable product, right from the z System days. I started out my career with z Systems, so we used MQ with part of the integration and it really helped us.

View full review »
it_user632694 - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

The stability is good. I mean we do have some issues but we always contact IBM whenever we have performance-based issues and we get solutions quick and fast.

View full review »
it_user632691 - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

I don't know about the stability.

View full review »
it_user632742 - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Flow Manager at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I can say that it's stable.

View full review »
DS
Works at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

The solution is very stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

View full review »
it_user632715 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Specialist at a wellness & fitness company

This product has very strong stability. We don't have interruption problems.

View full review »
CM
Principal Solution Specialist at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I believe the stability of the product has decreased since we began using it initially.

View full review »
it_user631677 - PeerSpot reviewer
Analyst at Erie Insurance

The solution is very stable.

View full review »
SB
Sr. Middleware/Data Specialist at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

The solution is stable. 

View full review »
it_user121524 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. System Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
IS
Project Manager/System Architect/Senior Mainframe System Engineer/Integration Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

It is very stable.

View full review »
SP
Administrator at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

The stability looks good.

View full review »
it_user632757 - PeerSpot reviewer
Analyst at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees

I've had very good luck with it. It's a little bit slow when you open it, but once you're inside, it seems to respond very well.

View full review »
it_user632706 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Specialist at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Good stability.

View full review »
NT
Service Delivery Consultant at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

The stability and performance are good and our customers are happy with these aspects. In my years working with it I haven't seen many issues, and with the type of support IBM provides, it has been fine.

View full review »
RH
freelance at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

MQ is known for its stability.

View full review »
it_user523101 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Architect Mainframe at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

For the most part, it is stable. Sometimes, we have issues, but they are internal issues.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
IBM MQ
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about IBM MQ. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.