IBM Rational Functional Tester Previous Solutions

Principal Strategist at Xcelliti
I've tried other solutions as well, but IBM is very good. We are very satisfied with IBM, though there are other similar tools available. The problem with them is that they do not cover many things the way IBM does. Often they do one task and then you have to connect them with something else in other to get what you need. It's much better to have a stable product with the full support and scalability required all in one place. View full review »
Test Specialist at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
Prior to using IBM Rational Functional Tester, we used testing software by HP. It was the Unit Functional Tester and HP Quality Center that were later purchased by Micro Focus. I do not know the reasons that we switched to IBM. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2020.
406,070 professionals have used our research since 2012.