IBM Rational Performance Tester Other Solutions Considered
HP LoadRunner and JMeter were evaluated, and those are good solutions too. The client chose RPT due to the Eclipse IDE and the graphical reports. Additionally, RPT doesn’t really require a lot of custom coding. However, being a Java shop, if custom code is needed we are able to leverage in-house Java developers to help in custom code development if necessary.
View full review »KJ
KashifJamil
CEO at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees
We had the option of Micro Focus LoadRunner, but it was very costly.
View full review »This tool was the only option with the customer withwhom I worked with.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Test Management Tools
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, OpenText, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We chose this product because it was a better price than Loadrunner.
View full review »We evaluate HP Load Runner and use JMeter. Generating of complex performance test with lot of data correlation was much faster and simpler using Rational Performance Tester. In the case of generating robotic performance testing, we still sometimes use JMeter. For LoadRunner, I would say it is a much more strategic decision when to use the tool.
View full review »- Apache JMeter
- RadView WebLOAD
- Neotys NeoLoad
Buyer's Guide
Test Management Tools
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, OpenText, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.