I would rate the stability a seven out of ten. 

We do a lot of testing compared to other companies. We face a lot of downtime, even for a normal website. There are a lot of bugs, but the vendor has not solved anything yet.

It's a stable product that is difficult to experience crashes. Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

IBM Rational DOORS is a stable solution.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give stability an eight.

IBM Rational DOORS is very stable.

I would rate the stability of IBM Rational DOORS a nine out of ten.

It is a stable solution. 

The product is stable.

I rate the solution’s stability a nine out of ten.

By placing the DXL we've developed under heavy levels of scrutiny with code reviews, configuration control, change control boards and frequent interactions with the actual users of the solution we've been able to avoid the typical pitfalls that might come with developing customizations.

I have had no problem with stability and I think that it's worked very well. I have been using it for many years and from a user's perspective, other than the change in the name, it's been very stable and very consistent.

There are a few bugs, some of which get addressed in updates, but there are still a few that you have to fix right out of the gate. 

This solution was very stable. It took our staff a while to transition from previous technology to DOORS. Otherwise, the tool itself was very stable. In the end, people saw the difference. Especially when it came to traceability from the system requirements to the product requirements, to the software requirements.

If I have left it open for too long, there are times where we experience a session timeout, and we have to stop or force-close it to restart the application.

From the time that I have been using it, it's been pretty good. Like anything that has been left open, you will experience a timeout.

DOORS is stable. I have seldom have problems with it.

This is a stable solution, although it depends on the network connection. It runs poorly on a slow network connection, so you need a fast connection.

IBM Rational DOORS is stable.

The stability of the solution is good. However, you can access the database remotely and when you have too many users, you see the performance reduces. I don't know what the exact threshold is to where the point that it starts affecting the efficiency. I know when there are too many people accessing the database simultaneously, it can get slow.

I rate the stability of IBM Rational DOORS a ten out of ten.

DOORS has some issues with speed when setup in an enterprise environment. However, DOORS has been the most stable product amongst our engineering tools.

It is incredibly stable. We've never had a problem with its stability.

The stability of the solution was okay, aside for the disconnection issues we faced, it was largely fine.

Not if you take the proper precautions and train users. Bad user practices can undermine stability in the server.

DOORS stability is quite reliable.

The stability is quite nice at this point. After these last few major versions, they have made significant improvement and it is very stable.  

No issues encountered.

This solution has always been very stable and doesn't really ever let us down. We do have Citrix problems because we are centralizing it but as a general rule, it is a solid tool. There can also be problems that are caused by other people's DXL coding, as people are modifying it to work for them. However, it is the modifications that cause the problems rather than DOORS itself. In this context, there are more self-inflicted stability problems.

The latest version of DOORS is very stable. Earlier versions had problems but a lot of them have been fixed. One issue with the 9.6 version is the new feature of resizing and positioning the main DOORS explorer window and opening the last opened modules during start. This feature can give an error message some times which is not easily reproducible. IBM has been informed and there is an open problem.

Not really, but sometimes it crashes when running DXL scripts that have a number of errors. In that case it’s not possible to rule out the cause of trouble.

Partitions are one complex feature of Rational DOORS that are not particularly robust and is generally avoided, unless the project database is administered by a very proficient and experienced administrator.

I have never had any problems with DOORS for any of my clients. It runs fine.

I don't recall any issues with stability, at least no more issues than anything else has. It's not buggy and doesn't suffer from glitches. I can't recall it crashing or freezing. It's pretty reliable.

It is the most stable platform, and did not crash once unlike v9.3.03 version that we had previously.

Rational DOORS is stable about 70-80% of the time.

The program is very stable.

It can crash, but it doesn't happen too often.

IBM Rational DOORS is a very mature stable solution.

We discovered some tech stability issues with IBM Rational DOORS Classic and did not convert to IBM. I'm not really convinced about the solution. Basically, IBM doesn't really support or doesn't want to improve IBM Rational DOORS Classic anymore. However, there are still a lot of customers who have been using this solution for years, some of them even for 13 years or so. 

The solution is stable.

DOORS is a very mature and stable product these days.   

No issues encountered.

Rational DOORS is very reliable compared to the other tools that I have used. It works very well.

There have been no issues with stability.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered,