IBM Rational DOORS Scalability
I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. We have a large user base, so scalability is important.
Approximately 300 individuals actively use the tool.
View full review »CA
Carlos Alvarez Prieto
Senior Integration System Engineer at NATS (En Route) Plc
It is a scalable product. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a seven or eight out of ten.
My clients are usually enterprise-sized businesses.
IBM Rational DOORS is very easy to scale.
It makes no difference to us whether you have 20 or 2,000 requirements. IBM Rational DOORS makes it simple to manage them.
We have about 35 licenses, but there are many more users. They are all float licensees.
IBM DOORS is used by approximately 60 people.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
IBM Rational DOORS
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about IBM Rational DOORS. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
AA
AreejAlbishi
Software Engineer at Kacst
It is a scalable solution. We have about 15 end users. We are planning to increase the usage and procure more licenses.
View full review »KP
Kulbhushan Patl
Senior Software Development Engineer at eQ Technologic
10-15 users are using this solution. Four to five users are using this solution every day.
I rate the solution’s scalability a seven to eight out of ten.
You can request licenses if you need more access from more users.
View full review »IBM Rational DOORS is a scalable solution. We have 10,000 to 15,000 people at our company. We have about 30 people on our team, but many other users also have access to it. Maybe 100 people access my project.
View full review »Developing skilled & experienced specialists that know how to setup DOORS projects and help existing ones adopt best practices takes time and the only way to get real experience is to do it, hard to find the people distributed across the geographical boundaries to fill these roles over prolonged periods of time.
View full review »KM
reviewer1403823
Sr. Systems Engineer at a manufacturing company with 1-10 employees
I have worked on programs that varied in size from a couple of hundred requirements up to tens of thousands of requirements in the database. It always seems to work beautifully, irrespective of the size. In this regard, I think that it scales well.
On any given day, we have potentially dozens of administrators and hundreds of users. We have facilities from Florida to New York to California and everywhere in between.
View full review »AS
Alexander Sena
Spacecraft Systems Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
The product is very easy to scale, in my opinion. It will slow down as you scale, but it's the best way to handle a large project in my opinion. It can chew through something big, it just might do it slowly. We have around 500 user accounts.
SH
Shanice Hopson
Software Engineer, Space Systems Department at National Aeronautics and Space Administration
IBM Rational DOORS is scalable.
We have approximately 300 users within the region.
View full review »HZ
Hubert Zenner
Technical Sales Specialist at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
DOORS is a file-based data storage system, so it isn't that useful for large user communities. If they want to work with the standard client, it is crucial to have a solid connection between the client and the database software because there's a lot of communication back and forth, so the scalability is not so great. Some of my customers have installations with upwards of 100 clients.
View full review »CW
Christian Wilmers
Process Developer at ZF Friedrichshafen
In my opinion, the solution is scalable, but it is limited because you have to stay within one location. You cannot scale it across the whole world because of the dependency on network performance.
For this solution, we have several hundred users across several databases. In addition to the end-users, we have a system architect, system engineers who put in the requirements, functionality developers who break it down to the system requirements, software developers, and testers.
View full review »JK
Julie Kent
Lead Modeling & Simulation Engineer at Mitre
I think overall it is scalable and has measured up to everything we have tested it with.
View full review »AV
reviewer1734621
ARP4754 Structured Development & Process Assurance at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
The scalability is good in the sense you are allowed to have many users, but performance-wise it will decrease if you have too many. However, it can scale in different ways for certain other requirements, it is very good. I have no issues. It's easy to manage.
We have hundreds of people using this solution, mostly in the engineering department.
This solution is being extensively being used in organizations.
View full review »WL
Wayne Lindo
Systems Engeriner/Owner at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We have two people in the company that uses the solution.
We do not have plans to increase usage. We are moving towards a more digital environment where we are using SysML and UML to write requirements instead of text-based messages. IBM Rational DOORS should have the capability to model these requirements, but currently, the add-on they have is not effective.
While a large number of requirements may be present, managing them effectively is a separate challenge. There are various tools available for managing requirements, such as IBM Rational DOORS, but they may not always be sufficient. Effective requirements management is crucial in this field.
The field of engineering is evolving, moving away from traditional methods of management, such as using tools, such as IBM Rational DOORS to organize and allocate textual requirements. The 2018 DOD strategy for digital engineering highlights this shift towards utilizing models rather than documents in the digital environment. However, many people are still stuck in the old ways and unaware of this change. It is important to keep in mind that the new way of doing things also involves developing architectures using the modeled requirements.
I rate the scalability of IBM Rational DOORS a ten out of ten.
View full review »We have been very successful deploying the product to users in Dallas, Chicago, Ireland, Germany and Japan.
View full review »FC
reviewer1589274
President at a outsourcing company with 11-50 employees
In the projects we've done, we've never bumped into a limit where we needed to do anything to accommodate the project. It just works. So, we've never had to scale it.
In terms of the number of users, we're limited to about three people who use it, and they're all hardware and software engineers.
It is being used extensively. We use it every day. We could apply it to other things. If there was a lower-cost version of it, we would probably use it more widely through our projects, so that's really more a function of the cost of the product than the usability of it.
View full review »FD
reviewer1308144
Electronics and Software Development Area Manager at a transportation company with 501-1,000 employees
The original version has some scalability problems. In some specific cases, we had some problems managing all of the client's licenses and digital locks.
We currently have about 25 to 30 licenses and that covers 50 to 70 users.
View full review »I have never personally scaled Rational DOORS above approx. 100 active users and at that size we had no problems. I know of organizations that have 1000s of users. The key is to strategically divide your projects among several DOORS servers.
View full review »No issues encountered.
View full review »JA
Juergen Albrecht
System Engineer / Requirements Engineer / Managing Director at CCC Systems Engineering Suisse GmbH
From my side, scalability is okay so far. I have not had any bad experiences in our own use or with clients.
Our clients who use IBM Rational DOORS are usually large, enterprise companies, like airline industry companies, like Siemens, we work with Audi, Mercedes, and BMW. So we are not usually talking about small companies. But they are not all alike and we have clients of all sizes.
No issues encountered.
View full review »DOORS can be scaled to a large number of users and usually modules can contain many attributes and objects. The main issue is the local drives, the faster the drives that DOORS data reside the faster the response on the client. Servers on virtual machines might sometimes be slower because of the way the local drives have been attached to them (storage SANs). But usually is pretty fast. I have worked in environments with more than 300 users and the only issues encountered are the data that were within modules (number of objects) and the history that was recorded. If there is a design behind it on what you need to record within DOORS then usually there are no issues. Sometimes in projects people are getting over excited and from the point that there was no tools and no control and everything was done in paper, they tend to create a lot of attributes to track even the smallest thing, this can create a performance issue as the data recorded are too many.
DOORS can be delivered to distributed teams with Citrix. This in my experience is the best solution as the performance impact through remote access is minimal (XenApp or XenDesktop). It is not advisable to be delivered trough Microsoft terminal server alone as there are performance issues and DOORS is not so usable. Then it can be secured with Netscaler, and delivered to any devise so when people are on the road they can use DOORS to perform their activities from anywhere.
View full review »NK
Nitin Kaushik
Quality Assurance at Varroc Lighting System
The solution is quite adaptable to encapsulate the growing needs of organizations in terms of growth, new functionalities, and enhancement.
View full review »I have not had any performance issues between a Rational DOORS database of 100 requirements vs. one with 10,000+, beyond an expected increase in processing time for dealing with more objects. Even with 100 to 10,000 requirements, processing time for common tasks only goes from a few seconds to a few minutes.
View full review »It is based on a single, centralized database server, making multi-site exchange and collaboration somewhat challenging.
View full review »JA
Juergen Albrecht
System Engineer / Requirements Engineer / Managing Director at CCC Systems Engineering Suisse GmbH
I have worked on smaller projects in the past and everything has worked fine, including the requirements and visibility. My clients have been happy and this has caused them to grow by purchasing additional licenses.
That said, this solution does not scale as well as I thought it would, so improvements could be made with respect to scalability.
View full review »JK
Julie Kent
Lead Modeling & Simulation Engineer at Mitre
The solution seems pretty scalable, from what I have seen.
In our organization, we have about 25 people on the solution currently. We've extended slightly. I believe we have at least 50 licenses out there that can be used.
View full review »We used it on one programme to start with, but when I left the company, we were using it on five separate programmes.
View full review »JT
Jean Jacques Tchouto
System Engineer at Toll Collect GmbH
Rational DOORS is easy to scale.
View full review »GR
GuillaumeRAYNAUD
Corporate Engineering at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
It's a bit difficult to say how scalable this program is, because you are driven by the number of license that you have. I can't remember the model we're using, but I believe it is a floating license mode. Eventually, if you have too many people connected at the same time on IBM Rational DOORS, the last one can't access to the program. So the scalability is limited by the license scheme. We have around 10,000 users currently.
View full review »I have not encountered any issues with scalability. I have experience of supporting databases containing hundreds of thousands of requirements with no issues that cannot be mitigated through good schema design.
View full review »BP
BrunoPencole
DOORS Expert at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
The solution isn't scalable.
View full review »LM
Leith Mudge
Systems Engineer at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
When it comes to scalability, I think it is a little bit expensive to get more users onboard. I do not think there are practical limitations to scaling the use, it just might be costly to take on additional licenses to scale.
View full review »No issues encountered.
View full review »DH
reviewer1150074
General Manager & Founder/consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
It is very scalable. You can start with a few sets of data and then add more as needed, so it's very scalable. It is also easy to customize and I am satisfied with it.
Depending on the project, we may have one or two people using this solution, all the way up to perhaps 50 people.
View full review »It has scaled for our needs.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
IBM Rational DOORS
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about IBM Rational DOORS. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.