IBM Rational DOORS Pricing

MarioCataldi - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Consultant Bip - Business Integration Partners at Business Integration Partners

I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very affordable and ten being quite expensive.

It was a little bit expensive. 

View full review »
SanthoshM - PeerSpot reviewer
Team Lead Technical Architect at Vitesco

The licensing cost is too high.

View full review »
CA
Senior Integration System Engineer at NATS (En Route) Plc

I think it's expensive because you have to pay for the licenses to IBM and all that and maintain them. And I think it's quite pricey, but I don't deal with that, so I'm not sure.


View full review »
Buyer's Guide
IBM Rational DOORS
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about IBM Rational DOORS. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Yasmine Abib - PeerSpot reviewer
Systems engineer at Expleogroup

We have to pay for a license. I think it's a one-time payment as my company hasn't notified me about more charges. I don't think it's expensive for large corporations, but it will be costly for an average person.

View full review »
Korhan Candan - PeerSpot reviewer
Engineer at a aerospace/defense firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

It is very expensive.

With five being the most expensive, I would rate it a five out of five. 

I am not sure why it is so expensive, but one license will cost approximately $15,000 in US dollars.

View full review »
AA
Software Engineer at Kacst

The pricing is quite high. We didn't pay for additional support. We didn't need it. They helped us without any cost in the installation part. 

View full review »
Aman Singla - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

You do have to pay for a license per person. 

It is worth the money given the market options. There's good compatibility between you and your clients that makes it valuable. 

View full review »
it_user266616 - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineering meets DOORS & DXL = Expert in all 3 at Raytheon

I've been able to bypass this question for the most part in my line of work and focus more on the client experience once the DOORS server & licenses are available.

View full review »
it_user320079 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Consultant at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

It is an expensive software but worth the spending for a larger firm which require standards across customers.

View full review »
JK
Lead Modeling & Simulation Engineer at Mitre

I would tell them to be very cautious about how they initially import their requirements into the product because that initial import seems to carry more weight and effect than I would have anticipated.

View full review »
WL
Systems Engeriner/Owner at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

IBM Rational DOORS is highly expensive.

View full review »
FC
President at a outsourcing company with 11-50 employees

I don't personally know what the numbers are. I just know that one of the reasons we've limited it to three seats is a function of cost.

View full review »
JA
System Engineer / Requirements Engineer / Managing Director at CCC Systems Engineering Suisse GmbH

All my clients are running under a special agreement using a client-server version of the DOORS product where they get a discount on the product and then only pay maintenance. They pay the maintenance on a yearly basis. They are mostly huge companies and this is partly how they were able to get this special agreement. It works well for them because we have informed the clients how they could reduce their maintenance costs.  

View full review »
it_user305157 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager RM/ALM at a aerospace/defense firm with 10,001+ employees

The best advice is to use tokens so you can use all the appropriate IBM tools.

View full review »
NK
Quality Assurance at Varroc Lighting System

Pricing is on the higher side because of multiple users who want to make use of the great functionality of tools.

Single tool licensing is good, but again it's costly, and with respect to extensions like DWA, DNG, and others, it becomes even more critical for companies who do not have high end budgets.

View full review »
it_user268722 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Specialist/Analyst at a aerospace/defense firm with 501-1,000 employees

For small teams, node-locked licenses are the least expensive by far. As the project team grows, i.e. 10+, one flex licence per five team members becomes more cost-effective.

View full review »
JK
Lead Modeling & Simulation Engineer at Mitre

I don't have much information about pricing. I do know that our organization bought more licenses than we need, however, so we can easily add more people to the solution when we need to.

View full review »
it_user283440 - PeerSpot reviewer
Programme Manager for Engineering (Mechanical) at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees

DOORS rules are that you have licences per company which give access to the software according to the users who need access at a particular time. Most businesses would probably find it too expensive to have a single licence per every DOORS user.

View full review »
it_user292626 - PeerSpot reviewer
System Engineer with 1,001-5,000 employees

Use right license model to suit your needs.

View full review »
it_user276396 - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal Consultant/Director at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Consider the overall cost of ownership beyond the initial license costs. You will need to budget for development of your process, designing and building the schema, training and ongoing database administration and support to users of the tool.

View full review »
LV
Project Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

IBM is a bit too expensive in terms of pricing. Customers are paying a lot for the license, and the price is quite high for this kind of environment. It is quite high as compared to what we can get today with other solutions. 

View full review »
LM
Systems Engineer at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

It is not cheap. It is expensive to onboard additional licenses.  

View full review »
DH
General Manager & Founder/consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees

This is an expensive solution. Licensing fees are billed annually and there is no support included with what I pay.

View full review »
it_user364206 - PeerSpot reviewer
Principal Systems Architect at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

We've found that floating licenses work best.

View full review »
MH
Team Lead SAP ERP at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees

It is very expensive. But, it depends on the project. The project must warrant the expense paid.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
IBM Rational DOORS
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about IBM Rational DOORS. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.