We switched from version 8 of IBM ODM to version 11 on the cloud for a few customers, but it is still on-prem for some. The cloud edition has greater scalability.

It is best on the market!

We have complete control over how the system is configured, managed, and run.We are using about eight server systems. In terms of scalability, it's more like a plug-and-play. We can just keep on adding however many servers we would like to add.

I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten.

We haven't really had to worry about increasing the scalability on it. When our infrastructure was set up, it was set up to add on. So if we truly wanted to scale up our infrastructure, we could just plug in servers, push it out, add another Rule Execution Server, XU, and apply it to it.

It's scalable. More and more geographic regions were added to the requirements for what we did for Walmart.

We expanded both horizontally and vertically. So we can add more clusters onto the WAS, and you can still scale it up.

No.

It is incredbly scalable. It is very easy if we need to add more rules to it. 

It is fine if we need to add more applications to run through it. That is very easy to do.

This solution is scalable.

Scalability is really good. We have it deployed on ODM, which comes on WebSphere Application Server. We have it on a cluster environment of two nodes, production and test. It is scalable as much as we need it, if needed. Two node is good for us right now. If we would ever need to scale higher than that, the scalability of WebSphere would allow us to do it. 

Scalability was the main reason we chose ODM, as it can handle almost a magnitude more transactions per second than its competitors. 

We are pushing it quite crazily and, currently, from the scaling, we don't see an issue. So it scales.

In terms of scalability, we have some 2,000 rules. In the next year, we expect to increase that amount by ten percent. It gives us that kind of scalability.

We are still testing and figuring it out.